 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Considering HP&#8217;s single architecture impact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/considering-hps-single-architecture-impact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/considering-hps-single-architecture-impact/</link>
	<description>A SearchStorage.com blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: greatwhitenorth</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/considering-hps-single-architecture-impact/#comment-8352</link>
		<dc:creator>greatwhitenorth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/?p=10626#comment-8352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hope would be that a company like EMC would follow this road and replace the VNX line with a smaller Symm giving them a single architecture and interface for all their customers.

However, unlike HP, where the EVA was essentially a dying product, the VNX is still a profitable solution for EMC. Not to mention, if you force your clients to change their current product, there is a chance that they will choose a different vendor. So, if your product is profitable, and the risk of losing customers is minimized by not changing what they know, it seems unlikely that the larger companies will make these wholesale changes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hope would be that a company like EMC would follow this road and replace the VNX line with a smaller Symm giving them a single architecture and interface for all their customers.</p>
<p>However, unlike HP, where the EVA was essentially a dying product, the VNX is still a profitable solution for EMC. Not to mention, if you force your clients to change their current product, there is a chance that they will choose a different vendor. So, if your product is profitable, and the risk of losing customers is minimized by not changing what they know, it seems unlikely that the larger companies will make these wholesale changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
