Comments on: CERN black hole flak headed to court?

By: J.A.

J.A. — Wed, 14 May 2008 21:41:00 +0000

As long, as no black hole exists at The CERN, there are, however,
some few things, I don’t know, if I can deny thinking about, & on
which issue Any Swiss Lawyer/Judge is of course quite welcome to take this time travel investigation issue up with me, so that I can of course tell the questioned one & e.g. help myself find out, what purpose is whose, something which, however, requires a certain motivation, please.
Greetings, Ifoundittout@yahoo.com.

By: JTankers

JTankers — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:44:08 +0000

If black holes need enormous amounts of energy to substain their existence, then we would not have super giant black holes at the center of our galaxies that should very rarely accrete real matter.

Like our own solar system, all is in orbit and in balance, the matter orbits rather than being accreted by the sun. So why have the super massive black holes in the center of the galaxy not evaporated? And how did they get so big? Do we know that they are not growing? If so, what are they feeding on. Do we know that they are not feeding on vacuum energy?

I suspect that micro black holes are rarely created in nature. How often would cosmic rays of identical mass and speed collide exactly head-on to focus all energy precisely to a single point? It will happen in the collider…

By: gernot neuwirth

gernot neuwirth — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:35:23 +0000

Re: atomic bomb might ignite the atmosphere, i.e. nonsense:
The black hole scare is indeed reminiscent of that 1945 fear. But
if I remember correctly – set me right if I’m wrong – that “nonsense” was a serious concern of a minority of Manhattan Project scientists before the first bomb tests. After all, it was all terra incognita, and that the chain reaction might get out of control was probably a legitimate even though improbable concern. If I remember correctly, it was then a U.S. general who ended the discussion by taking personal responsibility for any consequences. Yes, that’s what the world needs: Daring men who do not mind taking responsibility – at their own risk and at that of the rest of humankind.

By: Matt

Matt — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:41:58 +0000

Isn’t this “black hole that will eat the Earth” concept like the “theory” that the detonation of an atomic bomb might ignite the atmosphere, i.e., nonsense?

By: Eric

Eric — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:18:06 +0000

Several Atrato patents are pretty easily found on Google patent search; they are filed under “SHERWOOD INFORMATION PARTNERS” (company’s previous name before Atrato), Daniel M. McCormick and/or Jonathan E. Hall. Would be nice to see your search link from the horse’s mouth though, as I am only seeing 14 patents – though they cite “hundreds of patent claims” which would be technically correct given 8-10 claims per patent.

I question the Minnesota attorney’s competence and/or motives. FYI, I have no special interest other than as a spectator, and potential end user.

By: T-Roland

T-Roland — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:03:14 +0000

A black hole needs an enormous amount of energy to substain their existence. And since the particles that are being smashed together are extremely small, the theoretical black hole will collapse within nano-seconds.

By: Neil

Neil — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 04:12:35 +0000

May Date is a lie!!! I have been studying CERN and there ajenda for about 7 years now.

This is the count down from the CERN website.

http://aliceinfo.cern.ch//opencms/system/galleries/pics/AlicePublic/countdown.swf