 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blackberry outage a storage issue?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/blackberry-outage-a-storage-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/blackberry-outage-a-storage-issue/</link>
	<description>A SearchStorage.com blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Pariseau</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/blackberry-outage-a-storage-issue/#comment-6936</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Pariseau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/02/14/blackberry-outage-was-a-storage-issue/#comment-6936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brad, appreciate you pointing that out and regret the error. The post has been amended with links referring to the most recent outage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, appreciate you pointing that out and regret the error. The post has been amended with links referring to the most recent outage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/blackberry-outage-a-storage-issue/#comment-6935</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/02/14/blackberry-outage-was-a-storage-issue/#comment-6935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beth, the C&#124;Net article you refer to describes last year&#039;s outage. It was published April 19, 2007. There is no point in guessing that the cache they are referring to is the cache in a high-end disk storage system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth, the C|Net article you refer to describes last year&#8217;s outage. It was published April 19, 2007. There is no point in guessing that the cache they are referring to is the cache in a high-end disk storage system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/blackberry-outage-a-storage-issue/#comment-6934</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/02/14/blackberry-outage-was-a-storage-issue/#comment-6934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting post - especially the issue you raised in the last paragraph regarding the changing face of computing, e.g. increased multi-tenancy and data consolidation.  

In my opinion, this is a clear example of the need for specialized utility computing services.  Blackberry shouldn&#039;t be managing their own storage because it isn&#039;t their area of expertise - they should continue focusing on managing their network, extending their software, and managing communications.  The storage question should be abstracted away and solved by an storage service provider (SSP?), a firm that specializes in secure abstract storage at massive scale.  An early (very incomplete) example of this is Amazon&#039;s S3 (which, incidentally, would not work well in this specific instance, but is a precursor to the kind of service I&#039;m talking about).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post &#8211; especially the issue you raised in the last paragraph regarding the changing face of computing, e.g. increased multi-tenancy and data consolidation.  </p>
<p>In my opinion, this is a clear example of the need for specialized utility computing services.  Blackberry shouldn&#8217;t be managing their own storage because it isn&#8217;t their area of expertise &#8211; they should continue focusing on managing their network, extending their software, and managing communications.  The storage question should be abstracted away and solved by an storage service provider (SSP?), a firm that specializes in secure abstract storage at massive scale.  An early (very incomplete) example of this is Amazon&#8217;s S3 (which, incidentally, would not work well in this specific instance, but is a precursor to the kind of service I&#8217;m talking about).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
