 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taylor&#039;s Take on Storage &#187; iSCSI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-management/tag/iscsi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-management</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>This Week in Storage (2-20-09)</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-management/this-week-in-storage-2-20-09/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-management/this-week-in-storage-2-20-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taylorallis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCoE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-management/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See the Tweek N Storage (2-20-09) Taylor&#8217;s Take on Delicious (2-20-09) Listen to Beth’s Storage Headlines The Storage Buzz:   In: RAID 6 &#124; 5 Minutes Ago: RAID 5 &#124; Out: RAID 10 Sun jumbles key management picture Right after EMC/RSA, HP, and IBM proposed a new Key Management protocol through OASIS, Sun releases an open-source [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>See the <a href="http://twitter.com/taylorallis/status/1232465721">Tweek N Storage (2-20-09)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://delicious.com/TaylorAllis/2-20-09">Taylor&#8217;s Take on Delicious (2-20-09) </a></li>
<li>Listen to <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/storage-headlines-for-02-19-2009/">Beth’s Storage Headlines</a></li>
<li>The Storage Buzz:      <strong>In:</strong> RAID 6<strong> |</strong> <strong>5 Minutes Ago:</strong> RAID 5 <strong>| Out:</strong> RAID 10</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p><a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid5_gci1348276,00.html">Sun jumbles key management picture</a><br />
Right after EMC/RSA, HP, and IBM proposed a new Key Management protocol through OASIS, Sun releases an open-source protocol.<span> </span>Sun says the proposed OASIS protocol is lower-level – which wouldn’t surprise me.<span> </span>But OASIS claims its protocol will address more devices (disk, tape, laptops, mobile devices, switches, applications).<span> </span>This also doesn’t surprise me as the Sun protocol got its roots in Tape Drive encryption, and OASIS members (esp RSA) play in multiple areas of the market.<span> </span>Another standards battle to watch, although the majority of vendors are with OASIS…</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid5_gci1348611,00.html">Brocade sees slowdown in convergence demand</a><br />
Quick primer:<span> </span>iSCSI sends SCSI commands in TCP/IP over Ethernet = cheaper SANs.<span> </span>FCoE maps FC natively over Ethernet = iSCSI competitor.<span> </span>Stephen Foskett gives a great summary of the <a href="http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/10/16/fcoe-versus-iscsi/">FCoE vs. iSCSI battle</a>.<span> </span>So now Brocade has slowed its FCoE rollout – but is this because market demand is low; or Brocade is focusing more on its FC roots in this tough economy?<span> </span>(Be sure to read Scott Lowe’s excellent question on his blog post, “<a href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2009/02/20/is-unified-fabric-an-inevitability/">Is Unified Fabric an Inevitability?</a>” <span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://storagezilla.typepad.com/storagezilla/2009/02/emulex-converges.html">Storagezilla: Emulex converges</a><br />
While we are talking convergence, Mr. Zilla gives a great summary of the recent Emulex convergence announcements.<span> </span>It was a good week for the HBA player – they celebrated their 30th anniversary, rang the bell at the NYSE, and announced a ton of new products.<span> </span>New products include their Universal Converged Network Adapter (CNA) called OneConnect which handles multiple network protocols (Ethernet, FC, iSCSI); as well as their EmulexSecure Encryption HBA.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid5_gci1348442,00.html">Storage industry debates standardized cloud API</a><br />
Moving on from Key Management protocols…..now we need to hash out Cloud protocols!<span> </span>A standard API for moving data in and out of the cloud.<span> </span>My take is that it is way too early for this.<span> </span>Startups will try to make a standards play to get more traction, Amazon won’t play unless they really need to.<span> </span>And today Amazon is the furthest ahead in the Cloud race – so they don’t need to.<span> </span>How easy Clouds are to access and utilize is still a differentiator for companies – so any standard is far off in my book.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-management/this-week-in-storage-2-20-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Real with RELDATA</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-management/getting-real-with-reldata/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-management/getting-real-with-reldata/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taylorallis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reldata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storagemanagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-management/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple months ago we had a client that needed to migrate production data from one data center to another across geographies. There were a couple of complications, so our team put their heads together on a solution. A Client’s Need We determined it would be faster (and cheaper) to replicate the data from Data [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;  Normal 0       MicrosoftInternetExplorer4  &lt;![endif]--><!--[if !mso]&gt;--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">A couple months ago we had a client that needed to migrate production data from one data center to another across geographies.<span> </span>There were a couple of complications, so our team put their heads together on a solution.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>A Client’s Need</strong><br />
We determined it would be faster (and cheaper) to replicate the data from Data Center A’s production environment to some sort of storage repository.<span> </span>Then we would truck/plane that repository to Data Center B – which had a much faster transfer rate than sending the data over the network (given the amount of data we were dealing with).<span> </span>Once at Data Center B, we could copy the data from our storage repository to its new home.<span> </span>But the production data at Data Center A would have changed over the time the replicated copy was on its trip.<span> </span>So once were up at Data Center B, we would need to sync the delta in data to capture all these changes.<span> </span>This could happen over a network line, as the delta in data would be much smaller than the entire production environment.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It sounded like a good plan – and we had everything we needed to do it but a unified appliance that could handle iSCSI, FC, and NAS protocols as well as WAN replication.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/90/files/2009/02/reldataexample.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-24" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/90/files/2009/02/reldataexample.jpg" alt="" width="425" height="242" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Enter RELDATA</strong><br />
We sat down with the folks at <a href="http://www.reldata.com/">RELDATA</a>, troubleshot the problem, threw a couple tough questions their way, and…were very impressed. What stood out to me was the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>RELDATA is really a unified storage appliance/gateway built from the ground up – they offer iSCSI, FC SAN, and NAS in a virtualized appliance – in 1GbE and 10GbE flavors.<span> </span>They weren’t a NAS company moving into the SAN market; or a SAN company moving into the NAS market – they set out to build a virtual/unified appliance.</li>
<li>They offer local &amp; <a href="http://www.reldata.com/?id=332">WAN data replication</a> &amp; snapshot functionality. Additionally, the appliance looks very simple to install/manage.<span> </span>In fact, their <a href="http://www.reldata.com/dbimages/280__RELvos_Storage_Management_Center.jpg">management council</a> was pretty simple and slick with <a href="http://www.reldata.com/?id=296">some cool wizard functionality</a>.</li>
<li>One for the kickers for me was cost/value.<span> </span>It is priced well (website says MSRP is $40k for a 12TB iSCSI SAN, $85k for a 48TB system with SAS under the hood.)<span> </span>But the real value is in software licensing.<span> </span>It is very simple and has NO capacity licensing, which is refreshing in a world where every new feature seems to come with a complex licensing price tag.<span> </span>In fact, they have <span style="text-decoration: underline">all inclusive</span> software pricing &#8211; NAS, IP SAN, Global WAN Replication, and Virtualization come included. Pretty cool.<span> </span><span> </span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal">RELDATA is a young company, and its roots started in Europe (although they are now HQ’d in NJ).<span> </span>But they are old enough to have several <a href="http://www.reldata.com/?id=252">successful implementations under their belt</a>, and newer versions of their systems are coming out.<span> </span>I also found the people and support in the company to be very good and responsive.<span> </span><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;  Normal 0       MicrosoftInternetExplorer4  &lt;![endif]--></p>
<p><!--[endif]--><!--  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-parent:""; 	margin:0in; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 	{size:8.5in 11.0in; 	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; 	mso-header-margin:.5in; 	mso-footer-margin:.5in; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Section1;} --></p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;!   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0in; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman";} --></p>
<p><!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>RELDATA’s 9240i System</strong><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/90/files/2009/02/reldata_stacked_units_lo.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-26 alignright" style="margin: 3px" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/90/files/2009/02/reldata_stacked_units_lo.jpg" alt="" width="166" height="109" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.reldata.com/?id=211">The <span> </span>9240i is their latest system</a>, some quick specs and highlights:</p>
<ul>
<li>Includes 12TB SAS Storage in 2U that can scale from there.<span> </span>Storage can be added via JBOD expansion shelf.<span> </span>Systems can also be clustered.<span> </span></li>
<li>They claim 70,000 IOPS and 820MBps performance.<span> </span></li>
<li>You can choose the licensed functionality you need right away (iSCSI SAN, NAS, etc.) and turn on optional licenses when needed.</li>
<li>Block-level replication + snapshot included with software.<span> </span></li>
<li>Offers heterogeneous virtualization to play with existing assets.<span> </span></li>
<li>Mix 1GbE and 10GbE connectivity with either six 1GbE ports (expandable up to 16) or up to eight 10GbE ports.</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>A Solid Appliance</strong><br />
So, if you are looking for a practical, solid unified appliance for iSCSI SAN, NAS, replication, <a href="http://www.reldata.com/?id=301">migration</a>, consolidation, etc. take a look at RELDATA.<span> </span>It may not have all the bells and whistles as larger vendors, but it looks to be a well-built and designed gateway/appliance that can get the job done – simply and affordably.<span> </span><span> </span></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-management/getting-real-with-reldata/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
