 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Yottabytes: Storage and Disaster Recovery &#187; eff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/tag/eff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery</link>
	<description>Sharon Fisher on issues, trends, and analysis in storage and disaster recovery.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:05:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Suspects May Not Need to Decrypt Storage for Law Enforcement After All</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/suspects-may-not-need-to-decrypt-storage-for-law-enforcement-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/suspects-may-not-need-to-decrypt-storage-for-law-enforcement-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Fisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[eff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contradicting earlier court actions in other states, the Atlanta-based U.S. Court of Appeals of the 11th Circuit has ruled that a man suspected of holding child pornography on his hard disk drive doesn&#8217;t have to reveal the necessary code to decrypt it for law enforcement, saying it violates his Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. In [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contradicting earlier court actions in other states, the Atlanta-based U.S. Court of Appeals of the 11th Circuit has ruled that a man suspected of holding child pornography on his hard disk drive <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/02/23/court-fifth-amendment-protects-suspects-from-decrypting-computers/">doesn&#8217;t have to reveal</a> the necessary code to decrypt it for law enforcement, saying it violates his Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination.</p>
<p>In comparison, in January a woman suspected of bank fraud was ordered to <a href="http://h30565.www3.hp.com/t5/Policy-Watch/Pair-of-Legal-Cases-Return-Take-Away-People-s-Rights/ba-p/1392">give up her password</a> by a U.S. District judge.</p>
<div class="lia-message-body-content">
<div>
<p>The issue had come down to a question of <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.denverpost.com/recommended/ci_19669803" target="_self">what analogy to use for a data encryption device</a>. &#8221;Is a computer password like a key to a lockbox, as the government argues? Or is it akin to a combination to a safe, as Fricosu&#8217;s attorneys say? While the key is a physical thing and not protected by the Fifth Amendment, the Supreme Court has said, a combination — as the &#8220;expression of the contents of an individual&#8217;s mind&#8221; — is.&#8221;</p>
<p>While the Colorado judge had decided it was more like a key, apparently the 11th Circuit decided it was more like a combination.</p>
<p>There was one other case, also involving child pornography, but in that case, prosecutors had some evidence that the disk drive actually contained pornograpy, wrote the <em>Wall Street Journal.</em></p>
<p>While organizations such as the <a href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/eff-entering-password-decrypting-data-both-testimonial-acts-protected-fifth-amendment-071111?utm_source=Threatpost&amp;utm_medium=Tabs&amp;utm_campaign=Today%27s%20Most%20Popular">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a> supported defendants, prosecutors said that doing so would mean that all criminals would have to do is encrypt their hard drive and they&#8217;d be protected from law enforcement.</p>
<p>What this new result means is that the whole issue is likely to end up in the Supreme Court at some point, which will release a final ruling and settle the issue once and for all.</p></div>
</div>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/suspects-may-not-need-to-decrypt-storage-for-law-enforcement-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple, Dropbox Added to EFF Privacy Coalition</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/apple-dropbox-added-to-eff-privacy-coalition/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/apple-dropbox-added-to-eff-privacy-coalition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Fisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dropbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Electronic Frontier Foundation has announced that two vendors, Apple and Dropbox, have signed a pledge to help support its Digital Due Process initiative, which calls for a rewrite of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act to better protect user data. The initiative has more than 50 members, including Amazon, AT&#38;T, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Twitter, and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Electronic Frontier Foundation has announced that two vendors, Apple and Dropbox, have signed a pledge to help support its <a href="http://digitaldueprocess.org/index.cfm?objectid=37940370-2551-11DF-8E02000C296BA163">Digital Due Process</a> initiative, which calls for a rewrite of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act to better protect user data.</p>
<p>The initiative has more than 50 members, including Amazon, AT&amp;T, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Twitter, and Yahoo!, which were <a href="https://www.eff.org/pages/when-government-comes-knocking-who-has-your-back">called out in April</a> as being major computer vendors that should support the proposal. Steps included in the proposal include telling users about data demands, being transparent about government requests, fighting for user privacy in the courts, and fighting for user privacy in Congress. Companies received from <a href="https://www.eff.org/pages/when-government-comes-knocking-who-has-your-back">one to four stars</a> (including partial stars) depending on how well they are implementing each of these policies.</p>
<p>Dropbox was a particularly interesting addition, because the company has been <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/researcher-files-ftc-complaint-against-dropbox/">criticized about its policies</a> regarding protecting user data in its cloud storage service.</p>
<p>Other vendors pf the 13 that the EFF called out in April that have not yet responded include Comcast, Myspace, Skype (since purchased by Microsoft, which is a member), and Verizon.</p>
<p>Organizations such as the <a href="https://secure.aclu.org/site/SPageServer?pagename=110419_Internet_Privacy">American Civil Liberties Union</a> and the Center for Democracy &amp; Technology are also members.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/apple-dropbox-added-to-eff-privacy-coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
