 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Things the New York Times Data Center Story Left Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/3-things-the-new-york-times-data-center-story-left-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/3-things-the-new-york-times-data-center-story-left-out/</link>
	<description>Sharon Fisher on issues, trends, and analysis in storage and disaster recovery.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:37:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: thomasmckeown55</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/3-things-the-new-york-times-data-center-story-left-out/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>thomasmckeown55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/?p=436#comment-233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The DevOps bottom line: if your civilian friends try to talk to you about the dirty business you’re in, assure them it was all a big misunderstanding. Keep working on the real problems of security, availability, recovery, and operational efficiency already before you. The solutions–solutions in terms of engineering systems which fulfill business requirements–you create within a traditional datacenter framework will also go a long way toward making the most of the electricity, pollution, and other costs contingent on computing. We’re getting better at this every year, and none of the evidence the Times presents deserves more attention.(&lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/QnGzM1)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/QnGzM1)&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DevOps bottom line: if your civilian friends try to talk to you about the dirty business you’re in, assure them it was all a big misunderstanding. Keep working on the real problems of security, availability, recovery, and operational efficiency already before you. The solutions–solutions in terms of engineering systems which fulfill business requirements–you create within a traditional datacenter framework will also go a long way toward making the most of the electricity, pollution, and other costs contingent on computing. We’re getting better at this every year, and none of the evidence the Times presents deserves more attention.(<a href="http://bit.ly/QnGzM1)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://bit.ly/QnGzM1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/QnGzM1</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicken Little in the Datacenter &#124; Real User Monitoring</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/3-things-the-new-york-times-data-center-story-left-out/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicken Little in the Datacenter &#124; Real User Monitoring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 23:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-disaster-recovery/?p=436#comment-232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a systems-and-software perspective, Sharon Fisher specifies &#8220;3 Things the New York Times Data Center Story Left Out for IT Knowledge [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a systems-and-software perspective, Sharon Fisher specifies &#8220;3 Things the New York Times Data Center Story Left Out for IT Knowledge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
