 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storage Channel Pipeline &#187; Storage networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/tag/storage-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline</link>
	<description>A SearchStorageChannel.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): IP networking’s future</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/transparent-interconnection-of-lots-of-links-trill-ip-networking%e2%80%99s-future/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/transparent-interconnection-of-lots-of-links-trill-ip-networking%e2%80%99s-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Slack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eric Slack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCoE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRILL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) was invented years ago as a networking technology to prevent bridge loops (a destructive feedback type of condition) by allowing only one path between network switches or ports. A Layer 2 network protocol, STP computes a plan for routing traffic between every connected device through a “root bridge” such that only [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><a href="http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid7_gci214602,00.html"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;color: #800080;font-size: small">Spanning Tree Protocol (STP)</span></a><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"> was invented years ago as a networking technology to prevent bridge loops (a destructive feedback type of condition) by allowing only one path between network switches or ports. A Layer 2 network protocol, STP computes a plan for routing traffic between every connected device through a “root bridge” such that only one path is used. This path, which is based upon rules configured by the user of the protocol, may not always be the most direct. The plan, or “spanning tree,” describes this set of nonredundant paths and disables all others. When a network segment goes down, an alternate path is chosen, but this process can take a few seconds, something that may be OK for communications but can be unacceptable in a storage network. Another standard, </span><a href="http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/trill/charter/"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;color: #800080;font-size: small">Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL)</span></a><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica">, is designed to address this problem. <span id="more-302"></span></span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica">As networks have grown and become more complex due to technologies like convergence and virtualization, STP has proved to be inefficient. The indirect paths that a spanning tree contains cause data (or migrated VMs) to be routed through more network “hops,” adding latency into the storage environment. This concentration of traffic through the subset of available links that form the tree reduces effective network bandwidth and increases latency. Finally, blocked paths represent unused bandwidth, which only gets worse with each new generation of network hardware. Now, with FCoE bringing more storage traffic to the IP network, these problems will intensify.</span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica">The Internet Engineering Task Force’s Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links network standard applies network layer routing protocols to the link layer and, unlike STP, incorporates a knowledge of the entire network and uses that information to support Layer 2 multi-pathing. This can enable multi-hop FCoE, reduce latency and improve overall network bandwidth utilization. </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">Network performance and efficiency are pretty fundamental concerns for IT organizations. For a VAR, when these issues with STP come up or when the term TRILL is mentioned, some background may be very useful. For more information, take a look at the </span><a href="http://www.storage-switzerland.com/Events.html"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;color: #800080;font-size: small">webinar on TRILL</span></a><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica"> by Storage Switzerland. </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span class="EmphasisA"><em><span style="font-size: 10pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">Follow me on Twitter: </span></span></em></span><a href="http://twitter.com/EricSSwiss"><span class="EmphasisA"><em><span style="color: #152133;font-size: 10pt;text-decoration: none"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">EricSSwiss</span></span></em></span></a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/transparent-interconnection-of-lots-of-links-trill-ip-networking%e2%80%99s-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Low-cost networked storage option: ATA over Ethernet (AoE)</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/low-cost-networked-storage-option-ata-over-ethernet-aoe/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/low-cost-networked-storage-option-ata-over-ethernet-aoe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Slack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eric Slack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Networked storage started (generally, at least in the open systems world) with Fibre Channel SANs and Ethernet NAS, and it was good. Like Coke and Pepsi we had a couple of easily recognizable alternatives for the common requirement of consolidating storage on a network. The marketing of these networked storage technologies kind of devolved into [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><a href="http://searchsmbstorage.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid188_gci1389699,00.html"><span style="font-size: small;color: #800080;font-family: Helvetica">Networked storage</span></a><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Helvetica"> started (generally, at least in the open systems world) with Fibre Channel SANs and Ethernet NAS, and it was good. Like Coke and Pepsi we had a couple of easily recognizable alternatives for the common requirement of consolidating storage on a network. The marketing of these networked storage technologies kind of devolved into a “tastes great; less filling” argument, but that’s to be expected. Then iSCSI came out, promising to provide block storage without the complexity (or cost) of Fibre Channel. As Ethernet performance improved, the Fibre Channel folks figured, if you can’t beat them, join them, and </span><a href="http://searchstoragechannel.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid98_gci1380133,00.html"><span style="font-size: small;color: #800080;font-family: Helvetica">Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE)</span></a><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Helvetica"> and </span><a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid5_gci750990,00.html"><span style="font-size: small;color: #800080;font-family: Helvetica">Fibre Channel over IP (FCIP)</span></a><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Helvetica"> came out as ways to extend Fibre Channel over Ethernet, using the IP protocol. Now there’s another option, one that’s going in the other direction, providing simple storage networking using Ethernet cabling but not the IP protocol. It’s called </span><a href="http://www.storage-switzerland.com/Articles/Entries/2010/6/8_Storage_Evolution.html"><span style="font-size: small;color: #800080;font-family: Helvetica">ATA over Ethernet (AoE)</span></a><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica">, and it’s worth a look. <span id="more-275"></span></span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Helvetica"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Helvetica">ATA, or Advanced Technology Attachment, is the system PC motherboards use to communicate with hard drives. It eliminated the disk controller card, putting its function into the hard disk drive’s interface itself with the most common version being Serial ATA, or </span><a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid5_gci911952,00.html"><span style="font-size: small;color: #800080;font-family: Helvetica">SATA</span></a><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica">. ATA over Ethernet basically replaces the ribbon cable motherboard connection ATA drives had with an Ethernet cable. </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Helvetica"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica">Unlike iSCSI, which encapsulates SCSI commands into IP packets and routes them over a LAN or the Internet, ATA over Ethernet doesn’t use IP addresses or IP packets but instead uses MAC addresses to identify the target device. It also uses the lighter ATA protocol instead of SCSI. AoE packets do pass through an Ethernet switch but at a “layer” below the IP protocol, so they’re not routable. It’s essentially a direct connection between a server and a disk drive, just like it was when the drive was physically inside the server.</span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Helvetica"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica">AoE provides a very inexpensive technology for creating networked storage. It’s open source, but vendors do support it in storage arrays. For VARs, it can be a low-cost alternative to iSCSI or just another point of interest to generate appointments. ATA over Ethernet may be that disruptive solution you need to get into an account that’s buying storage from another VAR. </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: small;font-family: Helvetica"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span class="EmphasisA"><em><span style="font-size: 10pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">Follow me on Twitter: </span></span></em></span><a href="http://twitter.com/EricSSwiss"><span class="EmphasisA"><em><span style="font-size: 10pt;color: #152133;text-decoration: none"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">EricSSwiss</span></span></em></span></a><span class="EmphasisA"><em><span style="font-size: 10pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">.</span></span></em></span></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/low-cost-networked-storage-option-ata-over-ethernet-aoe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
