 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storage Channel Pipeline &#187; primary storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/tag/primary-storage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline</link>
	<description>A SearchStorageChannel.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>‘Converged storage’: Primary storage, data backup in one box</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/converged-storage-primary-storage-data-backup-in-one-box/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/converged-storage-primary-storage-data-backup-in-one-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Slack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Converged storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data  backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Slack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Channel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data protection is like insurance; it’s something you need and something you do but something you probably won’t use &#8212; at least, not very often. Obviously, this is more true when using a DR system to recover an entire data center than when restoring a single file from last night’s backup, but you get the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small">Data protection is like insurance; it’s something you need and something you do but something you probably won’t use &#8212; at least, not very often. Obviously, this is more true when using a DR system to recover an entire data center than when restoring a single file from last night’s backup, but you get the idea. Data backup is an overhead process that doesn’t create any revenue and probably doesn’t represent a real competitive advantage. Essentially, it’s a cost to be minimized.<span id="more-332"></span> </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small">Dedupe has helped by effectively compressing backups into a smaller physical space, and server virtualization has simplified the process by encapsulating a server’s data into a single file. Snapshot and cloning technologies have reduced the impact of taking backups in real time and restoring them, and the cloud has provided nearly unlimited capacity and a ready-made off-site target. </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small">Most backups today are done with these innovations, which improve performance and reduce costs. But most still involve a separate backup application moving data to separate storage in coordination with the </span><a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/topics/0,295493,sid5_tax298620,00.html"><span style="color: #800080;font-size: small">primary storage</span></a><span style="font-size: small"> infrastructure to get that process accomplished without too much disruption. But what if the </span><a href="http://searchdatabackup.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid187_gci1378231,00.html"><span style="color: #800080;font-size: small">backup application</span></a><span style="font-size: small"> itself could be eliminated? </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small">There are </span><a href="http://www.storage-switzerland.com/Blog/Entries/2010/10/6_Nimble_Storage.html"><span style="color: #800080;font-size: small">“converged storage” systems</span></a><span style="font-size: small"> available that combine primary storage and data protection into the same systems, using onboard </span><a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid5_gci1300939,00.html"><span style="color: #800080;font-size: small">SSD</span></a><span style="font-size: small"> and SATA drives. They use a log-based file/block architecture that maximizes data reduction and provides intelligence to keep data on the appropriate storage tier (flash or SATA), producing the performance required by primary storage. With integrated snapshot technology and extended effective capacity to store several months of snapshots, these converged storage systems provide internal data protection that can replace the backup process &#8212; and the requirement to implement a separate backup system. Replication to a second unit is available for local redundancy or a remote DR system.<span>  </span></span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small">This approach represents another alternative for companies looking for a way to simplify storage infrastructures. Instead of just improving the backup process or incrementally reducing its cost, converged storage systems can eliminate dedicated backup altogether. The result can be a storage system that protects itself, reducing the time and resources required to do so.</span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span class="EmphasisA"><em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;font-size">Follow me on Twitter: </span></em></span><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot"><a href="http://twitter.com/EricSSwiss"><span class="EmphasisA"><em><span style="font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color;font-size: 10pt;text-decoration: none">EricSSwiss</span></em></span></a></span></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/converged-storage-primary-storage-data-backup-in-one-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primary deduplication’s effect on data integrity, performance</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/primary-deduplicatio-effect-on-data-integrity-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/primary-deduplicatio-effect-on-data-integrity-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Slack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data deduplication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Slack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage Channel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dedupe has been with us for the better part of 10 years. Because of the percentage of duplicated data in the backup space, it was deployed there first. But risk also played a part in its appearance first in backup. Let’s face it: If your dedupe box craters, it’s still just a backup that’s lost. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">Dedupe has been with us for the better part of 10 years. Because of the percentage of duplicated data in the backup space, it was deployed there first. But risk also played a part in its appearance first in backup. Let’s face it: If your dedupe box craters, it’s still just a backup that’s lost. As a technology matures, it gets more stable, and users start looking for new places to apply it. Generally, their expectations of how much impact it will have (in this case, how much space it will save) also decreases. It’s kind of a risk-reward scenario. That explains why </span><a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid5_gci1376373,00.html"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;color: #800080;font-size: small">primary deduplication</span></a><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica"> is getting attention these days.</span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">The thought of primary deduplication certainly came up early on in the adoption cycle of the technology, but there were plenty of “high-value targets” for the dedupe vendors to go after in backup. When it was first introduced to backup customers, they were promised effective </span><a href="http://searchdatabackup.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid187_gci1417617,00.html"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;color: #800080;font-size: small">data reduction</span></a><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica"> in the double digits &#8212; in the high double digits for some data sets &#8212; and by and large they got it. While dedupe has certainly not been adopted by everyone (current estimates hover around one-third for market penetration), dedupe vendors seem to be ready to move on. <span id="more-307"></span></span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">Now with non-backup data, data reduction numbers are firmly in the single digits. While this wouldn’t have sold may dedupe appliances for Data Domain 10 years ago, it seems to be enough for this second wave of vendors in the primary storage space. But some have questioned the ability of dedupe to perform as a real-time data optimization technology, as it would be in this application. In order for dedupe to become a common technology in </span><a href="http://searchstoragechannel.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid98_gci1376150,00.html"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;color: #800080;font-size: small">primary storage</span></a><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica">, users would have to be confident it would have no effect on data integrity and no appreciable impact on performance. </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small">It turns out this isn’t as much of a stretch as many think, once they look at how dedupe works under the covers. Essentially, dedupe uses technologies similar to those developed for file systems and snapshots (or clones). It leverages </span><a href="http://www.storage-switzerland.com/Articles/Entries/2010/9/7_Making_Primary_Storage_Deduplication_Safe.html"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;color: #800080;font-size: small">extents, metadata management and references to existing data blocks</span></a><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica"> that primary storage users have relied on for years. </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: small"><span style="font-family: Helvetica">As a VAR, you’ve probably seen primary deduplication included in some of your current vendors’ products, or at least you’ve been exposed to it in the news.<span>  </span>Dell recently purchased Ocarina Networks, which developed a primary deduplication technology. BlueArc and Xiotech have announced partnerships with Permabit to incorporate dedupe into their offerings. Based on the number of companies putting dedupe into their primary storage solutions, one would conclude that it’s not just for backups anymore. </span></span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: Helvetica;font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p class="Body" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span class="EmphasisA"><em><span style="font-size: 10pt"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">Follow me on Twitter: </span></span></em></span><a href="http://twitter.com/EricSSwiss"><span class="EmphasisA"><em><span style="color: #152133;font-size: 10pt;text-decoration: none"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman">EricSSwiss</span></span></em></span></a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-channel-pipeline/primary-deduplicatio-effect-on-data-integrity-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
