As a VAR, DR seemed like an ideal solution since it included multiple products and was relatively complex so it would drag a decent amount of PS. But it was always a tough sell. Customers were usually clueless about what a good disaster recovery solution entailed, but getting them to pay anything to resolve this problem was very difficult. You could say they “didn’t know what they didn’t know,” namely, that they had a problem, and therefore were less apt to spend anything on it.

One way to sell DR is to get users to focus on the negatives, the risks they’re running, the cost of downtime, etc. This is the approach everyone takes after a hurricane, like Sandy or Katrina, and was particularly popular after the Sept 11 terrorist attacks. But people have strong denial skills and just aren’t compelled by potential pain to themselves when it’s exemplified by the misfortune of others. Part of the reason may be that the solution has more than a little pain itself.

This is another example of the pain-of-change equation. If it’s more disruptive, expensive, etc., to do nothing than it is to fix a problem, people do nothing. Testing a traditional DR system can be disruptive and expensive as it often requires after-hours work by a number of people at the primary and remote locations and maybe some application downtime as well. It would follow, then, that making DR testing quick and easy is a good way to lower that pain-of-change delta and get people interested in a  disaster recovery solution.

Hybrid cloud DR systems allow customers to back up their application servers to the cloud as VM images and then restart those virtual machines on host servers in the cloud. These systems have the added benefit of making DR testing almost trivial. Users can start these virtual servers in the cloud with a couple of mouse clicks. This can significantly lower the pain of running a DR solution and potentially make it an attractive topic to bring up with customers. 

Follow me on Twitter: EricSSwiss

Humans are reactive, not proactive, except in terms of the next event. After each of these disasters, there was certainly a heightened awareness and some action taken by companies, but it’s safe to say that fewer companies took the lessons of disaster preparedness to heart and actually implemented credible DR plans.

Part of the reason is that credible disaster recovery planning has historically been expensive and complex. Starting with offsite vaulting of backup tapes and evolving through disk backup, deduplication and WAN-optimized replication, up until recently DR solutions have remained beyond the means of most SMBs. Now, however, technology may have come to the rescue. The cloud and widespread server virtualization have created a real DR solution that most companies can afford.

Hybrid cloud backup combines cloud backup with an onsite appliance that takes backups from local servers and then facilitates their transfer to the cloud. When this appliance is designed to take backed-up virtual machine images and even perform physical-to-virtual conversion when backing up standalone servers, a real recovery capability is born. Downtime is reduced to almost zero since these VM images can then be restarted on the backup device. When the appliance synchronizes itself with the cloud, where a compute platform is available from which to start and run those VMs, it becomes a real DR solution.

This “hybrid cloud DR” is being offered by many of the same companies that provided hybrid cloud backup and is becoming a part of more and more storage appliance offerings, as an optional service. This means good things for SMBs since it promises to bring costs down further, although hybrid cloud DR is already in a separate class from “traditional” DR solutions, from a cost and complexity perspective. It’s also good news for VARs, especially those that can offer the cloud service as well.

Follow me on Twitter: EricSSwiss

Cloud is the technology that’s behind many of the subscription-based offerings that resellers are looking at. For businesses, even in the SMB space, a straight online backup solution may not be the best approach, and hybrid architectures have been a good alternative. By putting an appliance on-site, they offer a combination (hence the term “hybrid”) of the benefits that online and legacy backup systems offer. These include fast restores from data that’s local and automatically putting data off-site, but with reduced bandwidth requirements. Hybrid cloud backup has evolved to become a compelling business proposition for VARs.

First, the technology has advanced to include global deduplication, encryption, remote restores and a host of other features that completely differentiate these products from the consumer-grade offerings that masquerade as business solutions. Secondly, the storage appliance is now available as software that users can run on existing server and storage hardware, or buy commodity hardware to support. The software approach keeps costs and the subscription price down, making this an even more appealing alternative to traditional backup.

The software approach makes this solution well suited for MSPs, which can customize the interface with their brand, and for storage VARs, which can sell the hardware and still brand the user interface if desired. For consultants that provide the IT function for small businesses, this represents an especially appealing option. This software can give them a turnkey data protection answer for their existing customers, one that’s simple to implement and still provides a monthly revenue stream.

For any of these reseller profiles, these new software-based, hybrid cloud storage solutions offer an attractive opportunity. They give the MSP, VAR or consultant an enterprise-class backup and DR solution in an affordable format that they can win deals with in a crowded market space.

Follow me on Twitter: EricSSwiss