 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transaction log growth best practices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/transaction-log-growth-best-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/transaction-log-growth-best-practices/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: yupsay</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/transaction-log-growth-best-practices/#comment-1953</link>
		<dc:creator>yupsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/?p=1581#comment-1953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is slightly away from the topic but TLOG size only. As per the documentation the TLOG files are capped at 2 TB (typically you wount be using one this big) you may refer to the MS document at &lt;a href=&quot;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432&lt;/a&gt;. All the papers say that the LDF growth is limited to 2 TB, but here in this test case I&#039;ve a log file at 2.7 TB. Believe the 2 TB limit is for MBR partitions &amp; no holds bar for GPT. Pressuming for documentation this was tested on MBR but with GPT I&#039;m sitting on a LDF 2.72 TB in size. If you all can please share your comments here at &lt;a href=&quot;https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/753184/sql-server-transactional-log-file-ldf-having-a-2-tb-limit&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/753184/sql-server-transactional-log-file-ldf-having-a-2-tb-limit&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is slightly away from the topic but TLOG size only. As per the documentation the TLOG files are capped at 2 TB (typically you wount be using one this big) you may refer to the MS document at <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432</a>. All the papers say that the LDF growth is limited to 2 TB, but here in this test case I&#8217;ve a log file at 2.7 TB. Believe the 2 TB limit is for MBR partitions &amp; no holds bar for GPT. Pressuming for documentation this was tested on MBR but with GPT I&#8217;m sitting on a LDF 2.72 TB in size. If you all can please share your comments here at <a href="https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/753184/sql-server-transactional-log-file-ldf-having-a-2-tb-limit" rel="nofollow">https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/753184/sql-server-transactional-log-file-ldf-having-a-2-tb-limit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrdenny</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/transaction-log-growth-best-practices/#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrdenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/?p=1581#comment-1166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I understand the bug as it was explained to me, create a database, then increase the log by 4 or 8 Gigs manually.  It then should only increase in size by 32k.  It may not do it every time as specific conditions must be met for the bug to show itself, and I don&#039;t have a list of those conditions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand the bug as it was explained to me, create a database, then increase the log by 4 or 8 Gigs manually.  It then should only increase in size by 32k.  It may not do it every time as specific conditions must be met for the bug to show itself, and I don&#8217;t have a list of those conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolaS</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/transaction-log-growth-best-practices/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>SolaS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/?p=1581#comment-1165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.... also tried on SQL 2k5 and again I got 20 VLF with 8 gb autogrowth...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;. also tried on SQL 2k5 and again I got 20 VLF with 8 gb autogrowth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SolaS</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/transaction-log-growth-best-practices/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>SolaS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/?p=1581#comment-1164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Denny, 

I didn&#039;t managed to reproduce this bug on SQL Server 2008 R2 developer edition. 
I created new database, new table, set log autogrowh on 9000 MB and run insert operation. 
When autogrowth operation finished I had 20 VLF in the log file. 
Did I miss something here?
 
Thank you in advance.

Best regards,
Slaven]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Denny, </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t managed to reproduce this bug on SQL Server 2008 R2 developer edition.<br />
I created new database, new table, set log autogrowh on 9000 MB and run insert operation.<br />
When autogrowth operation finished I had 20 VLF in the log file.<br />
Did I miss something here?</p>
<p>Thank you in advance.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Slaven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
