 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SQL Server with Mr. Denny &#187; Manageability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/tag/manageability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:04:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m using simple recovery, so the log file isn&#8217;t important right?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/im-using-simple-recovery-so-the-log-file-isnt-important-right/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/im-using-simple-recovery-so-the-log-file-isnt-important-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denny Cherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bulk Logged Recovery Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Recovery Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recovery Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simple Recovery Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transaction Log]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/?p=2645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the big myths of SQL Server resolves around the transaction log, and how it&#8217;s used with the simple recovery model. Many people think that the simple recovery model doesn&#8217;t use the transaction log.  More specifically they think that it&#8217;s there because it has to be there, but that SQL Server doesn&#8217;t actually use [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the big myths of SQL Server resolves around the transaction log, and how it&#8217;s used with the simple recovery model.</p>
<p>Many people think that the simple recovery model doesn&#8217;t use the transaction log.  More specifically they think that it&#8217;s there because it has to be there, but that SQL Server doesn&#8217;t actually use it.  The reality is that SQL Server still uses the transaction log, much like it does in full or bulk logged recovery modes.  There are some transactions which are going to be minimally logged, but for the most part the INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE commands are going to be fully logged just like normal.</p>
<p>What SQL Server does with the transaction log in simple recovery model is that when the transactions are committed they are written to the transaction log and the pages are dirtied in the buffer pool.  When checkpoint runs the dirty pages in the buffer pool are written to the disk.  Everything up to this point is basically the same as with the other recovery models.  Once the checkpoint has been completed things get different between simple recovery and the other two recovery models.  With the simple recovery model the virtual log files which were just checkpointed and had their dirty pages written to disk will be marked as no longer in use (status=0).  With bulk logged and full recovery this doesn&#8217;t happen until the transaction log backup has been completed.</p>
<p>Hopefully this helps dispel the myth.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/im-using-simple-recovery-so-the-log-file-isnt-important-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft has made the decision to unleash me on Tech Ed North America</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/microsoft-has-made-the-decision-to-unleash-me-on-tech-ed-north-america/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/microsoft-has-made-the-decision-to-unleash-me-on-tech-ed-north-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denny Cherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In Person Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Ed 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Ed North America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/microsoft-has-made-the-decision-to-unleash-me-on-tech-ed-north-america/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently someone at Microsoft has completely lost their mind.  They have signed me up as a speaker for Tech Ed NA 2011.  I&#8217;ll be presenting a session titled &#8216;What&#8217;s New in Manageability for Microsoft SQL Server Code-Named &#8220;Denali&#8221;&#8216;. This is a 300 level session so it will be full of all sorts of &#8220;Denali&#8221; goodness.  [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently someone at Microsoft has completely lost their mind.  They have signed me up as a speaker for Tech Ed NA 2011.  I&#8217;ll be presenting a session titled &#8216;What&#8217;s New in Manageability for Microsoft SQL Server Code-Named &#8220;Denali&#8221;&#8216;.</p>
<p>This is a 300 level session so it will be full of all sorts of &#8220;Denali&#8221; goodness.  Exactly what I&#8217;m keeping a secret for now, you&#8217;ll just have to come to the session to find out.  That or hang out with me at Dev Connections, Rally, etc. and I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll let it slip. <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This will be my first time speaking at Tech Ed, so needless to say I&#8217;m very thrilled to be given this opportunity.  This just goes to show, that if you are loud, obnoxious, rude, etc. you can still get the KICK ASS speaking gigs.  My session is currently listed as TBD still, but you can find <a href="http://northamerica.msteched.com/topic/details/DBI304">my session</a> in the <a href="http://northamerica.msteched.com/contentcatalog">Tech Ed Catalog</a>.  As of when I&#8217;m writing this (Thursday night) it has me listed as &#8220;Denham Cherry&#8221;, but hopefully they&#8217;ll get that fixed to Denny like it should be.</p>
<p>See you in Atlanta in May.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/microsoft-has-made-the-decision-to-unleash-me-on-tech-ed-north-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
