<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SQL Server with Mr. Denny &#187; iSCSI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/tag/iscsi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>What are your opinions on using an iSCSI NAS for SQL Server storage?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/what-are-your-opinions-on-using-an-iscsi-nas-for-sql-server-storage/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/what-are-your-opinions-on-using-an-iscsi-nas-for-sql-server-storage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denny Cherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/what-are-your-opinions-on-using-an-iscsi-nas-for-sql-server-storage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You’ve really got two questions here.  The first is if I like iSCSI for SQL, and the second is if I like NAS for SQL.  NAS doesn’t support iSCSI as iSCSI is a SAN technology. iSCSI is just fine for SQL Server as long as the server and the storage are on the same subnet, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’ve really got two questions here.  The first is if I like iSCSI for SQL, and the second is if I like NAS for SQL.  NAS doesn’t support iSCSI as iSCSI is a SAN technology.</p>
<p>iSCSI is just fine for SQL Server as long as the server and the storage are on the same subnet, and the network has enough bandwidth available to support the data transfer.</p>
<p>NAS isn’t supported for SQL Server, unless the NAS has a SAN head and the SAN head is used for access to the storage.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/what-are-your-opinions-on-using-an-iscsi-nas-for-sql-server-storage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dual HBAs (or iSCSI ports) should be a requirement for every server</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/dual-hbas-or-iscsi-ports-should-be-a-requirement-for-every-server/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/dual-hbas-or-iscsi-ports-should-be-a-requirement-for-every-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denny Cherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proper network design is very important to ensuring the highest availability between your storage array and your server.  This design is important weither you are using a Fibre Channel SAN or an iSCSI SAN.  The basic design is the same. When you have those two HBAs (for the purposes of this post when I refer [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proper network design is very important to ensuring the highest availability between your storage array and your server.  This design is important weither you are using a Fibre Channel SAN or an iSCSI SAN.  The basic design is the same.<span id="more-753"></span></p>
<p>When you have those two HBAs (for the purposes of this post when I refer to an HBA I&#8217;m talking about an HBA for a fibre channel network or an iSCSI initiator for an iSCSI network) you don&#8217;t want to connect them to the same switch (when I refer to a switch in this article I&#8217;m talking about a Fibre Channel switch or an Ethernet switch depending on if you are using a fibre channel connection or an iSCSI array).  Each HBA should be connected to a seperate switch.  Each of those switches should be connected to at least two ports on the storage array, with one port being on each controller or the array (I&#8217;m assuming for this article that the storage array has two controllers on it, and that each array has two ports).  This allows you to have four paths from the server to the storage array. </p>
<p>By having these four paths you have maximum availability of your storage.  This will allow you to survive a switch failing or rebooting as well as a storage controller failing or rebooting.  It will allow you to survive the failure of an HBA.</p>
<p>Some HBAs come with multiple ports on them.  While these will save you a little money because you only have to purchase a single card.  However if this card fails you will loose compleate access to the storage array.  If you want to use the dual port cards, that&#8217;s fine as it will give you additional bandwidth between the server and the switches, but you should use two of these cards so that if one card fails (and cards to fail) the access to the storage array will remain online.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/dual-hbas-or-iscsi-ports-should-be-a-requirement-for-every-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not all multi-pathing software is created equal</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/not-all-multi-pathing-software-is-created-equal/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/not-all-multi-pathing-software-is-created-equal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denny Cherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once you&#8217;ve setup a good redundant network design you need to invenst in some goo multi-pathing software to ensure that you are making the most of the redundant network that you have created. Before you can choose a multi-pathing software you need to understand what the multi-pathing does.  When you connect your server to the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once you&#8217;ve setup a good <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/dual-hbas-or-iscsi-ports-should-be-a-requirement-for-every-server/" target="_self">redundant network design</a> you need to invenst in some goo multi-pathing software to ensure that you are making the most of the redundant network that you have created.<span id="more-755"></span></p>
<p>Before you can choose a multi-pathing software you need to understand what the multi-pathing does.  When you connect your server to the storage array using the redundant network design that I&#8217;ve <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/dual-hbas-or-iscsi-ports-should-be-a-requirement-for-every-server/" target="_blank">prevsouly talked about</a> you will have four paths between the storage array and the server.  Without any multi-pathing software the server would see four copies of each volume on the server.  So if you presented one LUN to the server, you would see that presented to the server as four drives on the server.  You could then assign each one a different drive letter, but you would then need to manually change the drive letters around if a path failed.  Because each path is its own drive letter at the server level you don&#8217;t get the ability to use more than one path at a time.</p>
<p>When you use multi-pathing software the software sits as a software package installed on the server which combines the multiple paths to the storage into a single volume which you can access.  This allows for automatic failover between the paths.  The higher end multi-pathing software will allow you to use those paths in an Active/Active configuration where other mulit-pathing software will only allow for an Active/Passive configuration.</p>
<p>When working with these multiple paths you need to remember that the storage array will only allow traffic to a LUN from one controller at a time.  This means that one path to each HBA can access the LUN at a time.  When the multi-pathing software is working in an Active/Passive configuration only one HBA at a time can be used.  When the multi-pathing software is working in an Active/Active configuration both HBAs are used to access the LUN. </p>
<p>This Active/Active configuration allows you to maxamize the bandwidth available between the server and the storage array.  If you have 4 Gig fibre links between the server and the switch, and from the switch to the storage array this would allow for up to 8 Gigs of bandwidth between the server and the storage array.</p>
<p>An additional bonus of good multi-pathing software is that you can see how much IO is going own each path in near real time.  This can help you diagnose if you have a performance problem on your network topoligy such at a switch which can&#8217;t pass the traffic fast enough, or a cable which isn&#8217;t performing properly.  While the multi-pathing software won&#8217;t tell you &#8220;Hey there&#8217;s a cable problem&#8221; but it will show errors on only the paths which are having problems.  If there&#8217;s a problem with the cable then both paths which use that cable will show errors.  If there&#8217;s a problem with the switch then both paths which go through that switch will show errors.  This all applies to fibre channel SANs as well as iSCSI SANs.</p>
<p>There are several multi-pathing packages out there.  Windows 2008 includes its own native multi-pathing software which can be installed via the Server Manager.  This is considdered a lowerend multi-pathing softwar package as it allows for Active/Passive multi-pathing.  My personal preference for multi-pathing software is EMC&#8217;s PowerPath software.  It allows for Active/Active multi-pathing and allows you to see path by path how much IO is going through the path, as well as how many errors each path has.</p>
<p>While PowerPath is an EMC product it will work with any SAN platform.  If your SAN platform or HBAs came with a multi-pathing software which only supports Active/Passive multi-pathing I&#8217;d highly recomend looking at getting PowerPath for your servers.  PowerPath can be used on FibreChannel SANs or iSCSI SANs without issue.</p>
<p>Hopefully this will give you a better understanding of your storage network which we as DBAs rely on so much.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/not-all-multi-pathing-software-is-created-equal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join me on Oct 21st for a Clustering with iSCSI Presentation</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/join-me-on-oct-21st-for-a-clustering-with-iscsi-presentation/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/join-me-on-oct-21st-for-a-clustering-with-iscsi-presentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denny Cherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clustering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starwind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/join-me-on-oct-21st-for-a-clustering-with-iscsi-presentation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All, On October 21st, 2009 at 11am (Pacific) / 2pm (Eastern) I&#8217;m going to be presenting a free Webcast on how to setup a Windows 2008 Cluster when using iSCSI.  Additionally I&#8217;ll be going over some tuning tricks you can use to improve the performance of your iSCSI network. You can sign up for the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All,</p>
<p>On October 21st, 2009 at 11am (Pacific) / 2pm (Eastern) I&#8217;m going to be presenting a free Webcast on how to setup a Windows 2008 Cluster when using iSCSI.  Additionally I&#8217;ll be going over some tuning tricks you can use to improve the performance of your iSCSI network.<span id="more-742"></span></p>
<p>You can sign up for the Webcast <a href="http://bit.ly/npotR" target="_blank">here</a>.  There&#8217;s a white paper which I wrote which goes along with the presentation which you can download <a href="http://bit.ly/EYUDy" target="_blank">here</a>.  This webcast is being presented by Starwind Software so I&#8217;ll be showing there iSCSI target software during the presentation as well.</p>
<p>There will be a Q &amp; A after the presentation so bring your questions.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Denny</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/join-me-on-oct-21st-for-a-clustering-with-iscsi-presentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SQL Server Clustering Guide &amp; Webcast Links</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/sql-server-clustering-guide-webcast-links/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/sql-server-clustering-guide-webcast-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denny Cherry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starwind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/sql-server-clustering-guide-webcast-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A white paper which I wrote for Starwind Software is now available.  The link to register for the webcast (October 21, 2009) has also been put up.  The webcast and white paper go together, so I recommend that you grab the white paper now and I hope to see you at the webcast next month. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A white paper which I wrote for Starwind Software is <a href="http://www.starwindsoftware.com/sql-server-clustering-guide" target="_blank">now available</a>.  The link to register for the webcast (October 21, 2009) has also been <a href="http://www.starwindsoftware.com/denny-cherry-sql-server" target="_blank">put up</a>.  The webcast and white paper go together, so I recommend that you grab the white paper now and I hope to see you at the webcast next month.</p>
<p>Denny</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/sql-server-clustering-guide-webcast-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
