<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Discussion on: New INSERT syntax in SQL Server 2008</title>
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/new-insert-syntax-in-sql-server-2008/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jan.novak</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/new-insert-syntax-in-sql-server-2008/#comment-51</link>
		<author>Jan.novak</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/new-insert-syntax-in-sql-server-2008/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Hi Denny and all.

It is good to hear, that this option is also available in SQL server 2008.

I am not expert, but I think this syntax will cause overhead if you insert many records. Maybe is better choice:
INSERT INTO ...
(col1, col2,...)
SELECT ...
FROM ...
UNION ALL
SELECT ...
FROM ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Denny and all.</p>
<p>It is good to hear, that this option is also available in SQL server 2008.</p>
<p>I am not expert, but I think this syntax will cause overhead if you insert many records. Maybe is better choice:<br />
INSERT INTO &#8230;<br />
(col1, col2,&#8230;)<br />
SELECT &#8230;<br />
FROM &#8230;<br />
UNION ALL<br />
SELECT &#8230;<br />
FROM &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
