<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Discussion on: EMC World 2008 Day 2</title>
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/emc-world-2008-day-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: EMC World 2008 Day 2</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/emc-world-2008-day-2/#comment-57</link>
		<author>EMC World 2008 Day 2</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/emc-world-2008-day-2/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>[...] goycp wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptWhat this means is that in the event of a fibre cut on either the front end or the back end the host machine (Server) will no longer need to trespass the LUN to the other SP. The LUN can simply send the IO request to the other SP. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] goycp wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptWhat this means is that in the event of a fibre cut on either the front end or the back end the host machine (Server) will no longer need to trespass the LUN to the other SP. The LUN can simply send the IO request to the other SP. &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
