 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QA #3 &#8211; Is Functional Testing sufficient to determine the Code Coverage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/software-testing-big-picture/qa-sharp-3-is-functional-testing-sufficient-to-determine-the-code-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/software-testing-big-picture/qa-sharp-3-is-functional-testing-sufficient-to-determine-the-code-coverage/</link>
	<description>A software tester's perspective on everything big &#38; small</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 18:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Shillu13</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/software-testing-big-picture/qa-sharp-3-is-functional-testing-sufficient-to-determine-the-code-coverage/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Shillu13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/software-testing-big-picture/?p=136#comment-26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks DanAtNCover. You have provided some good info.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks DanAtNCover. You have provided some good info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanAtNCover</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/software-testing-big-picture/qa-sharp-3-is-functional-testing-sufficient-to-determine-the-code-coverage/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>DanAtNCover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/software-testing-big-picture/?p=136#comment-19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great distinction, Shilpa.  

Traditionally code coverage products were relegated to the developer desktop environment.  More recently, products like NCover (measures managed processes) have expanded that understanding to directly include white box testing and indirectly support coverage analysis for black box testing (via monitoring child processes for test applications such as QTP, TestComplete, or AutomatedQA).

The confluence of emerging development processes (Agile, BDD, etc) and the measured improvement of QA initiatives seems to demand a flexing of what was once a novelty metric.  Further, many make the case that the best use of code coverage as an objective measurement of functional testing needs to include access to corollary cyclomatic complexity metrics.

By the way, NCover provides a no-strings-attached trial for anyone doing .NET development.  And if you are working on anything OSS, come ask us for a complimentary license.

Free Trial (http://www.ncover.com/trial)
Free License (conversations@ncover.com)

Cheers,

Dan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great distinction, Shilpa.  </p>
<p>Traditionally code coverage products were relegated to the developer desktop environment.  More recently, products like NCover (measures managed processes) have expanded that understanding to directly include white box testing and indirectly support coverage analysis for black box testing (via monitoring child processes for test applications such as QTP, TestComplete, or AutomatedQA).</p>
<p>The confluence of emerging development processes (Agile, BDD, etc) and the measured improvement of QA initiatives seems to demand a flexing of what was once a novelty metric.  Further, many make the case that the best use of code coverage as an objective measurement of functional testing needs to include access to corollary cyclomatic complexity metrics.</p>
<p>By the way, NCover provides a no-strings-attached trial for anyone doing .NET development.  And if you are working on anything OSS, come ask us for a complimentary license.</p>
<p>Free Trial (<a href="http://www.ncover.com/trial" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncover.com/trial</a>)<br />
Free License (conversations@ncover.com)</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
