IBM has closed the deal to purchase established logistics and optimization software vendor iLog. The purchase, at a price now estimated at $340 million, was originally announced last July. iLog will become a part of IBM’s WebSphere operation.
Over the years, Ilog fashioned a unique potpourri of a business rule engine line, optimization and logistical supply chain management lines, and a front-end component or ‘visualization’ software line that spans both the .NET and non-.NET worlds.
While the rules engine can be expected to garner initial attention, fitting neatly atop IBM’s Java application servers, the visualization offerings may surprise.
According to IBM’s Sandy Carter, the company has already been able to demonstrate use of the iLog visualization components, WebSphere and IBM’s BPM suites working together. Carter also sees the various iLog optimization tools greatly enhancing IBM BPM efforts.
This is a good buy for IBM. iLog has installed itself on the global optimization stage. Optimization may be a ‘bright’ spot as companies rejigger business plans in the face of global downturn. Its other parts are innovative and have added new potential as they become part of the larger IBM portfolio.
Unit testing is one of the essential elements that arose along with the agile design movement. Any self respecting developer now does unit tests, or at least the developer tells the architect that unit tests were done. Clearly, signing a manifesto does not mean a developer knows how to do unit tests correctly. Unit testing may be one of the great cases of lip service, today.
With SOA, unit testing takes on a whole new tenor. Composite applications may always be in flux. The fact that an application integrator is not in charge of all SOA system elements is inescapable. [see Application performance management today, part 3: SOA performance – SearchSoftwareQuality.com]
Related SOA test/performance info
Application performance management today, part 3: SOA performance – SearchSoftwareQuality.com
With all the blog enabled scuttlebutt ‘failed SOA,’ it is interesting to look at a SOA success story, albeit one that failed. Read on, Grasshopper! Continued »
Related “TV Web services” info
Yahoo Connected TV – Yahoo
Microformats have been described as a set open data format standards for structured blogging and web content publishing. They have been tried out, for example, in the realm of XHTML. One tenet of the microformat movement has been to try to work with existing architectures and patterns, sometimes described as ‘paving the cow paths’. Continued »
As part of a large company-wide drive, IBM even promotes SOA as a play in the area of Green (energy-saving) computing. The company just released a so-called SOA Sandbox project online trial that provides instructions for building an app that provides energy usage information to end-users. Various IBM modeling tools can be used in such initiatives. We recently discussed other issues of enterprise architecture, and how it can serve in varying SOA capacities. It’s a little ditty with charming title, ”On establishing the link between the business and SOA with modeling.”
Signs are beginning to appear pointing the way to SoaML, an OMG-backed specification meant to bring a new type of modeling capability to the service-oriented world.
SoaML’s goal is to provide SOA modeling of services within UML, without making changes to UML. As part of that, the spec seeks to support services architectures where different parties use multiple services and where services can be defined to contain other services. Mappings to business process specs are also in store, notably BPDM and BPMN.
Anyone concerned about an over-bearing top-down modeling regimen in SoaML can take heart in its claimed adherence to either top-down, bottom up or meet-in-the-middle modeling.
The SoaML has been percolating for awhile, with more details due in 2009. Just recently, a wiki of sorts has been formed for all things SoaML. A complete working doc is available as a PDF from OMG. And for the over-the-top would-be SoaML enthusiast there is a background feature on the making of the SoaML logo on the Yaya-Colour blog.
We have heard the story of aligning IT and development before, haven’t we? That the story is told over and over does not make it a bad story per se. Some stories bear retelling. If the details change over time, that is helpful.
I mention this while perusing one of the more useful BPM-related blogs. That is Bruce Silver’s BPMS Watch. There have been significant changes in BPM in recent years, and a new notations for workflow description are among them. Silver’s site, and his accompanying columns for the BPMInstitute.org cover this and other ground quite well.
Recently Silver wrote about BPMN as ‘the first serious attempt to provide a common visual language for process description shared by business and IT.’ Well, I don’t know. Journalists very seldom call something the ‘first’ of anything. It is a sure way to get mail from an irate someone who built something before someone else. But irate mail’s a good thing, especially on the blogosphere, so I will let this stand, although I’d have to add that I did hear UML described this way more than once upon a time.
Despite years of work on Web services standards, interoperability remains a bugaboo. Continued »
Object expert, refactoring maven and all around software process guru Martin Fowler took a look at the notion of registries recently, particularly the notion of automated registry service look up. Martin Fowler is an eminent technologist – and like the old broker E.F. Hutton, when Martin Fowlder talks, people listen. Continued »