Hey everyone, first things first: Did you give your mother a Private Cloud for Mother’s Day? Ok, now on with the show.
The blogosphere was abuzz with IBM Impact chatter last week. Much centered on the company’s announcement of the CloudBurst private cloud appliance. But there was a lot of guff about IBM’ BPM BlueWorks business modeling as a cloud service as well. There is not a full consensus on ‘what the cloud is’ or ‘what BPM in the cloud is,’ by any means. Guess that makes it interesting. Continued »
Russell Irwin of Standard Life lists SOA savings and benefits over several years. Still, he cautions software architects to right-size their first SOA efforts. Don’t start with the Holy Grail, he suggested in a presentation at IBM’s Impact Smart SOA Conference 2009 in Las Vegas.
By Jack Vaughan
Packing a one-two punch, Cobol and mainframe modernization specialist MicroFocus today said it will acquire Borland for about $75 million in cash at the same time it buys Compuware’s testing and quality assurance software business for about $58 million in cash.
In a statement, MicroFocus estimated that Borland achieved revenues of $172 million last year, while the Compuware Testing and ASQ Business achieved revenues of $74 million, in the twelve month period ending March 31.
The move clearly extends MicroFocus’ position in the software quality and application life cycle management market. Development stalwart Borland struggled in recent years as it launched multiple acquisitions and sought to transform from a desktop developer favorite into a broad-range application life-cycle software provider. The assets MicroFocus buys from Compuware include the former NuMega testing software line.
Analyst Dana Gardner suggests Compuware’s “Quality” portfolio divestiture leaves it more room to pursue modernization efforts in healthcare and other government IT environments.
Funny thing though, MicroFocus, which scooped up Borland and the quality/test portion of Compuware, is best known as a modernization concern.
IBM put on a SOAttitute party for the Impact conference faithful Wed night in Las Vegas. It was a welcome reprieve from the often gloomy daily news, and a harkening back to great techno days of yesteryear. Continued »
By Jack Vaughan
I would like to talk today about control theory, the economy, BPM, event processing and some other strangeness.
While reading a recent science journal I chanced upon a story on control theory and its limitations when applied to the world economy. In “Everything is Under Control” by Brian Hayes in American Scientist [May-Jun, 2009], the author discusses varieties of feedback control and then analyses how these might apply over some or the other snapshot of time to related feedback algorithms in the system that is the world economy.
This often controversial process – that is, converting the economic system into a divinable process – has never quite worked, and is under renewed scrutiny given large-scale economic turmoil at the moment. Put more simply: the world economy is in an uproar and no one seems quite to know why exactly, and few trust computer programming to figure a way out.
Anyway, what especially caught my attention in Hayes’ piece was a depiction of MONIAC, for Monetary National Income Analogue Computer, an early analog computer that was based on – get ready if you haven’t heard this one – hydraulics! Yes, water, rather than electrons was the goop that moved through this system. The MONIAC system has an unfortunate resemblance to an early toilet. Still, it was a valid stab at a solution for its time.
Which brings us to BPM. At heart it is a cousin to control theory. ‘Let’s figure out the process and put a master control upon it,’ the BPM practitioner, like the MONIAC developer, might say. As patently obvious as it may seem right now, BPM is full of streams and eddies that are yet to be discerned. There are many questions. How do rules engines interplay with BPM? How will front-end business modeling ever truly connect with ‘up-from-the-stack’ business process execution? Is BPM related to event processing?
Hard to easily ascertain questions – no doubt. But as we recently asked the last of these questions to Neil Ward-Dutton (of Macehiter Ward-Dutton Advisors fame) we share his thoughts here on event processing and BPM – and how tenuous their relation is.
Event processing might sound like something that you might use BPM technology for, but in practice it’s implemented quite differently because the runtime conditions in play (and hence the design philosophies) are very different.
BPM technology typically focuses on highly structured flows of work involving the coordination of multiple systems and/or people. Although there might be high throughput at runtime (in straight-through processing in financial trading scenarios, for example) those flows can be mapped out in advance and centrally orchestrated at runtime.
Event processing technology, in contrast, is optimized to detect, filter and analyse and then act on events that might occur in unpredictable ways, in unpredictable sequences, and at very high volumes in highly distributed environments.
Neil had more to say but here we’d forward you to Macehiter Ward-Dutton Advisors Web site for more analyses on issues of this era. Right on Neil! As well, you might check out the blog of Brian Hayes. My two cents worth: Brian Hayes is something of a national treasure. He continually finds worthy near-philosophical topics in the often dry dessert of computing and math. His work can be found in American Scientist, and on his blog http://bit-player.org/.
At an IBM press conference at the Impact Smart SOA Conference 2009 in Las Vegas the topic turned – briefly, albeit – to Oracle’s purchase of Sun.
Many have wondered about the future of Java in Oracle’s hands. What does IBM software leader Steve Mills think?
“I don’t believe we are going to see a fundamental change. I don’t have a concern,” said Mills. “Oracle obviously becomes the new steward, if you will.”
IBM has been said to be frustrated by the pace of standards related to Java. Mills said Oracle has felt those frustrations too. “Oracle has been among those thinking Sun could move more effectively,” he said.
Some individuals voiced concern about Sun in IBM’s portfolio; reportedly, the companies seriously pursued a merger that did not happen. Still others worried about Sun in Oracle’s suite. Mills voiced no such distress.
Mills pointed to the fact that many companies licensee Java as a leavening factor for Java going forward.
“We think the forces at play in the market will keep Java as something standard and consistent and widely deployed,” he told those gathered at the Impact press conference.
AmberPoint has been busy, announcing support this week for Microsoft BizTalk Server 2009, and, earlier in the month, announcing integration with IBM WebSphere DataPower. We talked with the company recently. Continued »
RSS and Atom are among the most useful elements to emerge from the XML and Web services revolution that occurred over the last 10 years. Who’d have thunk it? RSS seemed a small part of an XML initially, but has since become incredibly ubiquitous. Now, the world of syndication may be poised for another leap forward. Continued »
Over the years, the Federal government has had considerable influence in seeking to define the role of Enterprise Architect. As a new administration gets rolling in Washington, there is some chance that its approach to hiring a new chief federal CIO and CTO will affect future trends in EA. The CIO and CTO positions have been filled with Vivek Kundra and Aneesh Chopra, respectively. Seers of the tea leaves of technology have pondered those choices, and hit the blogs running. Continued »
A recent piece SearchSOA.com ran on the mega merger of Oracle and Sun heard from a number of users who saw a better competitive situation with Sun in the Oracle camp, as opposed to being the IBM camp. The takes are not all positive, however.
“I am not terribly happy with it,” said Reza Rahman, Independent Consultant and EJB specialist. “I would rather have seen a Sun-HP merger.”
“Sun merging with Oracle really cuts down the competitiveness in the application server market specifically and the software development market generally,” he said.
Some of Rahman’s concerns revolve around Glassfish, a Java server implementation that Sun appeared finally ready to run with.
“This basically takes Glassfish off the table. I expect it will basically be assimilated into the Oracle portfolio,” Rahman told me.
Still, Rahman concedes, Sun was in trouble, and, in turn, Java was in trouble.
He said: “This is preferable to the present situation where we have a weak Sun. It is just not a good situation as far as competiveness and innovation in the Java space goes.” It was not good to rely on a company with weak resources to lead the efforts for Java-based standards.