 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware will cut hypervisor prices, says virtualization guru Chris Wolf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-will-cut-hypervisor-prices-says-virtualization-guru-chris-wolf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-will-cut-hypervisor-prices-says-virtualization-guru-chris-wolf/</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com and SearchVMware.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:14:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: VMRacer</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-will-cut-hypervisor-prices-says-virtualization-guru-chris-wolf/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>VMRacer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/05/27/vmware-will-cut-hypervisor-prices-says-virtualization-guru-chris-wolf/#comment-1424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Either way you look at it, VMware&#039;s products are more expensive than anyone else&#039;s.  That&#039;s OK for now, because VMware&#039;s products are better and you get more features.  The other vendors are catching up quickly, however.  Even if their technology isn&#039;t quite up to par with VMware&#039;s, they will offer enterprise grade features at a lower cost.  IT shops that don&#039;t need all the bells and whistles of VMware will go for the lower cost.

If VMware wants be stay the top vendor and maintain their market share, they will have to do something - either lower prices or push the edge technologically!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either way you look at it, VMware&#8217;s products are more expensive than anyone else&#8217;s.  That&#8217;s OK for now, because VMware&#8217;s products are better and you get more features.  The other vendors are catching up quickly, however.  Even if their technology isn&#8217;t quite up to par with VMware&#8217;s, they will offer enterprise grade features at a lower cost.  IT shops that don&#8217;t need all the bells and whistles of VMware will go for the lower cost.</p>
<p>If VMware wants be stay the top vendor and maintain their market share, they will have to do something &#8211; either lower prices or push the edge technologically!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMGirl</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-will-cut-hypervisor-prices-says-virtualization-guru-chris-wolf/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>VMGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/05/27/vmware-will-cut-hypervisor-prices-says-virtualization-guru-chris-wolf/#comment-1423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware&#039;s Hypervisor (ESX) is already inexpensive and right in line with other virtualization vendors.  VMware only charges additional for management and automation functionality the competition has yet to provide.  The cost is higher because the value is high.  If you&#039;re simply looking to run multiple workloads on a single server host, the cost is minimal.  Look for Foundation or Standard licensing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware&#8217;s Hypervisor (ESX) is already inexpensive and right in line with other virtualization vendors.  VMware only charges additional for management and automation functionality the competition has yet to provide.  The cost is higher because the value is high.  If you&#8217;re simply looking to run multiple workloads on a single server host, the cost is minimal.  Look for Foundation or Standard licensing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
