Comments on: VMware: Sorry for the Hyper-V crash video, Microsoft http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-sorry-for-the-hyper-v-crash-video-microsoft/ A SearchServerVirtualization.com and SearchVMware.com blog Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:14:56 +0000 hourly 1 By: YellowBricks http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-sorry-for-the-hyper-v-crash-video-microsoft/#comment-1593 YellowBricks Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:40:30 +0000 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/?p=1459#comment-1593 Hey JohnnyG77, the reply from Bruce was already posted a month ago or so. It appears that the blog has been reposted but the post was already there. Jeff even referred to it in his 3rd post. So the apology was posted a month later and not 2 days.

]]> By: JohnnyG77 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-sorry-for-the-hyper-v-crash-video-microsoft/#comment-1592 JohnnyG77 Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:48:57 +0000 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/?p=1459#comment-1592 After 1.5 months of silence after being ousted…VMWare finally posted their “methodology” on June 8th, 2009…then 2 days later Scott apologized on June 10th.

Too bad their posted “methodology” was also completely bogus, IMHO. I hope the same methodology can now be applied to public comparison benchmarks of VMWare and other Hypervisors to be released to the public…as long as it uses similar “VMWare approved” methodology that Bruce posted.

]]> By: Jtroyer http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-sorry-for-the-hyper-v-crash-video-microsoft/#comment-1591 Jtroyer Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:40:46 +0000 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/?p=1459#comment-1591 I don’t want to draw this out, but re the TimC comment – Bruce did post details http://bit.ly/C4y69

]]>