<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware shipping yet another lifecycle management product</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-shipping-yet-another-lifecycle-management-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-shipping-yet-another-lifecycle-management-product/</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: virtualbill</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-shipping-yet-another-lifecycle-management-product/#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator>virtualbill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/03/31/vmware-shipping-yet-another-lifecycle-management-product/#comment-1377</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if they thought about the lifecyle of a VM across roles versus having 3 products to tackle the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if they thought about the lifecyle of a VM across roles versus having 3 products to tackle the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->