<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware Server 2.0 at First Blush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-server-20-at-first-blush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-server-20-at-first-blush/</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Shearer</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmware-server-20-at-first-blush/#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shearer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/11/27/vmware-server-20-at-first-blush/#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>The most serious issue I see with VMWare server 2.0 is its lack of 64bit support for Windows.

http://windows2008.informedcio.com/2008/01/01/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-about-vmware-server-20-beta-1.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most serious issue I see with VMWare server 2.0 is its lack of 64bit support for Windows.<br />
&nbsp;&lt;a href="http://windows2008.informedcio.com/2008/01/01/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-about-vmware-server-20-beta-1.aspx" title="http://windows2008.informedcio.com/2008/01/01/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-about-vmware-server-20-beta-1.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;http://windows2008.informedcio.com/2008/&#8230;&lt;/a&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->