The Virtualization Room

May 5 2009   7:36PM GMT

VMware engineers caution IT pros: Use Fault Tolerance sparingly

Bridget Botelho Bridget Botelho Profile: Bridget Botelho

Tags:
Virtualization

One of the most anticipated features in the next version of VMware Virtual Infrastructure, vSphere, is Fault Tolerance, but VMware engineers caution IT pros to use it sparingly.

During the New England VMware User Group meeting in Newport, RI on April 30, VMware engineers who gave a session called “What’s Next for VMware Virtual Infrastructure” said not to use the upcoming fault tolerance (FT) feature as a general replacement for High Availability because it requires more resources. Instead, only use it where absolutely no downtime can be tolerated.

“To use it, you have to allocate extra resources, and it is a noticeable and significant – you need between 20-30% extra capacity.” VMware has not revealed exactly how much latency results from using its Fault Tolerance feature yet, but engineers said, “You have to expect some latency with the fault tolerance feature, and we continue to work on that.”

Despite its downfalls, fault tolerance is an important feature for IT Pros running mission critical applications on VMs, especially if there are numerous important VMs on a single box, in which case eliminating the risk of losing those VMs during a host failure is critically important. “In most cases the benefits of fault tolerance outweigh the downfalls,” a VMware engineer told attendees.

VMware Fault Tolerance diagramVMware FT is based on what VMware calls vLockstep technology, which works by having a secondary virtual machine (VM) make an instruction mirror of the first VM on a different physical box, so if a physical component fails, the mirrored VM kicks on and operations continue as if nothing happened.

The two ESX hosts used in FT must share storage systems, and require extra RAM, CPU and I/O capacity, the VMware engineers said.

VMware FT uses VMware HA clusters of up to 16 servers, and any number of VMs in a cluster can be protected with VMware FT.

VMware’s FT feature will be included in vSphere Advanced Edition, which is priced at $2,245 per single processor. The company has yet to announce an official release date.

.

1  Comment on this Post

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when other members comment.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
  • MikeLaverick
    I'm suprised they set the value so high. Private-beta webcasts put the value more around the 10% mark. I don't think at the end of the day the overhead is perhaps the most significant limitation on FT to date. Most customers accept you don't get something for nothing when it comes to feature like VMotion, SVMotion and FT. What will make FT tricky - is two things - the conversion of the virtual disks they already have to zeroedthick to eagerzeroedthick. The fact that FT only supports 1-vCPU when many critical systems that would suit FT are using vSMP. And last the bandwidth required for the FT Logging network - in addition to their VMotion pipes..... The message is the product. Enable HA it protect ALL VMs in the cluster, but FT is enabled on per-VM basis...
    55 pointsBadges:
    report

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: