<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viridian - Better Late than&#8230; Early?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/viridian-better-late-than-early/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/viridian-better-late-than-early/</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enno Rey</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/viridian-better-late-than-early/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Enno Rey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/04/12/viridian-better-late-than-early/#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>Greg,

&#62; VMware has been thinking about security for some time.

hmm... ah, really? that's why they ship ESX-Server 2.54 with users "games" and "gopher" in /etc/passwd, with SSLCiphers like "ALL:!ADH:!EXP56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP:+eNULL", lots of unnecessary packages and, last but not least, reproducible segfaults in the console sw (which I will not comment on further here, due to our disclosure policy)?
c'mon... you must be kidding. Their products were focused on functionality (and they really succeed here from a technical and market share standpoint), but they haven't cared about security for quite a long time. Maybe now as the market demands for it...
[and, yes, I know your product ;-)]

thanks,

Enno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p>
<p>&gt; VMware has been thinking about security for some time.</p>
<p>hmm&#8230; ah, really? that&#8217;s why they ship ESX-Server 2.54 with users &#8220;games&#8221; and &#8220;gopher&#8221; in /etc/passwd, with SSLCiphers like &#8220;ALL:!ADH:!EXP56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP:+eNULL&#8221;, lots of unnecessary packages and, last but not least, reproducible segfaults in the console sw (which I will not comment on further here, due to our disclosure policy)?<br />
c&#8217;mon&#8230; you must be kidding. Their products were focused on functionality (and they really succeed here from a technical and market share standpoint), but they haven&#8217;t cared about security for quite a long time. Maybe now as the market demands for it&#8230;<br />
[and, yes, I know your product ;-)]</p>
<p>thanks,</p>
<p>Enno</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/viridian-better-late-than-early/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/04/12/viridian-better-late-than-early/#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>VMware leads in market share but also appears to have taken the lead in thinking about the security impacts of virtualization in production environments.  It's one thing to ship... another to deliver production-ready security.  VMware has been thinking about security for some time (when it comes to virtualization).  Has anyone seen MSFT comment of virtualization and its unique security requirements or address the new challenges via partner ecosystem?

Sincerely,
Greg

Greg Ness
Blue Lane Technologies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware leads in market share but also appears to have taken the lead in thinking about the security impacts of virtualization in production environments.  It&#8217;s one thing to ship&#8230; another to deliver production-ready security.  VMware has been thinking about security for some time (when it comes to virtualization).  Has anyone seen MSFT comment of virtualization and its unique security requirements or address the new challenges via partner ecosystem?</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Greg</p>
<p>Greg Ness<br />
Blue Lane Technologies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->