<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Virtualization Room &#187; Salesforce.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/tag/salesforcecom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com and SearchVMware.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 20:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>What does VMforce mean for virtualization?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/what-does-vmforce-mean-for-virtualization/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/what-does-vmforce-mean-for-virtualization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salesforce.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/?p=1626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For most of the past decade, VMware was synonymous with virtualization. When you thought about virtualization, you thought about VMware and no one else. That&#8217;s changing now, as Microsoft, Citrix and others chip away in the hypervisor market. And when you thought about VMware, you thought virtualization and nothing else. That too is changing now, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For most of the past decade, VMware was synonymous with virtualization.</p>
<p>When you thought about virtualization, you thought about VMware and no one else. That&#8217;s changing now, as Microsoft, Citrix and others chip away in the hypervisor market.</p>
<p>And when you thought about VMware, you thought virtualization and nothing else. That too is changing now, as today&#8217;s <a href="http://searchcloudcomputing.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid201_gci1510412,00.html">VMforce news</a> shows.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been hearing it for a while now: VMware doesn&#8217;t want to be just a virtualization company anymore. Well, that day is finally here. Still, VMforce has got to mean something for virtualization, right?</p>
<p><span id="more-1626"></span>At first glance, a lot of people would say no. VMforce is a Java application development and hosting platform, and it&#8217;s not really something that admins will come across in their day-to-day duties. As blogger and systems engineer <a href="http://twitter.com/KendrickColeman/status/12944833147" target="_blank">Kendrick Coleman</a> said to me on Twitter this morning, &#8220;It means nothing to me because I&#8217;m not a developer.&#8221;</p>
<p>VMware CEO Paul Maritz shares a different view. He said in this morning&#8217;s <a href="http://www.vmware.com/company/news/releases/vmforce.html" target="_blank">VMforce press release</a> that VMforce will tie in with the private and hybrid cloud models that many businesses are considering. Sure, the whole part about VMforce being a &#8220;dramatically simplified solution for modern application development&#8221; isn&#8217;t going to excite many admins.</p>
<p>But then there&#8217;s the part about applications that &#8220;can scale automatically. VMforce customers will not have to worry about scaling up app servers, databases or infrastructure to meet performance demand.&#8221; Now we&#8217;re cookin&#8217; with virtualization gas!</p>
<p>Scalability is one of the biggest benefits of virtualization. If you want to deploy a new application, you can simply provision a new VM instead of rolling out a whole new physical server. Of course, there are some potential gotchas. If you provision VMs left and right, you can find yourself with a serious case of <a href="http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid94_gci1375949,00.html">VM sprawl</a>. And despite workarounds like <a href="http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid94_gci1371341,00.html">memory overcommit</a>, you&#8217;re still limited to the physical capabilities of your infrastructure.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re an admin who has dealt with these kinds of problems, especially with a lot of your custom apps, don&#8217;t ignore the VMforce news. With this <a href="http://searchcloudcomputing.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid201_gci1332892,00.html">Platform as a Service</a> model, the service provider is responsible for meeting your users&#8217; demand &#8212; which means you don&#8217;t have to worry about provisioning and decommissioning VMs or overloading your servers.</p>
<p>Is VMforce going to change the world for admins? No. But it may be able to help solve some problems. VMware isn&#8217;t solely focused on virtualization anymore. We shouldn&#8217;t be either.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/what-does-vmforce-mean-for-virtualization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMforce: Cloud 2? I was just getting used to Cloud 1!</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmforce-cloud-2-i-was-just-getting-used-to-cloud-1/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmforce-cloud-2-i-was-just-getting-used-to-cloud-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Steele</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salesforce.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/?p=1623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, no, no! It can&#8217;t be! Please tell me it&#8217;s not true! I used to hate the term &#8220;cloud computing&#8221; &#8212; like, in a &#8220;I totally despise this phrase and will go to the ends of the Earth to avoid using it&#8221; kind of way. I thought it was another meaningless phrase, ripped from the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no, no! It can&#8217;t be! Please tell me it&#8217;s not true!</p>
<p>I used to hate the term &#8220;cloud computing&#8221; &#8212; like, in a &#8220;I totally despise this phrase and will go to the ends of the Earth to avoid using it&#8221; kind of way. I thought it was another meaningless phrase, ripped from the marketing-ese dictionary to generate hype.</p>
<p>But over time I realized I was fighting a losing battle, and that cloud computing was catching on &#8212; not just as a term, but as an actual IT strategy. And as an added bonus, it relies on everyone&#8217;s favorite technology, <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/virtualization-aint-goin-out-like-that/">virtualization</a>!</p>
<p>It still seems a little silly to say something is in &#8220;the cloud,&#8221; like it&#8217;s this magical, ethereal place, when it&#8217;s really just someone&#8217;s else data center (or even your own, if we&#8217;re talking about private cloud). But whatever, I can deal with it.</p>
<p>So imagine my dismay when I started reading about today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.vmware.com/company/news/releases/vmforce.html" target="_blank">Salesforce.com and VMware</a> news, and I saw a new buzzword staring me in the face: &#8220;Cloud 2.&#8221; I felt like kneeling down, looking up to the heavens as rain poured down, and screaming, &#8220;WHY?!?!?!?!?&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-1623"></span>Unless you&#8217;ve been living in a cave (the opposite of a cloud), you know that Salesforce.com and VMware announced <a href="http://searchcloudcomputing.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid201_gci1510412,00.html">VMforce</a> today. Basically, VMforce is a Java development platform, hosted in the cloud. The major components are the Spring platform, which VMware acquired last year, and Salesforce.com&#8217;s Force.com platform. And the goal is to get developers building social, mobile and collaborative applications for businesses and organizations.</p>
<p>These are the so-called &#8220;Cloud 2 apps,&#8221; as Salesforce.com CEO Marc Benioff called them in the press release. I understand the companies want to set themselves apart from the rest of the cloud crowd (try saying &#8220;cloud crowd&#8221; three times fast, by the way), but when you look at it, they&#8217;re APPS developed and run in the CLOUD. Let&#8217;s just call them &#8220;cloud apps&#8221; and spare everyone another buzzword.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/vmforce-cloud-2-i-was-just-getting-used-to-cloud-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
