<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red Hat virtualization: No Windows Server 2008, RHEL management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/red-hat-virtualization-no-winserver-2008-rhel-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/red-hat-virtualization-no-winserver-2008-rhel-management/</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Silverroad</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/red-hat-virtualization-no-winserver-2008-rhel-management/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>Silverroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/red-hat-virtualization-no-winserver-2008-rhel-management/#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>What's the big issue then? Enterprise customers should not need  more than one instantiation of the manager and can even run it within as a guest on rhel KVM. Having a manager on 2003 vs. 2008 is not a big issue. The bigger deal is requiring a closed source .net application to run the environment at all. I understand that this will be addressed though.

I apologize for tone of the previous post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the big issue then? Enterprise customers should not need  more than one instantiation of the manager and can even run it within as a guest on rhel KVM. Having a manager on 2003 vs. 2008 is not a big issue. The bigger deal is requiring a closed source .net application to run the environment at all. I understand that this will be addressed though.</p>
<p>I apologize for tone of the previous post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Steele</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/red-hat-virtualization-no-winserver-2008-rhel-management/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/red-hat-virtualization-no-winserver-2008-rhel-management/#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>That is what I wrote. The second and seventh paragraphs both say that these requirements are for the management servers. There's no mention of guests in this post at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is what I wrote. The second and seventh paragraphs both say that these requirements are for the management servers. There&#8217;s no mention of guests in this post at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silverroad</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/red-hat-virtualization-no-winserver-2008-rhel-management/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>Silverroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/red-hat-virtualization-no-winserver-2008-rhel-management/#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>Huh? Windows  2008 Guests ARE supported. Do the research before you post? The MANAGEMENT console needs to be 2003.  Get it right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? Windows  2008 Guests ARE supported. Do the research before you post? The MANAGEMENT console needs to be 2003.  Get it right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->