<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opalis intros virtualization automation tool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/opalis-intros-virtualization-automation-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/opalis-intros-virtualization-automation-tool/</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com and SearchVMware.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:14:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Evans</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/opalis-intros-virtualization-automation-tool/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/09/04/opalis-intros-virtualization-automation-tool/#comment-1233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enigmatec have been doing this for the past 12-18 months, also it doesn&#039;t seem to do half as much as the Enigmatec solution EVO. I think Opalis may be a bit behind when it comes to automating &amp; managing VMWare. Enigmatec is a much more comprehensive solution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enigmatec have been doing this for the past 12-18 months, also it doesn&#8217;t seem to do half as much as the Enigmatec solution EVO. I think Opalis may be a bit behind when it comes to automating &amp; managing VMWare. Enigmatec is a much more comprehensive solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
