 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft to ship Hyper-V &#8230; finally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/microsoft-to-ship-hyper-v-finally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/microsoft-to-ship-hyper-v-finally/</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com and SearchVMware.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:14:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Barrett</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/microsoft-to-ship-hyper-v-finally/#comment-1447</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/06/25/microsoft-to-ship-hyper-v-finally/#comment-1447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My bad on the order in which the VMware and Microsoft hosted products were offered at no cost; thanks guys for pointing it out. As far as quick migration, I never said it was cut from Hyper-V; if you go back and reread my post, I called it a &quot;feature clarification.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad on the order in which the VMware and Microsoft hosted products were offered at no cost; thanks guys for pointing it out. As far as quick migration, I never said it was cut from Hyper-V; if you go back and reread my post, I called it a &#8220;feature clarification.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janique</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/microsoft-to-ship-hyper-v-finally/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>Janique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/06/25/microsoft-to-ship-hyper-v-finally/#comment-1448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are going to skewer Microsoft for virtualization technology fumbles, you should avoid reporting fumbles. Microsoft cut the Live Migration feature out of Hyper-V, not Quick Migration. Quick Migration is supported in the Hyper-V release.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are going to skewer Microsoft for virtualization technology fumbles, you should avoid reporting fumbles. Microsoft cut the Live Migration feature out of Hyper-V, not Quick Migration. Quick Migration is supported in the Hyper-V release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeeWee</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/microsoft-to-ship-hyper-v-finally/#comment-1446</link>
		<dc:creator>JeeWee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/06/25/microsoft-to-ship-hyper-v-finally/#comment-1446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please stay to facts that VMware first gave the hosted product for free where MS followed with Virtual Server.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please stay to facts that VMware first gave the hosted product for free where MS followed with Virtual Server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/microsoft-to-ship-hyper-v-finally/#comment-1445</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/06/25/microsoft-to-ship-hyper-v-finally/#comment-1445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;ll find that VMware server was released as a free product priot to Microsoft Virtual server being released - by about 2 weeks.

It&#039;s a small point - but does illustrate that for once Microsoft is being &quot;out microsofted&quot; by a new competitor - and about time too]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ll find that VMware server was released as a free product priot to Microsoft Virtual server being released &#8211; by about 2 weeks.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a small point &#8211; but does illustrate that for once Microsoft is being &#8220;out microsofted&#8221; by a new competitor &#8211; and about time too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
