Comments on: Happy new version, VMware!

By: emzy

emzy — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:30:24 +0000

I don’t know about SDK or VCB, but in VI4 VC and ESX are using the same version —> 4

By: jamie

jamie — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:10:40 +0000

so we run 90% percent vi where i work (15 hosts, 60-somethign vm’s. i can relate to this. i hate the version crap, so do the server admins i have to explain them to. wtf? i agree, get the heck on the proper versioning bandwagon. (and dont ask about licensing. academic and enterprise, talk about one messsed up vmlic.lic file!

By: Inaki Borrero

Inaki Borrero — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:37:05 +0000

Yes, it is a funny article, and there is some truth about it: too many releases in too short and new products… kind of messy.

Btw, also Converter 4.0 for cold migration skipped!
Anyway I believe it is a great product, as long as you only use what you really need!

By: John Troyer

John Troyer — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:41:49 +0000

I think the haters of this article need to get a sense of humor.

Andrew, you forgot updates - Converter is at 3.0.2 Update 1, and if you haven’t updated to ESX 3.5, you are running ESX 3.0.2 Update 1 and VC 2.0.2 Update 3.

Where’s the VC plugin that can track this? This is a critical gap in our platform!

By: Schley Andrew Kutz

Schley Andrew Kutz — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:16:30 +0000

If Hyper-V or XenServer start having version nuttiness I’ll call them out too.

By: Jose

Jose — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:33:00 +0000

it is the same with windows (how many versions?)

do you identify know the citrix products???

may be VMware is innovating you know

btw, I am an independent consultant, and a really know all the virtualization products (VMware, Citrix, VirtualIron, OracleVM, SunxVM, Virtualbox, etc)