<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consolidation ratios are yesterday&#8217;s news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/consolidation-ratios-are-yesterdays-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/consolidation-ratios-are-yesterdays-news/</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: KenLC</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/consolidation-ratios-are-yesterdays-news/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>KenLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/?p=1386#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>All the points are valid.  However, compression ratios are probably what is going to justify the move to virtualization in the first place. If you can't get the project approved, it is hard to get to all of those other nice thngs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the points are valid.  However, compression ratios are probably what is going to justify the move to virtualization in the first place. If you can&#8217;t get the project approved, it is hard to get to all of those other nice thngs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->