<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citrix and Xen &#8211; the Fruity Flavored Path to Nirvana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/citrix-and-xen-the-fruity-flavored-path-to-nirvana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/citrix-and-xen-the-fruity-flavored-path-to-nirvana/</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com and SearchVMware.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:14:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Foran</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/citrix-and-xen-the-fruity-flavored-path-to-nirvana/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Foran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/08/21/citrix-and-xen-the-fruity-flavored-path-to-nirvana/#comment-1231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks - I saw that, and I also saw today&#039;s article about the 45-60 day time frame for Citrix to give details on their intentions. Sometimes the wait between submission and posting has some interesting consequences - I wrote this about a week before it was posted, on the day the acquisition was announced. I&#039;m glad Citrix has committed to getting information out there quickly; it&#039;s a turbulent acquisition for customers of Virtual Iron and other Xen-related products like Enomoly, which while good for the industry has a lot of people shaking their heads and wondering what the next step is going to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; I saw that, and I also saw today&#8217;s article about the 45-60 day time frame for Citrix to give details on their intentions. Sometimes the wait between submission and posting has some interesting consequences &#8211; I wrote this about a week before it was posted, on the day the acquisition was announced. I&#8217;m glad Citrix has committed to getting information out there quickly; it&#8217;s a turbulent acquisition for customers of Virtual Iron and other Xen-related products like Enomoly, which while good for the industry has a lot of people shaking their heads and wondering what the next step is going to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Crosby</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/citrix-and-xen-the-fruity-flavored-path-to-nirvana/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/08/21/citrix-and-xen-the-fruity-flavored-path-to-nirvana/#comment-1232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe

See www.virtualization.info today, for answers to a lot of the good questions you pose.  Nutshell: good for Xen, good for XenSource, good for server virtualization, and strategically very interesting for a future virtualized client market.

Regards

Simon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.virtualization.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualization.info</a> today, for answers to a lot of the good questions you pose.  Nutshell: good for Xen, good for XenSource, good for server virtualization, and strategically very interesting for a future virtualized client market.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
