<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buying servers for virtual machines? Think blades</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/buying-servers-for-virtual-machines-think-blades/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/buying-servers-for-virtual-machines-think-blades/</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Franko Davidson</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/buying-servers-for-virtual-machines-think-blades/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>Franko Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/02/29/quick-overview-of-virtualization-on-blade-servers/#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>While I agree with some of your comments regarding blades for virtualization, one of the challenges is still memory scalability and cost.  The HPBL680c does hold 128GB of RAM, but is cost $300,000 with that much memory installed because the 8GB dimms are $28,000 a pair.  The same configuration in a DL580G5 costs about $65,000 and has more memory, i/o and disk capacity as a bonus.  Blades are becoming better for virtualization, but for large scale installations greater than 24 processors in a virtualization farm, 4-socket or even better 8-socket x86 servers still yield a far better TCO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with some of your comments regarding blades for virtualization, one of the challenges is still memory scalability and cost.  The HPBL680c does hold 128GB of RAM, but is cost $300,000 with that much memory installed because the 8GB dimms are $28,000 a pair.  The same configuration in a DL580G5 costs about $65,000 and has more memory, i/o and disk capacity as a bonus.  Blades are becoming better for virtualization, but for large scale installations greater than 24 processors in a virtualization farm, 4-socket or even better 8-socket x86 servers still yield a far better TCO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Delp</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/buying-servers-for-virtual-machines-think-blades/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Delp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/02/29/quick-overview-of-virtualization-on-blade-servers/#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>Hello Rick - I linked to your article and added my two cents over at my site.  Thanks!

http://www.bladevault.info/2008/03/07/are-blades-the-next-pizza-box-esx-servers/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Rick - I linked to your article and added my two cents over at my site.  Thanks!<br />
&nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.bladevault.info/2008/03/07/are-blades-the-next-pizza-box-esx-servers/" title="http://www.bladevault.info/2008/03/07/are-blades-the-next-pizza-box-esx-servers/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.bladevault.info/2008/03/07/ar&#8230;&lt;/a&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->