<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adding virtualization to the PCI standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/adding-virtualization-to-the-pci-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/adding-virtualization-to-the-pci-standard/</link>
	<description>A SearchServerVirtualization.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Travis Smith</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/server-virtualization/adding-virtualization-to-the-pci-standard/#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servervirtualization.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/11/17/adding-virtualization-to-the-pci-standard/#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>I wrote about this a few weeks back.  I believe that this is a huge plus for the PCI standard, and frankly I am surprised it took so long for virtual machines to be included with the standard.  Unfortunately, some IT departments don't understand that data loss prevention doesn't stop with what's written in the standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about this a few weeks back.  I believe that this is a huge plus for the PCI standard, and frankly I am surprised it took so long for virtual machines to be included with the standard.  Unfortunately, some IT departments don&#8217;t understand that data loss prevention doesn&#8217;t stop with what&#8217;s written in the standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->