Server Farming

ACRHIVED. Please visit our new blog at: http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/data-center/

» VIEW ALL POSTS Apr 6 2010   1:31PM GMT

Cisco UCS news: Blah, blah, blah?



Posted by: Mark Fontecchio
Tags:
AMD
Cisco UCS
Data Center
Intel
x86 processor

Our sister site SearchITChannel has a story up today on whether Cisco’s Unified Computing System (UCS) is as good a fit in existing data centers as it is in new facilities.

Cisco, of course, contends that UCS can work just as well in existing facilities. In the story, one mid-Atlantic value added reseller (VAR) talked about the challenges of installing UCS in existing data centers.

The mid-Atlantic VAR, who is affiliated with both HP and Cisco, agreed that Cisco UCS is a tougher sell into existing data center facilities, and that some Cisco gear is a harder sale than other Cisco gear. For example, Cisco’s rack server UCS can go into an existing data center more easily than the blade model because the rack doesn’t require the Nexus switch, he said.

Whether a customer already runs Cisco networking gear in the data center could be a big factor in the purchasing process. Those shops have already bought into the Cisco data center story at least to some extent, VARs said.

I took a briefing on the UCS news, which basically integrates the new Intel Nehalem and Nehalem-EX blade and rack servers into the product. It includes the company’s first four-socket servers, but does not yet include AMD-based servers.

“Intel is very clearly the performance leader, so we’re happy with Intel being our CPU provider,” Paul Durzan, a product director at Cisco, said.

And now, to the blah blah blah. When I and another reporter talked to Cisco, they sent along a PowerPoint presentation on the news. In addition to the slides, there were notes accompanying each one. On a slide at the end summarizing the news, the notes field starts off with “So why Cisco you ask” and then there are two bullet points, as follows:

  • Improve business agility and performance
  • Blah, blah, blah

Thanks for the laugh, Cisco!

 Comment on this Post

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when other members comment.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: