 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buzz’s Blog: On Web 3.0 and the Semantic Web &#187; non-destructive editing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/tag/non-destructive-editing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web</link>
	<description>Defining the necessary skills for future software professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 04:42:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>More on sound editing: DAWs vs. wave editors</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/more-on-sound-editing-daws-vs-wave-editors/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/more-on-sound-editing-daws-vs-wave-editors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 01:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger King</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[audio editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAWs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-destructive editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wave editors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editing Sound. We&#8217;re in a series of postings relating to editing sound. Previously. See the previous postings on  cleaning audio, selecting an audio editor, and a couple of basic audio editing principles.  We have also looked at the interface to a popular audio editor, Amadeus Pro, and at basic editing in Amadeus Pro. We looked at a free audio editor, Audacity, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Editing Sound.</strong></p>
<p><span>We&#8217;re in a series of postings relating to editing sound.</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Previously.</strong></span></p>
<p><span>See the previous postings on  <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/cleaning-voice-recordings-for-web-postings-3-great-products/">cleaning</a> audio, selecting an <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/great-and-inexpensive-sound-editors/">audio editor</a>, and a couple of basic <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/you-are-editing-sound-remember-the-two-cs/">audio editing principles</a>.  We have also looked at the interface to a popular audio editor, <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/editing-sound-a-look-at-the-amadeus-wave-editor/">Amadeus Pro</a>, and at basic editing in <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/more-on-audio-editing/">Amadeus Pro</a>. We looked at a free audio editor, Audacity, and how one of its effects can be used to <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/more-on-audio-editing-cleaning-in-the-free-amadeus-editor/">remove noise</a>.  Most r</span>ecently, we looked at the way that <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/vst-and-au-plugins-making-audio-editors-more-powerful/">VST and AU plugins</a> add power to sound editors.</p>
<p>Today, we look at a common question.</p>
<p><strong>What is the difference between a DAW and a wave editor?</strong></p>
<p>The products we have looked at so far are generally called audio editors or wave editors. These include Amadeus, Wavelab, Peak, Sound Forge, and Sound Studio.  See the links above.</p>
<p><strong>Highly multitrack.</strong></p>
<p>A Digital Audio Workstation (or DAW) is generally a far more complicated program.  A wave (or audio) editor usually can only handle one or two tracks of recordings, while a DAW might support ten or twenty or more tracks.</p>
<p><strong>Non-destructive editing.</strong></p>
<p>Wave editors are used (usually) to perform what is called destructive editing.</p>
<p>This is a term that is used with regard to a wide variety of media applications, and quite frankly, &#8220;non-destructive&#8221; editing tends to sound better to the average person.  Apple Aperture is a photo editor and manager that supports non-destructive editing, in that you can apply powerful effects to an image without risk of destroying the original image.</p>
<p>DAWs support non-destructive editing because the goal of a DAW is to support the sophisticated mixing of pre-existing sound tracks, as well as the application of special effects to sound tracks.  But a wave editor is used to make raw recordings and edit them into the sorts of useful tracks that might be imported into a DAW.</p>
<p><strong>Special effects, software instruments, and MIDI.</strong></p>
<p>We&#8217;ll look at these things in the next in this series of blog postings relating to audio editing.</p>
<p>But to wrap things up, here is a screenshot of a very popular DAW, Cubase, the same folks who make the WaveLab wave editor we have previously discussed:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-853" src="http://wordsbybuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/daw-1024x677.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="423" /></p>
<p><a href="http://wordsbybuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/daw.jpg"></a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/semantic-web/more-on-sound-editing-daws-vs-wave-editors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
