 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attacks against SSL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-wire-weekly/attacks-against-ssl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-wire-weekly/attacks-against-ssl/</link>
	<description>The cybersecurity industry’s premier podcasts featuring the latest information security news, interviews and information.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 02:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: shire_stalker</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-wire-weekly/attacks-against-ssl/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>shire_stalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securitywireweekly.blogs.techtarget.com/2009/02/25/attacks-against-ssl/#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fascinating conversation about the birth and development of ssl, and how it might have lost its way. I find it very interesting that while there have been a few updates to SSL technology -- such as bidding good riddance to the MD5 hash -- most have simply been aesthetic or administrative changes to attempt to focus more on that secure connection between two points (ie, reducing the chance of MITM). I&#039;m thinking particularly of EV SSL, which boasts a more robust vetting process from the CA and the &quot;unspoofable&quot; green url bar -- which are really just attempts to allow good ol&#039; SSL to do its job with more efficiency. And I agree that it&#039;s occasionally over-sold as a data protector, but the sheer number of phishing scams exploiting unknowledgeable users out there suggests that most folks aren&#039;t quite sure what SSL does or how to recognize that it&#039;s doing its job. Hopefully shifts in the technology (EV SSL included) will help remedy that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fascinating conversation about the birth and development of ssl, and how it might have lost its way. I find it very interesting that while there have been a few updates to SSL technology &#8212; such as bidding good riddance to the MD5 hash &#8212; most have simply been aesthetic or administrative changes to attempt to focus more on that secure connection between two points (ie, reducing the chance of MITM). I&#8217;m thinking particularly of EV SSL, which boasts a more robust vetting process from the CA and the &#8220;unspoofable&#8221; green url bar &#8212; which are really just attempts to allow good ol&#8217; SSL to do its job with more efficiency. And I agree that it&#8217;s occasionally over-sold as a data protector, but the sheer number of phishing scams exploiting unknowledgeable users out there suggests that most folks aren&#8217;t quite sure what SSL does or how to recognize that it&#8217;s doing its job. Hopefully shifts in the technology (EV SSL included) will help remedy that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
