 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Corner &#187; Zero-day exploit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/tag/zero-day-exploit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:54:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Bogus EFTPS Failure Notices are Result of AWeber Hack</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/bogus-eftps-failure-notices-are-result-of-aweber-hack/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/bogus-eftps-failure-notices-are-result-of-aweber-hack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spear phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero-day exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero-day vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/bogus-eftps-failure-notices-are-result-of-aweber-hack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got this from a friend of mine, Arindam Chakraborty, who is also a fellow Internet marketer: Warning About EFTPS Tax Phishing Emails!Like me and many, many other marketers, he uses AWeber Communications email marketing service to manage his subscriber lists. It seems that AWeber was hacked last Saturday. Here is their official notice: [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got this from a friend of mine, Arindam Chakraborty, who is also a fellow Internet marketer: <a href="http://arindamchakraborty.com/warning-eftps-tax-phishing-emails">Warning About EFTPS Tax Phishing Emails!</a>Like me and many, many other marketers, he uses AWeber Communications email marketing service to manage his subscriber lists. It seems that AWeber was hacked last Saturday. Here is their official notice: <a href="http://www.aweber.com/blog/uncategorized/data-accessed.htm">Email Subscriber Data Accessed; What We’re Doing About It</a>. Here&#8217;s an excerpt.</p>
<blockquote><p>Over the weekend, AWeber was the target of a deliberate and successful attempt to mine email addresses.</p>
<p>On Saturday, October 16th, an unknown person gained unauthorized access to databases containing email subscriber information.</p>
<p>This incident appears to be part of a broader series of similar  successful attacks on a number of email service providers (ESPs).</p></blockquote>
<p>This happened 2009 December as well:</p>
<blockquote><p>December 21, 2009</p>
<p>AWeber was recently the victim of an intentional attack to mine email addresses.</p>
<p>We’d like to take this opportunity to share what happened, what was (and was not) affected and what we’re doing as a result of this attack.</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently, the attackers found a zero-day vulnerability in AWeber&#8217;s systems, though they&#8217;re not saying exactly what that was:</p>
<blockquote><p>On a daily basis, a few thousand attempts are made to attack AWeber.  This sounds like a lot (and it is), but it’s no different at any other  sizable web-based application.</p>
<p>We use a combination of in-house and third-party security solutions  to scan our network for possible “holes” in security, and to monitor,  block and analyze the many attempts made to gain unauthorized access to  AWeber. On the whole, these solutions are very good at what they do and  this approach serves us well. Unfortunately, both the in-house and  third-party solutions failed to detect or stop this particular attack.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d sure like to know what those &#8220;third-party solutions&#8221; are so I can patch them if they exist on any of my clients&#8217; systems!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/bogus-eftps-failure-notices-are-result-of-aweber-hack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Announces Out-of-band Patch for Zero-day Flaw</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/microsoft-announces-out-of-band-patch-for-zero-day-flaw/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/microsoft-announces-out-of-band-patch-for-zero-day-flaw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero-day exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero-day vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/microsoft-announces-out-of-band-patch-for-zero-day-flaw/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft issued today &#8220;Microsoft Security Bulletin Advance Notification for December 2008.&#8221; The actual security bulletin will be released on December 17, 2008: Microsoft Security Bulletin Advance Notification for December 2008 Published: December 16, 2008 Microsoft Security Bulletin Advance Notification issued: December 16, 2008 Microsoft Security Bulletins to be issued: December 17, 2008 This is an [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft issued today &#8220;<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms08-dec.mspx">Microsoft Security Bulletin Advance Notification for December 2008</a>.&#8221; The actual security bulletin will be released on December 17, 2008:</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft Security Bulletin Advance Notification for December 2008<br />
Published: December 16, 2008</p>
<p>Microsoft Security Bulletin Advance Notification issued: December 16, 2008<br />
Microsoft Security Bulletins to be issued: December 17, 2008</p>
<p>This is an advance notification of an out-of-band security bulletin that Microsoft is intending to release on December 17, 2008.</p>
<p>This bulletin advance notification will be replaced with the revised December bulletin summary on December 17, 2008. The revised bulletin summary will include the out-of-band security bulletin as well as the security bulletins already released on December 9, 2008.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any statistics on how fast they&#8217;ve responded to zero-day flaws in the past, but this seems pretty quick to me.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/microsoft-announces-out-of-band-patch-for-zero-day-flaw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer Targeted by Zero-day Attack</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/internet-explorer-targeted-by-zero-day-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/internet-explorer-targeted-by-zero-day-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Critical update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Code Execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero-day exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero-day vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/internet-explorer-targeted-by-zero-day-attack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though Microsoft released the biggest batch of patches ever on Tuesday&#8211;28 flaws affecting Windows, Office, Internet Explorer, Visual Basic Active Controls and Windows Media Player, 23 of them rated “critical”&#8211;there&#8217;s no fix for a zero-day XML parser vulnerability that surfaced the same day. This was first reported by Robert McMillan of IDG News and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though Microsoft released the biggest batch of patches ever on Tuesday&#8211;28 flaws affecting Windows, Office, Internet Explorer, Visual Basic Active Controls and Windows Media Player, 23 of them rated “critical”&#8211;there&#8217;s no fix for a zero-day XML parser vulnerability that surfaced the same day. This was first <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/155190/new_web_attack_exploits_unpatched_ie_flaw.html">reported</a> by Robert McMillan of IDG News and was picked up quickly by other media. According to McMillan:</p>
<blockquote><p>The code exploits a bug in the way IE handles XML (Extensible Markup Language) and works on the browser about &#8220;one in three times,&#8221; Huang said in an instant message interview. For the attack to work, a victim must first visit a Web site that serves the malicious JavaScript code that takes advantage of the flaw. &#8230;</p>
<p>In attacks, the code drops a malicious program on the victim&#8217;s PC which then goes to download malicious software from various locations.</p></blockquote>
<p>According to a <a href="https://forums.symantec.com/t5/Vulnerabilities-Exploits/Yes-There-s-a-Zero-Day-Exploit-for-Internet-Explorer-Out-There/ba-p/371628;jsessionid=BF3CCE8C0E4EEA64FD39BB52966E0B7D#A180">blog post</a> by Symantec:</p>
<blockquote><p>The vulnerability is caused by a function that incorrectly frees a certain region of heap memory so that an attacker is able to control the EAX register with a specially crafted Unicode URL, which includes the magic &#8220;0x0A0A&#8221; value in it,&#8221; Elia Florio, a security researcher at Symantec, wrote&#8230;. </p>
<p>Symantec released the antivirus signature Bloodhound.Exploit.219 and IPS signature 23241 &#8211; HTTP MSIE Malformed XML BO to protect users against this exploit.</p></blockquote>
<p>I recommend that anyone using Symantec&#8217;s antivirus or IPS products, immediately perform an update. Furthermore, Symantec recommends blocking the following hosts which are apparently being used by the exploit to download and install other malware:</p>
<p>    •    wwwwyyyyy.cn<br />
    •    sllwrnm5.cn<br />
    •    baikec.cn<br />
    •    oiuytr.net<br />
    •    laoyang4.cn<br />
    •    cc4y7.cn</p>
<p>In its <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/961051.mspx">security advisory 961051</a>, Microsoft presents the following mitigating factors:</p>
<blockquote><p>• Protected Mode in Internet Explorer 7 and Internet Explorer 8 in Windows Vista limits the impact of the vulnerability.</p>
<p>•By default, Internet Explorer on Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008 runs in a restricted mode that is known as Enhanced Security Configuration. This mode sets the security level for the Internet zone to High. This is a mitigating factor for Web sites that you have not added to the Internet Explorer Trusted sites zone.</p>
<p>•An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the local user. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less affected than users who operate with administrative user rights.</p>
<p>•Currently known attacks cannot exploit this issue automatically through e-mail.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nevertheless, users should avoid using Internet Explorer and should instead use <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/software-for-secure-computing-firefox-noscript/">Firefox with the NoScript extension</a> installed until Microsoft issues a patch. We may see an out-of-cycle patch on this one according to the security advisory:</p>
<blockquote><p>We are actively investigating the vulnerability these attacks attempt to exploit. We will continue to monitor the threat environment and update this advisory if this situation changes. On completion of this investigation, Microsoft will take the appropriate action to protect our customers, which may include providing a solution through a service pack, our monthly security update release process, or an out-of-cycle security update, depending on customer needs.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, since I&#8217;m forced to use IE for certain applications in my job, <em>this</em> customer needs a patch as quickly as possible.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/internet-explorer-targeted-by-zero-day-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opera Zero-day Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/opera-zero-day-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/opera-zero-day-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Code Execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero-day exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero-day vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/opera-zero-day-vulnerability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just as Opera completed patches for critical vulnerabilities in its browser, researchers discovered another remote code execution bug. In its recent article, &#8220;Opera scrambles to quash zero-day bug in freshly-patched browser,&#8221; The Register reports: Among the bugs squashed in Opera 9.61 was a stored cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that allowed attackers to view victims&#8217; [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as Opera completed patches for critical vulnerabilities in its browser, researchers discovered another remote code execution bug. In its recent article, &#8220;<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/27/zero_day_opera_bug/" target="_blank">Opera scrambles to quash zero-day bug in freshly-patched browser</a>,&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk" target="_blank">The Register</a> reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>Among the bugs squashed in <a href="http://www.opera.com/download/index.dml?opsys=Windows&amp;lng=en&amp;ver=9.61&amp;platform=Windows&amp;local=y">Opera 9.61</a> was a stored <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_scripting" target="_blank">cross site scripting (XSS)</a> vulnerability that allowed attackers to view victims&#8217; browsing history. That attack is no longer possible, but now researchers have discovered an even more serious exploit that&#8217;s based on the same weakness.</p></blockquote>
<p>Until Opera releases version 9.62, which should be &#8220;very, very soon&#8221; according to Opera spokesman Thomas Ford, your best bet is to disable iFrames and turn off scripting. Open opera:config and select <a href="http://http://www.opera.com/support/usingopera/operaini/#extensions" target="_blank">Extensions</a>|iFrames. Change the setting from &#8220;1&#8243; to &#8220;0.&#8221; Similarly, change Extensions|Scripting from &#8220;1&#8243; to &#8220;0.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bear in mind that the above temporary workaround is going to break a lot of sites that use scripting. It would be simpler if Opera had some way to designate &#8220;trusted sites&#8221; (or a plug-in like <a href="http://noscript.net">NoScript</a>), but I&#8217;m not aware of any way to do this. Hit the comments and let me know if there&#8217;s a better workaround (I haven&#8217;t used Opera since my conversion to <a href="http://mozilla.com" target="_blank">Firefox</a> four years ago).</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/opera-zero-day-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
