 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Corner &#187; Security maxim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/tag/security-maxim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:40:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Security Maxims of a Different Breed</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/security-maxims-of-a-different-breed/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/security-maxims-of-a-different-breed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cyber security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/security-maxims-of-a-different-breed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search for &#8220;computer security maxims&#8221; on any of the top three search engines (Google, Yahoo, Bing) and my articles mostly dominate the results. So I was quite surprised that Security Now Episode #215, entitled &#8220;Security Maxims,&#8221; gave no mention whatsoever of my contributions to this subject over the past three years. Guess I&#8217;ll have to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2009/09/oowl.gif"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-380" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2009/09/oowl.gif" alt="" width="175" height="137" /></a>Search for &#8220;computer security maxims&#8221; on any of the top three search engines (Google, Yahoo, Bing) and my articles mostly dominate the results. So I was quite surprised that <a href="http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-215.htm" target="_blank">Security Now Episode #215</a>, entitled &#8220;Security Maxims,&#8221; gave no mention whatsoever of my contributions to this subject over the past three years. Guess I&#8217;ll have to take that up with Steve and Leo. To be fair about it, though, the maxims that Steve talked about in the episode, composed by Roger G. Johnston, Ph.D., CPP of Argonne National Laboratory, Nuclear Engineering Division, are related to &#8220;&#8230;physical security and nuclear safeguards.&#8221; However, according to Johnston, &#8220;They probably also have considerable                            applicability to cyber security.&#8221; Many of them are also amusing.</p>
<p>Take this one for instance:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>So We’re In Agreement Maxim:</strong> If you’re happy with your security, so  are the bad guys.</p></blockquote>
<p>Or this one:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Schneier’s Maxim #1 (Don’t Wet Your Pants Maxim):</strong> The more excited  people are about a given security technology, the less they understand (1) that  technology and (2) their own security problems.<br />
<span class="graytxt"><strong><em>Comment:</em></strong> From security guru Bruce Schneier.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>How about this?</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Byrne’s Law: </strong>In any electrical circuit,  appliances and wiring will burn out to protect the fuses.</p></blockquote>
<p>In all, there are more than 60 maxims listed. You can <a href="http://www.ne.anl.gov/capabilities/vat/pdfs/security_maxims.pdf">download a PDF of &#8220;Security Maxims&#8221;</a> if you want to see more. I highly recommend you read them. You may learn something new. Like I did.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m out of here. Have to go fire off an email to Steve and Leo&#8230;</p>
<p>Comments? Let me know what you think.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/security-maxims-of-a-different-breed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>14 Golden Rules of Computer Security</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/14-golden-rules-of-computer-security/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/14-golden-rules-of-computer-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secure Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/14-golden-rules-of-computer-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In celebration of (almost) being close to releasing my first eBook to the general public, I’m releasing the list of the 14 Golden Rules of Computer Security in hopes that any last minute errors will be spotted by my peers here at IT Knowledge Exchange. Here’s the list: #1: The best security measures are completely [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In celebration of (almost) being close to releasing my first eBook to the general public, I’m releasing the list of the 14 Golden Rules of Computer Security in hopes that any last minute errors will be spotted by my peers here at IT Knowledge Exchange. Here’s the list:</p>
<p>#1: The best security measures are completely useless if you invite attackers into your PCs or networks.   <br />#2: A first, important step in securing your PC is to install&#160; and configure a NAT router.    <br />#3: Always change the default username and password of any configurable device you put on your home network.    <br />#4: Use an un-guessable, or difficult-to-guess password always.    <br />#5: A vital part of PC security is keeping up with software patches for ALL of the software on your system, not just the operating system. Where it is available, use the software’s automatic updates feature.    <br />#6: Always disable any message preview or auto-open features in your e-mail client. View messages as text-only until you know they are safe.    <br />#7: If you store sensitive information on a PC or laptop, even if it’s only personal information, encrypt the     <br />folders or drives where the information is stored and use an un-guessable passphrase as&#160; the encryption key.    <br />#8: Physical security is&#160; almost as important as data security. Make it as difficult as possible through any     <br />physical means for a thief to steal your hardware. Rules of thumb: Lock it up and lock it down; out of sight, out of mind.    <br />#9: When surfing the web, testing unknown programs, or engaging in other activities with the potential to harm your computer, use a sandbox or virtual machine to protect your base system from harm.    <br />#10: When using external removable media for backups, either encrypt the backup files or make sure the media is taken offline after the backup has been completed.    <br />#11 Never enter sensitive information into any web page unless you have verified that the information is being sent over a secure connection signified by <a href="https:// in">https:// in</a> the address bar and a lock icon in the browser’s status bar.    <br />#12: Once a PC is infected with malware, you can’t trust it. The only way to restore trust is to wipe the hard drive clean and reload the operating system.    <br />#13: When it comes to securing a WiFi network, the only way is WPA.    <br />#14: If your email address will be visible to the public, obfuscate it.</p>
<p>In the book, each one of these rules is explained in detail with links to tools and other information.</p>
<p>I value your comments, so if I’ve left anything out, or you have issues with what I’ve posted here, let me know. I want this to be the best first edition it can be.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/14-golden-rules-of-computer-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Passwords, Again</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/passwords-again/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/passwords-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Password]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secure Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/passwords-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sydney Morning Herald reports, “Hackers break into police computer as sting backfires:” An Australian Federal Police boast, on the ABC&#8217;s Four Corners program, about officers breaking up an underground hacker forum, has backfired after hackers broke into a federal police computer system. Well, if you read the article, you’ll see that they use the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Sydney Morning Herald</em> <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/technology/security/hackers-break-into-police-computer-as-sting-backfires-20090818-eohc.html" target="_blank">reports</a>, “Hackers break into police computer as sting backfires:”</p>
<blockquote><p>An Australian Federal Police boast, on the ABC&#8217;s <i>Four Corners </i>program, about officers breaking up an underground hacker forum, has backfired after hackers broke into a federal police computer system.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, if you read the article, you’ll see that they use the term “broke into” rather loosely. It wasn’t much of a break-in as one of the hackers wrote on a forum post:</p>
<blockquote><p>The hacker wrote &#8216;I couldn&#8217;t stop laughing&#8217; on seeing that the federal police&#8217;s server was running Windows, which is known among hacker communities for being insecure. Police had also &#8216;left the MYSQL password blank&#8217;.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>No password! </strong>Absolutely ridiculous. These are the police, people responsible for security on many levels, and they don’t even put a password on their database? Unbelievable.</p>
<p>People, come on; there’s only one thing worse than having a weak, easily guessable password and that’s having no password at all. I can see why the hacker was in stitches; stupidity is often funny, especially when exhibited by people who should know better.</p>
<p>Let me repeat Golden Rule of Computer Security #1: <strong>The best security measures are completely useless if you invite attackers into your PCs or networks.</strong></p>
<p>No better invitation than an open door, is there?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/passwords-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Spam Has You Irate, Obfuscate!</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/if-spam-has-you-irate-obfuscate/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/if-spam-has-you-irate-obfuscate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/if-spam-has-you-irate-obfuscate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spam email is not only a nuisance, it&#8217;s a security risk. Most of the viruses, worms, and trojans floating around these days are transmitted in one form or another via spam. The threat can be attached directly to the email or it can rely on some subterfuge to get a clueless victim to click on [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam email is not only a nuisance, it&#8217;s a security risk. Most of the viruses, worms, and trojans floating around these days are transmitted in one form or another via spam. The threat can be attached directly to the email or it can rely on some subterfuge to get a clueless victim to click on a link to a malicious website. No matter the method used, the bottom line is that if the spammer doesn&#8217;t have a proper email address, the spam won&#8217;t be delivered.</p>
<p>Spammers get email addresses in various ways, but the primary method is to use a web bot to scrape them from web sites. It&#8217;s not hard to do; the Web is called that because everything is tied together through various links. All the bot has to do is hop around the Web, collecting any email addresses it finds along the way. What the bot is looking for is text strings that take the form of xxx@xxx.xxx. It can easily find those and store them in a database, but it can&#8217;t tell whether or not that string is a valid address. You can use this to your advantage; if you can prevent Internet criminals from getting your email address, you can stop them cold. How do you do this? Obfuscate! (Definition: make obscure or unclear.)</p>
<p>Bots can&#8217;t think; humans can. To you, the string &#8220;kengharthunatyahoodotcom&#8221; means something; most scraper bots would ignore it. Similarly, &#8220;no_spam_kengharthun@yahoo.com&#8221; is easily understood by a human; the bot would recognize it as an email address, but it&#8217;s not a valid one and any message sent to that address would bounce. This technique is a good way to post your email address in forums, social networking profiles, etc., but what about posting your email address on your home page or web site?</p>
<p>There are plenty of free tools on the Web to obfuscate a valid email address. <a href="http://alicorna.com/obfuscator.html" title="Email Obfuscator">This email obfuscator</a> converts my Yahoo! email address to a meaningless (to most bots) string of characters (go try it and you&#8217;ll see what I mean). When properly entered into the html code of a web page, it looks like this: <a href="mailto:kengharthun@yahoo.com">kengharthun@yahoo.com</a>. Anyone clicking on the link will be able to send an email, but your average bot won&#8217;t be able to harvest it. This technique isn&#8217;t foolproof; more sophisticated bots may be able to figure it out. But it&#8217;s going to make it more difficult for them and you&#8217;ll be calmer and more secure as a result.</p>
<p>So, I leave you with Maxim #14 in the <em>How to Secure Your Computer</em> series of articles:</p>
<blockquote><p>If your email address will be visible to the public, obfuscate it using one of the methods or tools above.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Ken is a Systems Engineer at <a href="http://www.connectivecomputing.com">Connective Computing, Inc. </a>specializing in network and desktop security for small and medium businesses. Ken helps others through his <a href="http://askthegeek.kennyhart.com">Ask the Geek</a> blog, is a regular contributor to <a href="http://www.davescomputertips.com">Dave&#8217;s Computer Tips</a> newsletter, and is currently working on his first consumer-oriented book on computer security. </em></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/if-spam-has-you-irate-obfuscate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WiFi Security&#8211;The Only Way is WPA</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/wifi-security-the-only-way-is-wpa/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/wifi-security-the-only-way-is-wpa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Password]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/wifi-security-the-only-way-is-wpa/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please note: since this article was posted, WPA-TKIP has been found to be vulnerable. See my post of 2008.11.13 entitled &#8220;WPA-TKIP Vulnerable to Attack&#8221; for more information. It&#8217;s far too easy to set up WiFi for your home or business; all you have to do is go to your local electronics superstore and pick up [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Please note: since this article was posted, WPA-TKIP has been found to be vulnerable. See my post of 2008.11.13 entitled &#8220;<a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/wpa-now-vulnerable-to-attack/" target="_blank">WPA-TKIP Vulnerable to Attack</a>&#8221; for more information.</strong></em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s far too easy to set up <a href="http://www.webopedia.com/term/w/wi_fi.html" title="WiFi" target="_blank">WiFi</a> for your home or business; all you have to do is go to your local electronics superstore and pick up a <a href="http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C1&amp;childpagename=US%2FLayout&amp;cid=1115416939789&amp;pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisitorWrapper&amp;lid=3978991233B02" target="_blank">wireless router</a>, plug it in to your network, and connect to it. The default configuration of most consumer products&#8211;completely open with no security enabled&#8211;will allow you to connect without having to enter any configuration information into your wireless PC. That&#8217;s why in any given neighborhood you&#8217;ll see multiple unsecured wireless network connections available. Most <a href="http://wi-fiplanet.webopedia.com/TERM/h/hotspot.html" target="_blank">public WiFi hotstpots</a> are also unsecured, open connections. If you just surf the web and send an occasional email, you might be OK (besides the fact that anyone in range can connect to and use your Internet connection), but the moment you start using your PC for banking, making purchases, and paying bills online, that wireless connection absolutely must be secured. It must be done right, and there&#8217;s really only one right way to do it. Before I explain that, let me tell you what <em>not</em> to do:</p>
<p>1. <strong>Don&#8217;t rely on SSID hiding</strong>. I&#8217;ve seen numerous articles that tout <a href="http://www.techweb.com/encyclopedia/defineterm.jhtml?term=ssid" target="_blank">SSID</a> hiding as a <a href="http://netsecurity.about.com/od/quicktip1/qt/qtwifinossid.htm" target="_blank">security measure</a> (and one <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CISSP" target="_blank">CISSP</a>, no less, is recommending it!) While this technique may serve to hide your network from casual view, there&#8217;s nothing secure about it: the SSID is transmitted in clear text in every packet and is easily sniffed by wireless packet sniffers. For example, <a href="http://netsecurity.about.com/od/securitytoolprofiles/p/aaprnetstumbler.htm" target="_blank">Network Stumbler</a> will identify the SSIDs of any network within range, regardless of whether or not the wireless access points are broadcasting.</p>
<p>2. <strong>WEP is broken</strong>. <span>Using 40,000 to 100,000 packets, which can be captured in about a minute, you can crack a WEP key in about three seconds on a Pentium M 1.7 GHz PC. Don&#8217;t believe me? Check it out: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=how+to+crack+wep&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a" target="_blank">This list</a> even provides video tutorials on how to do it. Sure, it provides a small measure of security and it&#8217;s better than nothing, but why use something that&#8217;s already been proven inferior? Would you feel more secure knowing the garage where your store that vintage <a href="http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclecars/chevrolet-corvette/chevrolet-corvette-history-1.shtml" target="_blank">Corvette</a> is protected by a <a href="http://www.masterlock.com/" target="_blank">Master</a> lock or one you bought at an everything-for-a-dollar store? Your personal information is much more valuable than that car. </span></p>
<p>3. <strong>Don&#8217;t bother with MAC address filtering </strong>.  I don&#8217;t know why so many people are <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=mac+address+filtering&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a" target="_blank">recommending this</a>. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAC_address" target="_blank">MAC address</a> filtering is equivalent to SSID hiding&#8211;it&#8217;s virtually useless, except to keep a casual user from inadvertently connecting to your wireless network. Like the SSID, MAC addresses are sent in clear text within the network packets and can easily be discovered and spoofed by anyone sniffing your network.</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s the <em>right</em> way? <a href="http://www.wi-fi.org/knowledge_center/wpa/" target="_blank">WiFi Protected Access</a>, known by its acronym, WPA. There are two versions: WPA-Personal and WPA-Enterprise. WPA-Personal relies on a pre-shared key (PSK), while WPA-Enterprise requires a special authentication server and is therefore more suited to corporate environments. WPA implements 128-bit encryption and as long as you create a strong, <a href="http://www.davescomputertips.com/newsletters/2008/080201.php#3" target="_blank">unguessable passphrase</a>, it&#8217;s completely secure. Configuring WPA-PSK on a given wireless router depends on the brand, but you can find a general tutorial at <a href="http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/3552826" target="_blank">this site</a>.</p>
<p>And that, my dear reader, is Maxim #13 in the <em>How to Secure Your Computer</em> series of articles:</p>
<blockquote><p>When it comes to securing a WiFi network, the only way is WPA.</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/wifi-security-the-only-way-is-wpa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Infected PC? Don&#8217;t Just Clean&#8211;Wipe and Reload</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/infected-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/infected-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rootkit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/infected-pc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ve seen them: PCs with serious malware infections that seem to defy any and all attempts to clean them up. You persevere and eventually get rid of the files that regenerate upon deletion, clean up the autorun registry entries that keep the malware going, and kill all the malicious processes that keep showing up. You&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve seen them: PCs with serious malware infections that seem to defy any and all attempts to clean them up. You persevere and eventually get rid of the files that regenerate upon deletion, clean up the autorun registry entries that keep the malware going, and kill all the malicious processes that keep showing up. You&#8217;re proud of yourself; you&#8217;ve conquered the beast, out-hacked the hackers. You&#8217;re the man: a real, live uber-geek! Pat yourself on the back&#8211;you earned it. Then, after you&#8217;ve finished congratulating yourself, <strong><em>reformat the hard drive and reinstall the operating system</em></strong>&#8211;you can never trust that machine again unless you do.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no such thing as forgiveness in security; once a machine has been compromised, you can never be certain that it&#8217;s free of malware unless you completely wipe it out and start from scratch. Just because everything appears to be working properly after your &#8220;cleanup&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean it is. Modern malware is designed to be tenacious and stealthy. Many malicious programs leave behind remnants of themselves even when good anti-malware software is able to take the venom out of them. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit" target="_blank">Rootkit technology</a> is becoming so sophisticated that normal means of detection don&#8217;t work as <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/03/07/windows_root_kits_a_stealthy/" target="_blank">this article</a> in <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/" target="_blank">The Register</a> explains.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a matter of trust; it&#8217;s also a security maxim. So without further ado, I present How to Secure Your Computer, Maxim #12:</p>
<blockquote><p>Once a PC is infected with malware, you can&#8217;t trust it. The only way to restore trust is to wipe the hard drive clean and reload the operating system.</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/infected-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SSL is Your Friend and Protector on the Web</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/ssl-is-your-friend-and-protector-on-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/ssl-is-your-friend-and-protector-on-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/ssl-is-your-friend-and-protector-on-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope I&#8217;ve given you some valuable advice in this series of posts on how to secure your computer. If so, and if you&#8217;ve chosen to take my advice, you’re probably careful about what you do on the web. You certainly have strong passwords for all of your logins, all of them different, and you [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I&#8217;ve given you some valuable advice in this series of posts on how to secure your computer. If so, and if you&#8217;ve chosen to take my advice, you’re probably careful about what you do on the web. You certainly have strong passwords for all of your logins, all of them different, and you don’t go around telling people what they are or keeping them on sticky notes attached to the monitor at your workplace. But the web can be a dangerous place; make a mistake and you could be in trouble. There&#8217;s one common mistake that if you make it, you may as well paint your passwords in 10-foot tall letters on a lighted billboard next to a busy <span class="hilite">f</span>reeway and invite every hacker to drive by it.</p>
<p>I’m talking about entering your password — or any sensitive in<span class="hilite">f</span>ormation — into any web page that’s not secure. All communication — including your username and password — between your browser and a web server is normally transmitted in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.computerhope.com/jargon/c/cleartex.htm">clear text</a>, easily read by anyone who cares to look. Your data is being sent in clear text if you enter anything onto a page that has the pre<span class="hilite">f</span>ix <em>http:// </em>in its URL. That’s how you know the page <em>isn’t</em> secure. While not a totally reliable method of identifying a phishing site, it&#8217;s a pretty good bet that any financial site or one requesting personal information that displays <em>http:// </em>is suspect; steer clear and don&#8217;t enter your credentials.</p>
<p>How do you know a page <em>is</em> secure? It will use an encrypted connection, signified by the pre<span class="hilite">f</span>ix <em>https://.</em> This page will use a technology known as <a target="_blank" href="http://tldp.org/HOWTO/SSL-Certificates-HOWTO/x64.html">Secure Sockets Layer</a> (SSL). Any in<span class="hilite">f</span>ormation you put into such a page is unreadable by anyone who might intercept it. Only your browser and the web server at the other end can decipher it. Some browsers even show a lock icon to let you know it’s secure. SSL relies on special <a target="_blank" href="http://tldp.org/HOWTO/SSL-Certificates-HOWTO/x64.html">security certi<span class="hilite">f</span>icates</a> issued by a <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_authority">trusted authority</a> who has verified the identity o<span class="hilite">f</span> the website you are logging onto. So, I present you with Maxim #11 in the How to Secure Your Computer series:</p>
<blockquote><p>Never enter sensitive information into any web page unless you have verified that the information is being sent over a secure connection signi<span class="hilite">f</span>ied by <em>https:// </em>in the address bar and a lock icon in the browser’s status bar.</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/ssl-is-your-friend-and-protector-on-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Secure Your Computer: Maxim #10</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/how-to-secure-your-computer-maxim-sharp-10/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/how-to-secure-your-computer-maxim-sharp-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 02:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Password]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/how-to-secure-your-computer-maxim-sharp-10/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend of mine came up to me the other day and said, “I love your computer security maxims, but there&#8217;s one thing I don’t have anything to worry about–I keep all of my passwords stored on an encrypted thumb drive.” &#8220;Well, that’s a good thing,&#8221; I said. &#8220;Where do you keep your backups?” “On [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine came up to me the other day and said, “I love your computer security maxims, but there&#8217;s one thing I don’t have anything to worry about–I keep all of my passwords stored on an encrypted thumb drive.”</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, that’s a good thing,&#8221; I said. &#8220;Where do you keep your backups?”</p>
<p>“On my external USB drive.”</p>
<p>“That’s encrypted, right?”</p>
<p>He blinked and looked away. “No.”</p>
<p>Doh! If a cracker is able to access his PC and that drive is connected and turned on, my friend could be toast. If someone breaks into his house and steals the drive, my friend could be toast. Depending on what is actually stored on the hard drive, full backups can contain lots of personal information&#8211;information that is much more valuable than mere passwords. Think about it: if you have the user&#8217;s name, address, SSN, pet photos, you-name-it, you&#8217;re in Fat City; you can easily assume the identity and recover usernames and passwords.</p>
<p>Few people encrypt their data, much less their backups. They should, but they don’t. Some backup programs allow you to make encrypted backups. If this option is available take advantage of it. The most secure plan would be to both encrypt your data and encrypt the backup for a double layer of protection. Then, take the backup media offline and store it in a secure place. And that is Maxim #10:</p>
<blockquote><p>When using external removable media for backups, either encrypt the backup files or make sure the media is taken offline after the backup has been completed.</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/how-to-secure-your-computer-maxim-sharp-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Ways to Operate Securely on the Web</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/two-ways-to-operate-securely-on-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/two-ways-to-operate-securely-on-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/two-ways-to-operate-securely-on-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve done any coding at all, you probably have a good idea why software developers often run their untested code in a protected environment&#8211;a sandbox. If the software misbehaves, all you have to do is shut down the sandbox and everything returns to normal, no harm done. A sandbox is also a great way [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve done any coding at all, you probably have a good idea why software developers often run their untested code in  a protected environment&#8211;a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_(computer_security)" target="_blank">sandbox</a>. If the software misbehaves, all you have to do is shut down the sandbox and everything returns to normal, no harm done.</p>
<p>A sandbox is also a  great way to prevent <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_virus" title="Virus defined" target="_blank">viruses</a> and  other <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malware" title="Malware defined" target="_blank">malware</a> from infecting your machine while browsing the web. Confine your browser to its own little box and if any malicious software tries to run, it can&#8217;t get to your system, it stays within in the box&#8217;s boundaries. Kill the box and you kill the malware. The top, free sandbox program for Windows&#8211;the one I use for secure surfing and testing&#8211; is <a href="http://www.sandboxie.com/" title="Sandboxie for Windows" target="_blank">Sandboxie</a>. It runs only on  Windows and is Vista-compatible. Run Internet Explorer, Firefox, or any other  program under Sandboxie and you should be safe.</p>
<p><em>Flash Update: Seems <a href="http://www.checkpoint.com/press/2008/zaff051208.html" target="_blank">CheckPoint agrees</a> and has released a product of its own. Check out <a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=153775&amp;f_src=darkreading_sitedefault" target="_blank">this article</a> from Dark Reading.</em></p>
<p>You can also operate securely from inside a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_machine" title="Virtual machine defined" target="_blank">virtual  machine</a>. This is different from a sandbox in that you actually run an entire  operating system, rather than a single program. Many people, this Geek included,  use virtual machines to run alternative operating systems like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux" title="Linux" target="_blank">Linux</a>. In a virtual  machine, you can do everything you do on a real machine and like the sandbox, if  things go wrong, your computer won&#8217;t be harmed. A big advantage of the virtual machine over a sandbox is that you can examine the actual behavior of malware and any damage to the OS. Microsoft provides the free <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/virtualpc/default.mspx" title="Microsoft Virtual PC 2007" target="_blank">Virtual PC</a> and <a href="http://www.vmware.com/" title="VMware" target="_blank">VMware</a> provides its free <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/player/" title="Free VMware Player" target="_blank">VMware Player</a>  and <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/server/" title="Free VMware Server" target="_blank">VMware Server</a>. For the Mac, there&#8217;s <a href="http://www.parallels.com/" title="Parallels Virtual Machine for Mac" target="_blank">Parallels</a> (not free). You might want to check out the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/browserapp.html" title="Secure Browsing Appliance" target="_blank">secure browsing applicance</a> provided for VMware Player.</p>
<p>Security Maxim #9:</p>
<blockquote><p>When surfing the web, testing unknown programs, or engaging in other  activities with the potential to harm your computer, use a sandbox or virtual  machine to protect your base system from harm.</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/two-ways-to-operate-securely-on-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Encryption Have You Complacent About Physical Security?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/does-encryption-have-you-complacent-about-physical-security/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/does-encryption-have-you-complacent-about-physical-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/does-encryption-have-you-complacent-about-physical-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no question that data security is senior to physical security. The real value in a stolen laptop or PC isn&#8217;t in the hardware, it&#8217;s in the data. Sure, some druggie might steal your laptop and sell it for a fix, but the real danger lies in the thief who knows the value of the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no question that data security is senior to physical security. The real value in a stolen laptop or PC isn&#8217;t in the hardware, it&#8217;s in the data. Sure, some druggie might steal your laptop and sell it for a fix, but the real danger lies in the thief who knows the value of the files that are stored on it.  If it&#8217;s a personal laptop, the passwords to your online banking site, credit card numbers, Social Security number&#8211;probably everything about your identity&#8211;may be stored on it. If it&#8217;s a corporate laptop, depending on who you work for, there could be valuable customer information complete with credit card numbers or other proprietary information that a thief or corporate spy could capitalize on.</p>
<p>But physical security is only slightly less important. Don&#8217;t get complacent thinking that you&#8217;re OK just because your data is secure. It&#8217;s an expensive proposition to replace that data, so you must take steps to prevent theft of your hardware.</p>
<p>Encrypting your data is analogous to hiding it. So hide your laptop. Chain down your PC. Make it as difficult as possible for a thief to steal it. I keep my PC in a locked room when I&#8217;m not nearby and I maintain the attitude that someone’s waiting around the next corner to steal my laptop. So, it’s always either in a secure area or with me–and I mean within a couple of feet of me. I rarely leave it in my car and if for some reason I must, I lock it up in the trunk. I never leave it overnight in the office. Out of sight, out of mind.  There are other physical precautions you can take as <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1186" title="Laptop Security, Part One: Preventing Laptop Theft" target="_blank">this Security Focus article</a> outlines.</p>
<p>And let’s not forget about removable and external storage devices; hide them, too. I&#8217;ll cover that in a future article. For now, I leave you with Maxim #8:</p>
<blockquote><p>Physical security is almost as important as data security. Make it as difficult as possible through any physical means for a thief to steal your hardware. Rules of thumb: Lock it up and lock it down; out of sight, out of mind.</p></blockquote>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/does-encryption-have-you-complacent-about-physical-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
