<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Corner &#187; Browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/tag/browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:06:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Chrome is the most secure browser</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/chrome-is-the-most-secure-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/chrome-is-the-most-secure-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 01:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/chrome-is-the-most-secure-browser/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study by Accuvant Labs, commissioned by Google, has concluded that of the top three browsers, Chrome, Internet Explorer and Firefox, Chrome is the most secure. Internet Explorer ranks second and Firefox comes in third. Accuvant took a different approach than previous comparisons that relied on historical vulnerability statistics and URL blacklist services favoring instead [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_653" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 167px"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2010/04/google_chrome.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-653 " style="margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2010/04/google_chrome.jpg" alt="Flickr.com/photos/randyzhang/" width="157" height="180" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Source: Flickr.com/photos/randyzhang/</p></div>
<p>A <a href="http://www.accuvant.com/sites/default/files/AccuvantBrowserSecCompar_FINAL.pdf">study by Accuvant Labs</a>, commissioned by Google, has concluded that of the top three browsers, Chrome, Internet Explorer and Firefox, Chrome is the most secure. Internet Explorer ranks second and Firefox comes in third. Accuvant took a different approach than previous comparisons that relied on historical vulnerability statistics and URL blacklist services favoring instead a more comprehensive look that included sandboxing, plug-in security, JIT hardening, address space layout randomization (ASLR), and data execution prevention (DEP) as well as URL blacklist services. They concluded:</p>
<blockquote><p>The URL blacklisting services offered by all three browsers will stop fewer attacks than will go undetected. Both Google Chrome and Microsoft Internet Explorer implement state-of-the-art anti-exploitation technologies, but Mozilla Firefox lags behind without JIT hardening. While both Google Chrome and Microsoft Internet Explorer implement the same set of anti-exploitation technologies, Google Chrome’s plug-in security and sandboxing architectures are implemented in a more thorough and comprehensive manner. Therefore, we believe Google Chrome is the browser that is most secured against attack.</p></blockquote>
<p>The 140-page report is highly informative, especially if you want to get your security geek on.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/chrome-is-the-most-secure-browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browsers: Who&#8217;s the safest of them all?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/browsers-whos-the-safest-of-them-all/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/browsers-whos-the-safest-of-them-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malicious Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/?p=1299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How safe is your web browser? For a long time now, I and many other techies have been advocating a switch to to Firefox (or any of the other popular browsers) for anyone who is using Internet Explorer. The reason? Other browsers are more secure. We all know that&#8217;s not really true anymore, it&#8217;s just [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2010/06/question-mark.gif"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-777" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2010/06/question-mark.gif" alt="" width="185" height="200" /></a>How safe is your web browser? For a long time now, I and many other techies have been advocating a switch to to Firefox (or any of the other popular browsers) for anyone who is using Internet Explorer. The reason? Other browsers are more secure. We all know that&#8217;s not really true anymore, it&#8217;s just that the other browsers are attacked less frequently than IE. Internet Explorer is and always has been the low-hanging fruit for hackers.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">For some time now, modern browsers have been coded to detect and block malicious websites. We have all seen the messages like the one shown below:</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2011/08/attackblock.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1298" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2011/08/attackblock.png" alt="" width="515" height="241" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<p>Have you ever wondered how well your browser stacks up with respect to blocking malware? The answer might surprise you. Msnbc.com&#8217;s <em>Technolog</em> reports that IE9 is the clear winner:</p>
<blockquote><p>Tests by <a href="http://www.nsslabs.com/company/news/press-releases/nss-labs-performs-international-tests-of-web-browsers-against-sem.html" target="_blank">NSS Labs</a> to &#8220;examine the ability of five different web browsers to protect users  from socially-engineered malware&#8221; showed that IE9 was able to block  this kind of threat 99 percent of the time, beating out Apple Safari 5,  Google Chrome 12, Mozilla Firefox 4 and Opera 11.</p>
<p>(Msnbc.com is a joint venture of Microsoft and NBC Universal.)</p>
<p>The  closest another Web browser got to that blocking-the-bad stuff rate was  Chrome, at a very distant 13.2 percent. At the low end of the blockers  was Opera, with a 6.1 percent rate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Makes you think twice, doesn&#8217;t it? Those tests are meaningful, of course, but they don&#8217;t take into account that IE9&#8242;s market share is only 6.8 percent whereas IE8 controls the market with 29.23 percent, so the overall effect at this time is not significant. However, perhaps this will spur the others on to increasing the effectiveness of their own technologies.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/browsers-whos-the-safest-of-them-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secure Computing: Harden Your Browser</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/secure-computing-harden-your-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/secure-computing-harden-your-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[14 Golden Rules of Computer Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secure Computing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/secure-computing-harden-your-browser/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ActiveX &#8211; probably the worst idea Microsoft ever came up with &#8211; isn&#8217;t the only problem with browsers even though its vulnerabilities are probably the most frequently exploited. If you&#8217;ve been reading this blog for any length of time, you know where I stand on that issue. That&#8217;s not to say that any of the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2010/05/ie7_internet_zone_high.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-681" style="margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2010/05/ie7_internet_zone_high.png" alt="" width="248" height="311" /></a>ActiveX &#8211; probably the worst idea Microsoft ever came up with &#8211; isn&#8217;t the only problem with browsers even though its vulnerabilities are probably the most frequently exploited. If you&#8217;ve been reading this blog for any length of time, you know where I stand on that issue. That&#8217;s not to say that any of the alternatives are inherently more secure; they&#8217;re not. Every modern browser supports JavaScript and there are plenty of exploits that rely on it. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s essential that no matter what browser you use, you make every effort you can to harden it against attack.</p>
<p>Why is this necessary? Unfortunately, most of the time the browser that comes pre-installed on new computers, the one that the computer owners will use, is not set up in a secure default configuration. This is one of the worst ideas ever when it comes to security. If I had my way, I&#8217;d set the default configuration such that warnings would be issued for any website that wasn&#8217;t built with simple, benign HTML. I realize this isn&#8217;t practical on today&#8217;s interactive Internet and it would break nearly everything out there today (except a site like <a href="http://kenharthun.com/psychosis" target="_blank">this one</a>, composed only of an image and some text with a hypertext link).</p>
<p>Fortunately, there are plenty of free resources (including this blog and my free eBook, &#8220;<a href="http://askthegeek.kennyhart.com/index.php/14-golden-rules-free-download/" target="_blank">14 Golden Rules of Computer Security</a>&#8220;) that have good information on what to do. The best one, bar none, is CERT&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/securing_browser/" target="_blank">Securing Your Web Browser</a>.&#8221; All of the details anyone needs to secure the major browsers &#8211; Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, and Apple Safari to name the top three &#8211; are all there with general tips on what to do with virtually any of the others you may encounter.</p>
<p>Tell everyone you know about it. Make it part of the setup routine when you deploy PCs or set them up for your family. The Internet will be a safer place if you do.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/secure-computing-harden-your-browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Chromium OS Security</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/video-chromium-os-security/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/video-chromium-os-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 02:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chromium OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/?p=578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Chrome OS is an open source operating system for people who spend most of their time on the web built around the core tenets of speed, simplicity and security. http://www.chromium.org. Now this is the way it should be done. [kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/A9WVmNfgjtQ" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome OS is an open source operating system for people who spend most of their time on the web built around the core tenets of speed, simplicity and security. http://www.chromium.org.</p>
<p>Now this is the way it should be done.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/A9WVmNfgjtQ" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/video-chromium-os-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla Disables Insecure Microsoft Firefox Add-on</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/mozilla-disables-insecure-microsoft-firefox-add-on/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/mozilla-disables-insecure-microsoft-firefox-add-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insecure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Code Execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/mozilla-disables-insecure-microsoft-firefox-add-on/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I fired up my laptop the other day, I was greeted with this pop-up box: If you&#8217;re running Firefox, you may have already seen it yourself. Recall that these add-ons were installed into Firefox without the user&#8217;s permission, causing quite an uproar in the Mozilla user community. Brian Krebs of The Washington Post wrote: [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I fired up my laptop the other day, I was greeted with this pop-up box:</p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2009/10/wpf1-thumb-425x307.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-401" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2009/10/wpf1-thumb-425x307.jpg" alt="" width="425" height="307" /></a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re running Firefox, you may have already seen it yourself. Recall that these add-ons were installed into Firefox without the user&#8217;s permission, causing quite an uproar in the Mozilla user community. Brian Krebs of <em>The Washington Post </em>wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>In May, I wrote about <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/05/microsoft_update_quietly_insta.html">a Windows patch for the Microsoft .NET package</a> that silently installed the <strong>Microsoft .NET Framework Assistant</strong> add-on into Firefox. The package also included an associated plug-in for Firefox called the <strong>Windows Presentation Foundation</strong> plug-in. The Mozilla user community was up arms over not just the fact that Microsoft was introducing unwanted components that could potentially weaken the security of Firefox, but that Redmond had made the thing almost impossible to remove.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Mike Shaver</strong>, Mozilla&#8217;s vice president of engineering, <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2009/10/16/net-framework-assistant-blocked-to-disarm-security-vulnerability/">wrote</a> Friday on the Mozilla Security Blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>Because of the difficulties some users have had entirely removing the add-on, and because of the severity of the risk it represents if not disabled, we contacted Microsoft today to indicate that we were looking to disable the extension and plugin for all users via our blocklisting mechanism. Microsoft agreed with the plan, and we put the blocklist entry live immediately.</p></blockquote>
<p>At least Microsoft agreed with Mozilla&#8217;s action to block the insecure add-on, but shame on them for blatantly compromising the security of a browser they don&#8217;t even own.</p>
<p>Conspiracy theorists: Do you have an opinion on this?</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/mozilla-disables-insecure-microsoft-firefox-add-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Safe Browsing Diagnostic Page</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/google-safe-browsing-diagnostic-page/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/google-safe-browsing-diagnostic-page/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/google-safe-browsing-diagnostic-page/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Google, there’s a tool you can use to check any site and see if Google lists it as hosting any suspicious files or acting as a malware intermediary. Yes, I know there’s a Firefox extension and that the Google Toolbar for Firefox incorporates the tool, but what if you’re out in the field [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Google, there’s a tool you can use to check any site and see if Google lists it as hosting any suspicious files or acting as a malware intermediary. Yes, I know there’s a Firefox extension and that the Google Toolbar for Firefox incorporates the tool, but what if you’re out in the field on a machine that doesn’t have the tool installed and you want to check a site? Simple. Use this URL:</p>
<p>&#8220;http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=[URL of site you want to check]&#8221; (Leave off the http://).</p>
<p style="text-align: left">For example, this URL produced the report shown in the screen shot (click on the image to view it full size): <a title="http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com" href="http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><a title="http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com" href="http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com">http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2009/09/googlesafeitke.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-363 aligncenter" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/36/files/2009/09/googlesafeitke.png" alt="" width="406" height="323" /></a></p>
<p>Try it out for yourself on your favorite sites. You might be surprised at what you find out.</p>
<p>(Thanks to Steve Gibson and Leo Laporte of <a href="http://grc.com/securitynow" target="_blank">Security Now!</a> for presenting a reader comment that brought this to my attention.)</p>
<p>What do you think? <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/#comments">Leave a comment!</a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/google-safe-browsing-diagnostic-page/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good PC Security Begins With a Baseline</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/good-pc-security-begins-with-a-baseline/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/good-pc-security-begins-with-a-baseline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patch management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/good-pc-security-begins-with-a-baseline/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received some good feedback on my “14 Golden Rules of Computer Security” list, in particular, this comment from Michael: “…you encourage people to go through all the effort of running Virtual Machines to protect themselves from malware, but you don’t actually encourage them to run Anti-Virus software. Which basically, unfortunately, means you’re violating rule [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received some good feedback on my “<a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/14-golden-rules-of-computer-security/" target="_blank">14 Golden Rules of Computer Security</a>” list, in particular, this comment from Michael: “…you encourage people to go through all the effort of running Virtual Machines to protect themselves from malware, but you don’t actually encourage them to run Anti-Virus software. Which basically, unfortunately, means you’re violating rule #1 and much more likely to run into rule #12.” This lead to a review of past articles I’ve posted on the subject and my finding that though I’ve covered all of the bases, my writing is a bit fragmented. So, you can go back to “<a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/nine-steps-to-system-security-2008/">Nine Steps to System Security – 2008&quot;</a>, “<a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/the-lazy-mans-way-to-system-security/">The Lazy Man’s Way to System Security”</a>, and “<a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/14-golden-rules-of-computer-security/" target="_blank">14 Golden Rules of Computer Security</a>” and put them all together for a complete PC security package, but that’s a lot for the average user to digest.</p>
<p>As of today, I’m embarking on a major pre-release revision of the eBook, <em>14 Golden Rules of Computer Security</em> to make sure all of the bases are covered in a logical combination and sequence. In essence, the book will begin with the concept of a security baseline—the bare security essentials—for a normal home PC setup and will branch from there.</p>
<p>What’s a good PC security baseline? In “The Lazy Man’s Way to System Security,” I proposed these four bare security essentials: “…a NAT router; a good antivirus program; a good anti-malware program; and, a good software firewall.” That was good enough at the time, but these days antivirus, antimalware and a software firewall are usually combined into a single suite. I choose to align with <em><a href="http://windowssecrets.com" target="_blank">Windows Secrets’</a></em>&#160; <a href="http://WindowsSecrets.com/links/qivu6yl5kstcd/f82493h/?url=windowssecrets.com%2Freviews%2Fsecurity-baseline%2F">Security Baseline page</a>: “…a hardware firewall that&#8217;s built into your [NAT] router, security software that guards against all types of malware threats, a software-update service to ensure that your applications are patched against the latest exploits, and a secure browser.”</p>
<p>There are many possibilities for implementing those four basic items and that will be well covered in the book.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/good-pc-security-begins-with-a-baseline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Use LastPass</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/i-use-lastpass/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/i-use-lastpass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Password]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/i-use-lastpass/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OMG! I just opened that box that Pandora gave me. I have often said that I don’t like password managers because I don’t consider them secure. That goes double for the password managers built into the browsers. I don’t like anything to reside directly on my system, so that leaves a remote location. These days, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! I just opened that box that Pandora gave me. I have often said that I don’t like password managers because I don’t consider them secure. That goes double for the password managers built into the browsers. I don’t like anything to reside directly on my system, so that leaves a remote location. These days, “remote location” equates to “The Cloud.”</p>
<p>That’s why I use <a href="http://lastpass.com" target="_blank">LastPass</a> and have been using it for more than a year now. All of my passwords are stored online, encrypted, and I only have to remember one master password to unlock the vault. I don’t have to carry anything with me on a thumb drive or install any programs on someone else’s computer in order to access my stuff when I’m not using my own PC.</p>
<p>Don’t take my word for it, check out this <a href="https://lastpass.com/features.php" target="_blank">list of features</a>. And then decide for yourself.</p>
<p>Oh, by the way, you can generate very secure passwords with LastPass and you don’t have to worry about remembering them, because LastPass will do it for you. Firefox and IE add-ons make things even easier. When you come to a new site you need to set up an account with, LastPass offers to generate a password for you. Then, when you log in, LastPass offers to save all information for the site. If you do that and then come back to the site later, LastPass will give you the option to either auto-fill the information or perform an auto login.</p>
<p>Highly recommended if you don’t want to do your own password management. You can still use all of the methods I’ve proposed for generating secure passwords, but you’ll never have to worry about remembering them.&#160; Use my methods to generate the most secure password you can for your LastPass master password and encode it so you can write it down securely, but use LastPass for all your password management needs.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/i-use-lastpass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search for Screensavers at Your Own Risk</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/search-for-screensavers-at-your-own-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/search-for-screensavers-at-your-own-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secure Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/search-for-screensavers-at-your-own-risk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enter “screensavers” into any major search engine and there’s better than a fifty percent chance that any result you click on will land you on a malicious website. According to McAfee’s recently released report “The Web’s Most Dangerous Search Terms,“ that search term carries a maximum risk of 59.1 percent. Furthermore, lyrics and anything that [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enter “screensavers” into any major search engine and there’s better than a fifty percent chance that any result you click on will land you on a malicious website. According to McAfee’s recently released report “<a href="http://us.mcafee.com/en-us/local/docs/most_dangerous_searchterm_us.pdf">The Web’s Most Dangerous Search Terms</a>,“ that search term carries a maximum risk of 59.1 percent. Furthermore, lyrics and anything that includes the word “free” have a high risk of exposing users to malicious or fraudulent web sites. Health-related search terms have the lowest risk profile. Check out <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3457">The Web&#8217;s most dangerous keywords to search for</a> on ZDNet.com.</p>
<p>One of the biggest problems is that the bad guys, using Black Hat SEO techniques, grab onto the trending search terms of the moment and use their popularity to get links to compromised sites placed high in the search engine rankings. This, coupled with the fact that <a href="http://www.websense.com/securitylabs/docs/WSL_Report_1H08_FINAL.pdf">77% of Websites carrying malicious code are legitimate sites</a>, make for an increasingly dangerous environment for the casual surfer.</p>
<p>This is yet another reason to continue to beat my drum: If you use IE, disable scripting and ActiveX (IE8 has increased security, so consider upgrading). Better yet, switch to Firefox and use the NoScript plugin. Tell the users who trust you to do the same, will you? And make sure they have the latest security patches on their systems. Most people are trusting souls; on the web, they shouldn’t be. Let’s instill the “trust no one” (except for us white hats, of course) mentality into everyone we can.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/search-for-screensavers-at-your-own-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NoScript Blocks Latest Firefox Bug</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/noscript-blocks-latest-firefox-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/noscript-blocks-latest-firefox-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NoScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secure Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/noscript-blocks-latest-firefox-bug/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got NoScript? If not, get it&#8211;the latest Firefox bug, an XML tag remote memory corruption vulnerability released on Wednesday, is mitigated by having the NoScript addon installed. The bug can be exploited by a malicious website and can cause the browser to execute malware with no user intervention. All 3.0.x versions of Firefox running on [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got <a href="http://noscript.net" target="_blank">NoScript</a>? If not, get it&#8211;the latest Firefox bug, a<span class="title">n XML tag remote memory corruption vulnerability</span> released on Wednesday, is mitigated by having the NoScript addon installed.</p>
<p>The bug can be exploited by a malicious website and can cause the browser to execute malware with no user intervention. All 3.0.x versions of Firefox running on Windows, Mac, and Linux operatintg systems are vulnerable. According to the Mozilla Wiki, the patched version, Firefox 3.0.8, &#8220;&#8230;is a high-priority firedrill security update to Firefox 3.0.x&#8221; and will be rolled out April 1.</p>
<p>The 3.0.8 release also fixes the Pwn2Own bug discovered at CanSecWest 2009, an issue that NoScript also mitigates.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said it before (see &#8220;<a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/software-for-secure-computing-firefox-noscript/">Software for Secure Computing: Firefox &amp; NoScript</a>&#8220;); now&#8217;s a good time to say it again: install NoScript, and enjoy secure computing.</p>
<p>SecurityFocus bulletin: <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34235/info" target="_blank">http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34235/info</a>.<br />
<em>The Register</em> article: <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/26/new_firefox_exploit/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/26/new_firefox_exploit/</a>.<br />
Mozilla Security Blog post: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/mozillasecurityblog">http://tinyurl.com/mozillasecurityblog</a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/noscript-blocks-latest-firefox-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
