As if we don’t already have enough to deal with, it seems that malvertising–a technique where malicious code is placed in an online ad to either mislead the user or infect their computer—is on the rise. Microsoft recently filed five lawsuits against unnamed individuals accusing them of posting ads containing malicious and deceptive code on its MSN advertising network. And when Microsoft stands up and takes notice against a threat, you know it has some teeth.
The lawsuits Microsoft filed allege that individuals doing business as Soft Solutions, Direct Ad, “qiweroqw.com” (that’s a randomly generated name if there ever was one), ITmeter INC, and “ote2008.info” used malverstisements to either spread malicious code or deceive users into visiting websites that peddle scareware. Microsoft hopes that by filing civil suits in the U.S., the individuals responsible will be discovered and enjoined from continuing to post malvertising.
Recall that last week, as reported in The Register, an ad appeared on the New York Times web site offering a virus scan that then attempted to sell scareware to the user (“NYT scareware scam linked to click fraud botnet”).
As always, I recommend using a secure browser (Firefox with NoScript) and keeping your OS and security software up to date. Oh, yes, and a healthy serving of general caution couldn’t hurt.
Caveat araneo-fluitator! (Let the web-surfer beware!)
What do you think? Leave a comment!
My most recent post, Hacker Skills Help Save a Client’s PC, is a real-life practical example of how honing (or developing) your hacking skills can help you better serve your clients. So if you haven’t gotten around to it yet, mosey on over to HackThisSite.org, create an account and get started on the basic missions. They’re pretty simple, but if you don’t know a thing about hacking, you’ll be challenged.
Did you figure out level 3 of the HackThisSite.org Basic Missions? Here’s the mission:
This time Network Security Sam remembered to upload the password file, but there were deeper problems than that.
Recall that Sam forgot the password file the last time and so the script that checked for the file returned a <null> value—a blank password. This time, he remembered to upload the password file, which, if you look at the source code for the page, is password.php. In the last challenge, we were told that the password file was not encrypted. I wonder if we can open password.php? Let’s copy the URL of the challenge page and append “password.php” to it: http://www.hackthissite.org/missions/basic/3/password.php. Voila! The page opens, revealing 792debbc as the password.
A client recently called about his home PC saying that there were all kinds of pop-ups telling him he was infected. Naturally, the pop-ups promised to remove the “infection” for $49.95, a typical scareware tactic. I figured this would be a simple job, probably WinAntivirus Pro or some variant of it, and I would be in and out in less than an hour. I was wrong; he had deeper problems.
When I booted his PC, I was confronted by multiple command windows all with the title “desote.exe.” I was able to get to a web page and determine that this file is related to Windows Police PRO, a WinAntivirus Pro variant. I was also able to download MalwareBytes’ Antimalware. It wouldn’t install; desote.exe popped in every time I tried to run MBAM installer. I decided to try a manual removal to get the PC to where I could run MBAM and clean things up later, so I deleted desote.exe, dbsinit.exe and a couple other related files. That was a mistake; Windows lost its ability to run .exe files.
I knew I’d probably have to hack it, so I fell back on an old trick: When .exe files won’t run, change the extension to .com. This worked. I was able to install MBAM, run it, and get the system cleaned up. Turns out that the malware changes the registry key HKCR\exefile\shell\open\command from the (Default) entry of [“%1″ %*] to ; since desote.exe was missing, Windows didn’t know what shell to run .exe files with. Besides that, MBAM found rootkit components that would have been difficult to remove manually.
Hacker skills are valuable for us white hats.
Did you figure out level 2 of the HackThisSite.org Basic Missions? Here’s the mission:
Network Security Sam set up a password protection script. He made it load the real password from an unencrypted text file and compare it to the password the user enters. However, he neglected to upload the password file…
Read the mission briefing very carefully. A script loads a password from a file. There isn’t a file, so the script won’t load anything, meaning the variable will be…empty (blank). Clicking the Submit button with an empty password field should do it.
That worked. Mission accomplished.
Yesterday, Michael Morisy, ITKnowledgeExchange’s community editor, posted “President Obama’s back-to-school speech tells students to pursue technology. What’s your advice?” It contained a transcript of The President’s speech. Ignoring the controversy and the politics, one has to agree that he made some good points; in fact, I found the whole speech inspiring.
One thing President Obama said relative to the pursuit of technology careers stood out: “Students who sat where you sit 20 years ago founded Google, Twitter and Facebook and changed the way we communicate with each other.” Yes, and before that another generation of students invented the Internet and founded the biggest software company in the world. What he left unsaid is that these technological advances have not been without problems; indeed, they have created entirely new problems that have spawned a separate IT industry: Information Security.
My advice to students who pursue technological careers—particularly IT related—is to realize that the development of new technology also carries with it the responsibility of ensuring that technology is safe to use. The lack of such responsibility in the past, whether through shortsightedness or outright neglect, has given us an Internet that is a haven for a new breed of criminal, that exposes our children to predators, hate propaganda and smut all at the click of a button and often unwittingly. And I haven’t even mentioned the threat to our national security.
President Obama said, “…you become good at things through hard work.” There’s a lot of hard work ahead before we get to the point where anyone can buy a computer, plug it in and use it safely without having to be an information security specialist.
We’ll know we’re there when the PC is as safe to use as a TV.
All of them are critical, but not a single one of them affects Windows 7, scheduled for release on October 22.
The most dangerous flaw covered by this month’s batch of patches is a remote code execution vulnerability in the way that the JScript scripting engine decodes script in Web pages (MS09-045). A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by convincing a user to visit a specially crafted Web page and this could result in execution of arbitrary code on the affected system. All versions of Windows—except Windows 7—are vulnerable. Here is the list of bulletins taken from the Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for September 2009:
MS09-045 Vulnerability in JScript Scripting Engine Could Allow Remote Code Execution (971961)
MS09-049 Vulnerability in Wireless LAN AutoConfig Service Could Allow Remote Code Execution (970710)
MS09-047 Vulnerabilities in Windows Media Format Could Allow Remote Code Execution (973812)
MS09-048 Vulnerabilities in Windows TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (967723)
MS09-046 Vulnerability in DHTML Editing Component ActiveX Control Could Allow Remote Code Execution (956844)
It remains to be seen how Windows 7 will fare once it’s released to retail, but so far, it appears to be more secure the previous versions of Windows. According to Wolfgang Kandek, chief technology officer at software security provider Qualys, "There are a number of additional security measures [in Windows 7] that seem to be working so far in its favor."
We can only hope.
The other day, I proposed you test out your ethical hacking skills over at HackThisSite. If you didn’t see that post, take a look now: How Are Your Hacking Skills? As promised, I’m publishing my comments and approach to the solution.
Level 1, dubbed “The Idiot Test,” requires that you enter the correct password into a password field in order to continue to the next level. The name itself seemed a giveaway to me, so I started with the obvious, a blank password, and simply clicked the submit button. No joy. Next, I tried ten of the most popular weak passwords in use (take your pick as to which “Top Ten” list you prefer):
None of these worked; it appeared as if the test was going beyond the idiot level. If it’s that simple, it should be obvious, so I took another look at the screen and noticed another subtle clue: “If you have no idea what to do, you must learn HTML.” Hmm. Maybe the page source has a clue. I opened the page source and searched for “password.” Bingo! I found this in the code:
<!-- the first few levels are extremely easy: password is 1e79cde6 –>
Did you figure it out? Hit the comments and let me know.
I received some good feedback on my “14 Golden Rules of Computer Security” list, in particular, this comment from Michael: “…you encourage people to go through all the effort of running Virtual Machines to protect themselves from malware, but you don’t actually encourage them to run Anti-Virus software. Which basically, unfortunately, means you’re violating rule #1 and much more likely to run into rule #12.” This lead to a review of past articles I’ve posted on the subject and my finding that though I’ve covered all of the bases, my writing is a bit fragmented. So, you can go back to “Nine Steps to System Security – 2008", “The Lazy Man’s Way to System Security”, and “14 Golden Rules of Computer Security” and put them all together for a complete PC security package, but that’s a lot for the average user to digest.
As of today, I’m embarking on a major pre-release revision of the eBook, 14 Golden Rules of Computer Security to make sure all of the bases are covered in a logical combination and sequence. In essence, the book will begin with the concept of a security baseline—the bare security essentials—for a normal home PC setup and will branch from there.
What’s a good PC security baseline? In “The Lazy Man’s Way to System Security,” I proposed these four bare security essentials: “…a NAT router; a good antivirus program; a good anti-malware program; and, a good software firewall.” That was good enough at the time, but these days antivirus, antimalware and a software firewall are usually combined into a single suite. I choose to align with Windows Secrets’ Security Baseline page: “…a hardware firewall that’s built into your [NAT] router, security software that guards against all types of malware threats, a software-update service to ensure that your applications are patched against the latest exploits, and a secure browser.”
There are many possibilities for implementing those four basic items and that will be well covered in the book.
In playing the contract consultant game over the years, I’ve become accustomed to verbal and written skills assessment tests, but until recently, I’d never had anyone present a question like this: “Optional – Extra Credit – Create an account on http://www.hackthissite.org and complete levels 1 through 4 of the Basic Web Hacking Challenge and explain how you figured out each level.” Sounds like fun, I thought, and it makes sense: If you want to know how well a guy can protect your network, see if he knows how a hacker would attack it. So I headed on over to the site. Having never been there, I didn’t know what to expect; I was greeted with this:
Hack This Site is a free, safe and legal training ground for hackers to test and expand their hacking skills. More than just another hacker war games site, we are a living, breathing community with many active projects in development, with a vast selection of hacking articles and a huge forum where users can discuss hacking, network security, and just about everything. Tune in to the hacker underground and get involved with the project.
I created an account, logged in and proceeded to the “Basic Missions” section; their are 11 of them, and I was to complete the first four. At level one, the challenge reads, “This level is what we call ‘The Idiot Test.’ If you can’t complete it, don’t give up on learning all you can, but don’t go begging to someone else for the answer, that’s one way to get you hated/made fun of. Enter the password and you can continue.”
Though they call it “The Idiot Test,” it’s not as simple as you might think. You’ll find the solution interesting. Try it for yourself, post your comments and check back in a day or so; I’ll be posting my analysis and solutions to each level, eventually covering all 11 basic missions.
In the meantime, have a safe and enjoyable Labor Day weekend.
It’s just not in fashion anymore; phishing attacks are ‘way down, falling out of favor with cybercriminals who now prefer malicious websites and password-stealing Trojan horse programs.
IBM’s security research and development division, X-Force, recently issued a report that found throughout 2008 , phishing volume was around 0.5 percent of overall spam volume. But in the first half of 2009, the volume of phishing attacks fell to around 0.1 percent of spam volume. Not only did the volume of phishing attacks drop, but the targets also changed: in 2008, 90 percent of all phishing attacks targeted the financial industry; in the first half of 2009, that percentage had dropped to 66 percent.
That’s the good news. The bad news is that, according to the report, the number of malicious Web links is up 508 percent in the first half of 2009 and many of these links appear on otherwise trusted sites such as search engines. X-Force Director Kris Lamb says, “There is no such thing as safe browsing today and it is no longer the case that only the red light district sites are responsible for malware. We’ve reached a tipping point where every Web site should be viewed as suspicious and every user is at risk."
A copy of the IBM report can be downloaded here (PDF).
As always, let the surfer beware.