After a good run of more than 5 years, I am shutting down my Ask the Geek the website. I received a fair offer for the domain it rests on, kennyhart.com and have decided to accept it (yes, you read that right–it wasn’t an attempt to scam me). I don’t know exactly when it will be shut down or how it will emerge (if at all) in its new incarnation.
Many times, I have referenced the site here, so if the links are broken, let me know. The new owner intends to set the site up again somewhere and I may be able to redirect the links.
I am NOT giving up on “14 Golden Rules of Computer Security” and will soon also be releasing “101 Internet Security Tips.” The Geek Toolkit is also alive and well and it has been fully updated. If you purchased a copy of it, you already have access to the update and were informed by email.
I am doing this because I have committed to helping expand Dave’s Computer Tips and I think that my time and energy will be better spent working with Dave on this site than it was working on my own. My contract with TechTarget and Security Corner blog will not be affected by this.
As you know, I’m an editor over at Dave’s Computer Tips and have been working with that site for going on four years. We have a forum, of course and this is a relevant thread, more than appropriate for Security Corner:
ozbloke wrote:Does Adobe Flash Player have the worst security record of all time??
Yes, even worse than Microsoft, if that’s even possible…Has Adobe ever released a version of Flash Player that wasn’t riddled with vulnerabilities??
Not that I know of. I dumped all things Adobe a long time ago. Unfortunately, I can’t function without using the Flash player.Adobe has just discovered a “critical vulnerability” in its Flash Player that has the potential to cause all kinds of trouble; the flaw could cause a user’s computer or mobile device to crash and, even more concerning, the vulnerability could “potentially allow an attacker to take control of the affected system.”
Not even remotely surprised.The flaw affects Adobe Flash Player 10.2.152.33 and earlier versions of the platform running on every major operating system, including Windows, Macintosh, Linux, and Solaris. It’s also an issue on Android devices running Flash 10.1 and earlier. To date, Adobe has discovered that the vulnerability is being exploited in Flash files, as well as through Microsoft Excel but the issue hasn’t affected Reader or Acrobat.
Don’t get me started about Reader and Acrobat. Two of the crappiest programs ever made, if you ask me.According to reports; Adobe plans to release a fix for the vulnerability sometime next week. Until then, the company has warned users to “follow security best practices by keeping their anti-malware software and definitions up to date.”………no sh*t Sherlock!!
Ya think?Roll on HTML5!!!
It’s really unacceptable and unfortunate that Adobe has managed to get itself into a position of being the “standard” for Flash. We need a change, don’t we?
Got this email a couple of days ago. I was going to delete it, but somehow it looked legitimate:
I'm interested in purchasing kennyhart.com. I'd likely be able to pay in the $200 - $700 range for it. Let me know whether or not you are open to hearing a formal offer.
Now, that seemed right in the range of what I know the domain is probably worth, so I answered the email:
Sure. I was thinking about flipping it and my website. Let me know what you have in mind.
To which I received this reply back:
Thanks for getting back to me. I can offer you $xxx for KennyHart.com and all associated content. Let me know if you are interested and we can get the ball rolling on the transfer.
I wrote back and told him I was up for it. The offer was a fair one and I was ready to accept it. He wrote back with this:
Great. The easiest way to send the payment will be paypal. Do you have a paypal account?
Something felt a little odd that this was going so quickly and way too easy, but since I have PayPal locked down with 2-factor authentication, I wasn’t too worried about getting hacked. Still, I had to ask a simple question, so I replied with this:
I have PayPal. The PayPal email address is firstname.lastname@example.org. Please clarify what you mean by "all associated content." I assume you mean the content at Ask the Geek and Singing Songwriter web sites. The writer website has no content at this time and copyright for my original music is not subject to transfer, as I do not own 100% of the songs.
No reply. No payment. Nothing. It just stopped dead. As it stands right now, I believe it’s possible that I was targeted with a manual phishing attempt. It’s either that, or he decided my terms were a deal killer. Like I said, it appeared to be legitimate. He does have a website posted that solicits people to sell him their sites.
What could someone do with my PayPal email address? Attempt a brute force attack on my password, that’s what. Though that would never work because of the 2-factor requirement.
I’ll probably never know.
1. Is your car parked, empty, in the driveway right now with its engine on?
2. Is your shower, with no one in it, running?
3. Is your stove, with nothing cooking on it, turned on?
4. Is your attic light on 24/7?
I’m fairly sure that you answered “no” to all of these questions. It just doesn’t make sense to leave something on if you’re not using it. All this does is run up your electric bill for nothing, right?
Then why would you want to leave your PC on 24/7? If your PC has been compromised and is a member of one of the major spam zombie botnets, chances are that you’re spewing spam in a constant stream.
Do us all a favor and use your index finger to switch it off when you’re not using it. If you do nothing else to clean it up, just shutting down the PC if it’s not being used would cut spam volume significantly.
Do you agree or disagree? Hit the comments and put in your two cents.
I just acquired Private Label Rights to an interesting series of media presentations called 101 Internet Security Tips. Because I am constantly faced with the necessity to educate people on security, I thought this would be a good starting point for a useful reference. [Private Label Rights, called “PLR” in Internet marketing circles, is a license granted by the original creator of the material that essentially gives the purchaser the right to do what he will with the material within the license terms. -Ed.]
After I read the entire report, I realized that I would have to bring it up to present time and expand upon the material given to include links to further reference materials and relevant products and utilities. This is typical for most PLR products–you have a framework of ideas, but it’s up to you as editor to develop them into a comprehensive and coherent end product. Moreover, one who is particularly well versed in the subject material will often find misconceptions and errors introduced by the original creator. Nevertheless, 101 Internet Security Tips is good information, even in its raw form.
So, let me present the raw introduction for your comment. Remember this because I plan to post excerpts, including the revised and updated version, in future posts.
Using the Internet for business and leisure is a necessity in today’s world. As the technology that allows you to work more efﬁciently on-line increases, techniques used by Internet criminals also adapts. While some on-line crimes are perpetrated only for the criminal to exert power by making your life miserable through damaging your computer, identity theft is a main focus for most Internet thieves. In addition to identity theft threats from hackers, computers can fall victim to viruses, spyware and phishing programs from Internet misuse. While you may think that high-proﬁle or wealthy individuals are the common targets, most hackers are looking for any easy opportunity. The easiest opportunity, of course, is an unprotected computer. Your computer holds all of your most private personal and ﬁnancial information, so proper security is a must to keep you and your ﬁles safe.
Unless you absolutely need Java, get rid of it. At the very least, update it. Here’s Steve Gibson of Security Now!
So the only real big news is that anyone who is still using or needs to use Java on their system needs to update it. It was just moved by Oracle/Sun, a major update from them, to Java 6 Update 24. It fixed a large collection of vulnerabilities, in total 21, 19 of which can be used to remotely install malicious software. So it’s important. And I did get a kick out of seeing now sort of the wisdom out there, I was reading other people saying, you know, since Java seems to be having so many problems now, and it’s surpassed Adobe in vulnerabilities and exploits, removing it, unless it’s needed, would probably be a good idea. And I’m thinking, hmm, where have we heard that before?
I still need it for some things, so I updated it. And to think I was going to study Java programming…
Things change so quickly in this arena, it’s hard to keep up!
So, let me repeat myself. People tell me everyday about how this kind of advice helps them, so here it is again.
A little Alliteration is good for writing effect every now and then; why not apply this to passwords? I don’t mean to write out an alliterative phrase and turn it into a password or passphrase (though you could, I guess); what I mean is to use a pattern that makes it easy for you to remember the password, but still results in a very strong, un-guessable one. Here’s an example of a very strong password: 19[-[Phrase]-]60.
This one is very weak: %6*Some*Phrase*6%. Can you see why? Too many repetitions of characters. Change it slightly, %6!Some*Phrase!6%, and it becomes very strong.
The trick is to come up with a pattern that means something to you. By no means should you use the patterns I suggest—use something that will be easy for you to remember.
I’ll leave it to you to analyze the two examples and let you come up with your own. Remember, the bad guys read these blogs, too.
I have recently had issues with trying to explain botnets to a client. I was met with blank stares.
Thanks to Sophos for this definition:
A botnet is a collection of infected computers that are remotely controlled by a hacker.
Once a computer is infected with a bot, the hacker can control the computer remotely via the internet. From then on, the computer is a “zombie,” doing the bidding of the hacker, although the user is completely unaware. Collectively, such computers are called a botnet.
The hacker can share or sell access to control the botnet, allowing others to use it for malicious purposes.
For example, a spammer can use a botnet to send out spam email. Up to 99% of all spam is now distributed in this way. This enables the spammers to avoid detection and to get around any blacklisting applied to their own servers. It can also reduce their costsbecause the computer’s owner is paying for the internet access.
Hackers can also use zombies to launch a distributed denial-of-service attack, also known as a DDoS. They arrange for thousands of computers to attempt to access the same website simultaneously, so that the web server is unable to handle all the requests reaching it. The website thus becomes inaccessible.
people who are using Skype are clueless about how to configure it for maximum security, especially if they have set up a public chat. The default security settings for Skype are not adequate by any means.
Let me give you some tips. First off, click here for the list of commands you can issue in a Skype window.
If you have a public chat, you absolutely must issue this command:
/set optins +TOPIC_AND_PIC_LOCKED_FOR_USERS
If you don’t do that, then anyone can change the chat topic and/or title.
Also, change your privacy settings to allow only your contacts to call you and send you private messages.
If you have those things in place, you’re somewhat secure.
A new cyberweapon could take down the entire internet – and there’s not much that current defenses can do to stop it. (Marvin Martian proposed this a long time ago as immediate disintegration) So say Max Schuchard at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis and his colleagues, the masterminds who have created the digital ordnance. But thankfully they have no intention of destroying the net just yet. Instead, they are suggesting improvements to its defenses.
The attack requires a large botnet – a network of computers infected with software that allows them to be externally controlled: Schuchard reckons 250,000 such machines would be enough to take down the internet. Botnets are often used to perform distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, which bring web servers down by overloading them with traffic, but this new line of attack is different.
“Normal DDoS is a hammer; this is more of a scalpel,” says Schuchard. “If you cut in the wrong places then the attack won’t work.”
OK. Forgive me, but while I believe this is possible, only a government could mandate it, and I don’t believe we have anyone is Washington is savvy enough to do it. But, hey, it’s scary enough. Check it out at: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20113-the-cyberweapon-that-could-take-down-the-internet.html
By the way, I am Marvin Martian’s boss, the one he refers to as “Sir Altitude.”