What the heck is a “complex compound passphrase,” you ask? Ah, let me enlighten you, Grasshopper! I am the master of password systems, but this one escaped me. You see, I had fallen into the trap known as complexity and had been busy defining complex algorithms for generating unguessable passwords; in essence, I had been hoist by my own petard.
Yesterday, while solving the latest Cryptoquip puzzle in my local newspaper, I had a revelation. The description of the cryptoquip always says something along the line of “this puzzle is a simple substitution cipher…” The Aha! moment came when I realized that “simple” is the operative word here. People don’t like complexity, so the average person isn’t going to use a complex algorithm.
So, even though I call this “Complex Compound Pass Phrases,” the method of creating them is simple. I call them “complex” because they are extremely strong and nearly unbreakable for all intents and purposes. Here’s how to create them.
- Choose at least two words that are memorable to you. It doesn’t even matter if it’s something someone else would know. Use your pet’s name, your mother’s name, whatever.
- Merge the two (or more) together alternating letters from each word, creating a string.
- To make it all even more secure, capitalize every other letter or change a couple of the letters to their number equivalents.
All that would take a minute, at most and is easily remembered.
Here’s an example using my name and my pet’s name (Kenneth, Missy): KmEiNsNsEyTh. You could change the E’s to 3′s and you would have Km3iNsNs3yTh.
Pretty well unguessable!
Note to hackerz: I have not and never will use that pass phrase, so don’t bother trying to hack me! LOL
Saw this in a security forum today:
Here’s a new one; how about keylogging software pre-installed on brand new laptops, straight from the factory…….BY THE MANUFACTURER!!
The “StarLogger” software was discovered by Mohamed Hassan, founder of NetSec Consulting, after he scanned 2 brand new Samsung laptops [model numbers R525 and 540].
StarLogger auto starts with Windows and records all keystrokes made on the computer. It can be difficult to detect, and can be set to periodically and surreptitiously send e-mails containing information gleaned from the computer to a preset e-mail address, with screen capture images attached.
When Hassan first contacted Samsung to report this intrusion they referred him to Microsoft, saying all they did was manufacture the hardware. However, a senior supervisor at Samsung finally admitted that they had indeed installed the software on the laptops in order to monitor machine performance “and to find out how it is being used.”
In other words, Samsung wanted to gather usage data without obtaining consent from laptop owners.
Sounds as though users should be adding one more essential security step to the conventional strategy…..i.e. thoroughly scan any brand new machine as soon as possible!!
Or do you do that already??
Say it ain’t so, Joe (it’s opening day in Cincinnati).
It ain’t so!
Relax, will ya?
I can’t believe that a somewhat savvy friend of mine asked me about this message. He was actually considering opening it. Some people will fall for anything. The first thing is that this message is very poorly written. Anyway, please inform your family and clients that this is bogus and contains a malware attachment called UPS.zip that will infect their computers with a Trojan horse program. It usually arrives with a subject “United Parcel Service notification <number>”
Dear customer. The parcel was sent your home address. And it will arrive within 3 business day. More information and the tracking number are attached in document below. Thank you. © 1994-2011 United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Just delete it upon receipt.
On March 17th, 2011, Art Coviello, RSA Security‘s Executive Chairman, posted a statement on their website disclosing their discovery of an attack on their network classified as an “Advanced Persistent Threat (APT).” Essentially, this means that the attackers had been rummaging around in their systems for awhile before being discovered; while doing so, they manage to penetrate one of RSA’s most secret databases.
This raises several questions: 1. How did the attackers penetrate RSA’s security perimeter; 2. How did they go unnoticed long enough to become a “persistent” threat; and, 3. What, exactly, did they get?
Coviello doesn’t address either of the first two questions and is quite vague on the third. How do you interpret this?
Our investigation also revealed that the attack resulted in certain information being extracted from RSA’s systems. Some of that information is specifically related to RSA’s SecurID two-factor authentication products [emphasis added]. While at this time we are confident that the information extracted does not enable a successful direct attack on any of our RSA SecurID customers [emphasis added] , this information could potentially be used to reduce the effectiveness of a current two-factor authentication implementation as part of a broader attack [emphasis added]. We are very actively communicating this situation to RSA customers and providing immediate steps for them to take to strengthen their SecurID implementations.
See what I emphasized up there? The attackers got some info related to the SecureID products. RSA isn’t saying exactly what they got, but Steve Gibson makes mention of this in a recent blog post:
…at the time of manufacture individual SecurID devices would be assigned a secret internal random or pseudo-random 64-bit key and a database would be maintained to forever map the device’s externally visible serial number to its internal secret 64-bit key.
This public-serial-number-to-secret-key mapping database then becomes “the keys to the kingdom”. It is RSA’s biggest secret to keep, since a full or partial disclosure of the database would potentially allow attackers to determine a device’s current and future display values and would therefore, of course, break any authentication protection.
More news as it becomes available.
This image needs little explanation, but I want to thank Dave at Davescomputertips.com for posting it in his forum. If you’re not a member of that forum and a subscriber of the newsletter, you need to be. Here’s what he had to say:
I found this over at computerschool.org and it does an excellent job of explaining the “what” and “why” of malware. We at DCT often try to explain it in simple terms, but this picture just lets you follow the flow of money. Now you know why it is important to practice safe computing!
I wrote this article back in 2007. It was relevant then, and it’s relevant now, particularly in the light of the Comodo SSL compromise incident I reported in my last post. While I have gone on to using LastPass to generate and securely store my passwords, I still occasionally use Perfect Paper Passwords to generate secure passwords when I don’t want to clutter up LastPass with things I may never use again. Steve has never mentioned this particular use of PPP, but I think it’s pretty cool.
So, here in all it’s glory is my original article entitled, “Perfect Passwords…On Paper:”
Steve Gibson, creator of Spinrite and winner of the Third Annual People’s Choice Podcast Awards in the Technology/Science category for his Security Now! podcast with Leo Laporte of Twit.tv, has just come up with a super-secure multifactor authentication system. Steve calls it “Perfect Paper Passwords” and you can read all about it on his web site. Be sure to read all of the pages, but beware — it’s pretty geeky stuff. Here’s a simple excerpt:
GRC’s “Perfect Paper Passwords” (PPP) system is a straightforward, simple and secure implementation of a paper-based One Time Password (OTP) system. When used in conjunction with an account name & password, the individual “passcodes” contained on PPP’s “passcards” serve as the second factor (“something you have”) of a secure multi-factor authentication system.
I feel like a kid turned loose in Toys-R-Us with a thousand-dollar budget. This is truly an amazing system and I’m just now starting to figure out how to implement it in my own environment. But using it as Steve designed it isn’t the subject of this post. Most network environments are still based on the username/password model, not a multi-factor authentication model. Until the PPP system becomes a standard (and it should!), why not use the passcards to create super-strong passwords?
I know, I know, he already has the Ultra-high Security Password Generator and I’ve been using that, but the idea of breaking long strings of characters into simple, four-character snippets makes things a bit simpler and it also allows you to take some control over generating your passwords. It adds another random factor into the mix by letting you choose the order of combination, something no computer or person anywhere can possibly know. Putting them into a seven columns by ten rows grid in a format that you can fold and stick in your wallet makes it even easier.
Using the web site, you print out three passcards, each containing 70 four-character passcodes for a total of 210. Now, if you randomly combine three passcodes to make virtually unbreakable 12-character passwords, you’ll have a resource of 70 passwords right at your fingertips. Circle the ones you’re using for your current password and cross them out when you change it. Better yet, write down the columns/rows and keep that separate from your passcards. No one’s going to know that A1F4D10 translates into Cai?DCGX@xBt, but you do.
Tell your clients about it. I do.
SANS NewsBites | March 25, 2011 | Vol. 13, Num. 024: “SSL Security Compromised…Attackers compromised a partner of SSL certificate authority, Comodo and issued themselves fraudulent SSL certificates. The certificates vouch for a site’s authenticity, and would have allowed the thieves to set up sites that fool visitors into believing they have reached major Internet presences, like Google, Microsoft and Skype. Comodo has revoked the stolen certificates.”
Microsoft released an advisory on March 23, 2011 (2524375) noting that the following domains were affected:
- login.yahoo.com (3 certificates)
- addons.mozilla.org (already known from an earlier announcement by Mozilla)
- “Global Trustee”
Now, here’s where it gets interesting. The IP traced to the attacker was that of an Iranian ISP. Think about it. Here’s what Comodo had to say in their blog post:
The IP address of the initial attack was recorded and has been determined to be assigned to an ISP in Iran. A web survey revealed one of the certificates deployed on another IP address assigned to an Iranian ISP.
Of course, this could be just that the attacker was laying a false trail, which would be smart, but how about this?
It does not escape notice that the domains targeted would be of greatest use to a government attempting surveillance of Internet use by dissident groups. The attack comes at a time when many countries in North Africa and the Gulf region are facing popular protests and many commentators have identified the Internet and in particular social networking sites as a major organizing tool for the protests.
It’s a Brave New World.
Here are the first five tips from my new work in progress, “101 Internet Security Tips.” These are unedited and I am posting them here to solicit feedback. The book can become a huge tome, or it can be kept small. I would like you to help guide the direction I take. So, here are the first five entries:
1. Activate protection systems.
If your operating system comes standard with a built-in ﬁrewall, spam
blocker, anti-virus software or other security application, be sure that it’s
activated. Your Internet service provider may provide an e-mail spam
ﬁltering service that should also be turned on.
2. Upgrade your protection.
Using security software won’t help if it’s not up to date. Be sure that
you are using the latest versions of spam, spyware and virus-detection
software. The most current software will be ready to handle the most
current on-line threats. Also remember to renew subscriptions if the
software registration expires at some point.
3. Use anti-virus software.
You should always have anti-virus software on your computer. These
programs scan all ﬁles that are downloaded from e-mail or opened from
the hard drive to ensure that they are safe from malware before use.
When these programs detect a virus, they are able to isolate and
destroy it so it does not infect your computer.
4. Use anti-spyware programs.
Just like anti-virus programs, spyware protection is also necessary.
These programs scan your computer for spyware, browser hijackers
and other malicious programs. Both free and commercial anti-spyware
products are available.
5. Update automatically.
Set both your operating system and security programs to update
automatically. Your virus-detection software needs to adapt as new
threats become known. Allowing the software to do automatic updates
will ensure that you always have the highest level of protection
What do you think?
Surprised? You shouldn’t be. This type of thing seems to happen every time there is a major disaster anywhere in the World. We saw it with Katrina, the Indonesian tsunami, and countless others. The slime-bag criminals have no scruples and will take any opportunity to steal a buck from unsuspecting, good-hearted people.
Best thing to do is set up an email filter and send the emails to the junk bin. If one really wants to help, contact the local Red Cross chapter, or other lawful and recognized charitable groups.
At any rate, direct contact with those organizations is your best bet. Consider any email solicitation a scam.
Kaspersky Lab has detected a malicious spam campaign whereby if someone clicks on the link, the malicious website uses JAVA exploits to install malicious applications on their machine:
My friend and colleague, Jim, over at Dave’s Computer Tips had this to say in our forum:
DO NOT under any circumstances:
*Follow any Web links included in these e-mail messages.
*Open any attachments or click on photos and videos that claim to show dramatic images or footage of disasters.
*Provide any sensitive information, such as bank account information or credit card details.
ALWAYS ascertain the legitimacy of the email before doing anything; Most genuine charities have email addresses which emanate from their own domain and typically direct recipients to their own Web site to make donations….e.g. almost all legitimate charities have a web address that ends with “.org” rather than “.com”. Verify the authenticity of an email by going directly to the charity’s web site or by giving them a call on the telephone.
[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/pgrOKlV9CNI" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]