<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: October 2009 Patch Tuesday Sets New Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/october-2009-patch-tuesday-addresses-34-vulnerabilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/october-2009-patch-tuesday-addresses-34-vulnerabilities/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Morisy</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/october-2009-patch-tuesday-addresses-34-vulnerabilities/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Morisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/?p=386#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Yikes, that's a lot. Based on local security meet ups I've been to, I'd guess it has to do with better response from Microsoft rather than an increase in actual bugs, but either interpretation (or a mix) is certainly possible.

Also, I wiped my screen the first time I saw that bug image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes, that&#8217;s a lot. Based on local security meet ups I&#8217;ve been to, I&#8217;d guess it has to do with better response from Microsoft rather than an increase in actual bugs, but either interpretation (or a mix) is certainly possible.</p>
<p>Also, I wiped my screen the first time I saw that bug image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->