 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel to Acquire McAfee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/ibm-to-acquire-mcafee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/ibm-to-acquire-mcafee/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 20:56:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/ibm-to-acquire-mcafee/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/ibm-to-acquire-mcafee/#comment-89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[I]...this won’t help IBM’s reputation any.[/I]

When I first read the blog post title, I figured it was either a typo or for an early news leak that got it wrong. But when I read the actual post and saw that &quot;IBM&quot; was mentioned [I]a second time[/I], I started getting confused. Double slip? Or is IBM somehow actually involved?

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[I]&#8230;this won’t help IBM’s reputation any.[/I]</p>
<p>When I first read the blog post title, I figured it was either a typo or for an early news leak that got it wrong. But when I read the actual post and saw that &#8220;IBM&#8221; was mentioned [I]a second time[/I], I started getting confused. Double slip? Or is IBM somehow actually involved?</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
