<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Safe Browsing Diagnostic Page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/google-safe-browsing-diagnostic-page/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/google-safe-browsing-diagnostic-page/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MichaelArgast</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/google-safe-browsing-diagnostic-page/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelArgast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/google-safe-browsing-diagnostic-page/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>This is a great tool for finding out the status of sites you aren't sure about, but doesn't necessarily give you the whole picture as to whether it is safe to visit.

A great counter-example to this is the recent attack via the New York Times ad network, detailed here:
[A href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/09/15/hackers-bought-ad-space-york-times/"]http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/09/15/hackers-bought-ad-space-york-times/[/A]

In this case, the site itself wasn't hosting the malicious code, but visiting the site still resulting in a scareware attack against the visitor, through the ad network (which the NYTimes failed to vet). 

Michael Argast, Security Analyst, Sophos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great tool for finding out the status of sites you aren&#8217;t sure about, but doesn&#8217;t necessarily give you the whole picture as to whether it is safe to visit.</p>
<p>A great counter-example to this is the recent attack via the New York Times ad network, detailed here:<br />
<a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/09/15/hackers-bought-ad-space-york-times/"&nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/09/15/hackers-bought-ad-space-york-times/" title="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/09/15/hackers-bought-ad-space-york-times/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/09...&lt;/a&gt;</a></p>
<p>In this case, the site itself wasn&#8217;t hosting the malicious code, but visiting the site still resulting in a scareware attack against the visitor, through the ad network (which the NYTimes failed to vet). </p>
<p>Michael Argast, Security Analyst, Sophos</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->