<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Corner</title>
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>No-Hassle Way to Kill ActiveX Controls</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/no-hassle-way-to-kill-activex-controls/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/no-hassle-way-to-kill-activex-controls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/no-hassle-way-to-kill-activex-controls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ActiveX has always been a weak point in IE. The majority of browser plug-in vulnerabilities are ActiveX based. Microsoft realizes this and has a method to disable certain problematic ActiveX controls. But Microsoft&#8217;s method involves setting the kill bit by editing the registry and in order to discover the CLSID (Class ID) of the control [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ActiveX has always been a weak point in IE. The majority of browser plug-in vulnerabilities are ActiveX based. Microsoft realizes this and has a <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/240797" target="_blank">method to disable</a> certain problematic ActiveX controls. But Microsoft&#8217;s method involves setting the <a href="http://descriptions.securescout.com/glossary/283" target="_blank">kill bit</a> by editing the registry and in order to discover the <a href="http://www.fileresearchcenter.com/showglossaryterm.html?term=CLSID" target="_blank">CLSID</a> (Class ID) of the control you want to disable, you may have to uninstall others. In short, it&#8217;s a messy way to do things.</p>
<p>Errata Security to the rescue. They&#8217;ve created <a href="http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2008/05/activex-is-dangerous.html" target="_blank">AxBan</a>, a free tool to set the kill bit on known bad ActiveX controls. Errata promises that they&#8217;ll &#8220;be updating it as needed with new CLSIDs on an as needed basis.&#8221; AxBan is a single, small (45.5 KB), standalone executable that contains a list of known dangerous ActiveX controls. It highlights in red any you have installed on your system and gives you a button to set the kill bit. Be careful, though&#8211;there isn&#8217;t an &#8220;undo&#8221; button. Once you set the kill bit, if you find you&#8217;ve made a mistake, you&#8217;ll have to edit the registry to unset it.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, it&#8217;s a handy tool to have in your security arsenal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/no-hassle-way-to-kill-activex-controls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows XP SP3 Offers Enhanced Reliability and Security, But Not IE7</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/windows-xp-sp3-offers-enhanced-reliability-and-security/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/windows-xp-sp3-offers-enhanced-reliability-and-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 13:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cryptography]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/windows-xp-sp3-offers-enhanced-reliability-and-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long-awaited Windows XP Service Pack 3 became available as an Express Update May 6, 2008 on Windows Update, and offers enhanced reliability and security through a few new features: Network Access Protection (NAP), designed to work with Windows Server 2008; a product key-less install option; a Kernel Mode cryptographics module, and; a &#8220;black hole&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The long-awaited Windows XP Service Pack 3 became available as an Express Update May 6, 2008 on <a href="http://www.update.microsoft.com/microsoftupdate/v6/default.aspx?ln=en-us" target="_blank">Windows Update</a>, and offers enhanced reliability and security through a few new features: Network Access Protection (<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/nap/napfaq.mspx" target="_blank">NAP</a>), designed to work with Windows Server 2008; a product key-less install option; a Kernel Mode cryptographics module, and; a <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314825" target="_blank">&#8220;black hole&#8221; router</a> detection algorithm.</p>
<p>One puzzling thing, however, is that SP3 doesn&#8217;t include the more secure IE7&#8211;it ships with a fully-patched IE6 instead. As I found out, having applied SP3 to my systems, all of which are running IE7, this isn&#8217;t a problem; systems won&#8217;t be rolled back to IE6. Here&#8217;s an excerpt from the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/" target="_blank">IE Blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>XPSP3 will continue to ship with IE6 and contains a roll-up of the latest security updates for IE6. If you are still running Internet Explorer 6, then XPSP3 will be offered to you via Windows Update as a high priority update. You can safely install XPSP3 and will have an updated version of IE6 with all your personal preferences, such as home pages and favorites, still intact.</p>
<p>If you are currently running IE7 on XPSP2, Windows Update will offer you XPSP3 as a high priority update. If you choose to install XPSP3, Internet Explorer 7 will remain on your system after the install is complete.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you&#8217;re still running IE6, you really should upgrade to IE7. Along with SP3, that will make your XP system as secure as it can be at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/windows-xp-sp3-offers-enhanced-reliability-and-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Encryption Have You Complacent About Physical Security?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/does-encryption-have-you-complacent-about-physical-security/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/does-encryption-have-you-complacent-about-physical-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 01:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/does-encryption-have-you-complacent-about-physical-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no question that data security is senior to physical security. The real value in a stolen laptop or PC isn&#8217;t in the hardware, it&#8217;s in the data. Sure, some druggie might steal your laptop and sell it for a fix, but the real danger lies in the thief who knows the value of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no question that data security is senior to physical security. The real value in a stolen laptop or PC isn&#8217;t in the hardware, it&#8217;s in the data. Sure, some druggie might steal your laptop and sell it for a fix, but the real danger lies in the thief who knows the value of the files that are stored on it.  If it&#8217;s a personal laptop, the passwords to your online banking site, credit card numbers, Social Security number&#8211;probably everything about your identity&#8211;may be stored on it. If it&#8217;s a corporate laptop, depending on who you work for, there could be valuable customer information complete with credit card numbers or other proprietary information that a thief or corporate spy could capitalize on.</p>
<p>But physical security is only slightly less important. Don&#8217;t get complacent thinking that you&#8217;re OK just because your data is secure. It&#8217;s an expensive proposition to replace that data, so you must take steps to prevent theft of your hardware.</p>
<p>Encrypting your data is analogous to hiding it. So hide your laptop. Chain down your PC. Make it as difficult as possible for a thief to steal it. I keep my PC in a locked room when I&#8217;m not nearby and I maintain the attitude that someone’s waiting around the next corner to steal my laptop. So, it’s always either in a secure area or with me–and I mean within a couple of feet of me. I rarely leave it in my car and if for some reason I must, I lock it up in the trunk. I never leave it overnight in the office. Out of sight, out of mind.  There are other physical precautions you can take as <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1186" title="Laptop Security, Part One: Preventing Laptop Theft" target="_blank">this Security Focus article</a> outlines.</p>
<p>And let’s not forget about removable and external storage devices; hide them, too. I&#8217;ll cover that in a future article. For now, I leave you with Maxim #8:</p>
<blockquote><p>Physical security is almost as important as data security. Make it as difficult as possible through any physical means for a thief to steal your hardware. Rules of thumb: Lock it up and lock it down; out of sight, out of mind.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/does-encryption-have-you-complacent-about-physical-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Wallet is the Best Password Manager</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/your-wallet-is-the-best-password-manager/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/your-wallet-is-the-best-password-manager/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Passwords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/your-wallet-is-the-best-password-manager/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I use them for sites that don&#8217;t require much security, password managers are something I generally stay away from. Why? Because they store the information on my hard drive or a website, both of which could be compromised by a determined hacker. Even a relatively unsophisticated hacker could exploit an unpatched vulnerability leaving my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I use them for sites that don&#8217;t require much security, password managers are something I generally stay away from. Why? Because they store the information on my hard drive or a website, both of which could be compromised by a determined hacker. Even a relatively unsophisticated hacker could exploit an unpatched vulnerability leaving my passwords open to inspection. My personal security policy is to make it as hard as possible for someone to get to my passwords.</p>
<p>I write them down and keep them in my wallet.</p>
<p>Yes, that is the most secure &#8220;password manager&#8221; there is. No one can get to your wallet from the Internet or your PC. Passwords written on a piece of paper and stored in your wallet are nearly impossible to compromise&#8211;someone would have to steal your wallet (or you&#8217;d have to lose it) to get at them. How likely is that? I&#8217;m 55 years old and have never lost my wallet or had one stolen. Just be sure not to write down your username with the passwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/your-wallet-is-the-best-password-manager/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Your Laptop is Stolen, Will Your Identity be Stolen?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/if-your-laptop-is-stolen-will-your-identity-be-stolen/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/if-your-laptop-is-stolen-will-your-identity-be-stolen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Portable computing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security maxim]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/if-your-laptop-is-stolen-will-your-identity-be-stolen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We frequently hear news of a laptop holding sensitive information having been stolen. Bad in itself, but the reports often note that the information was unencrypted. Doubly bad. The news rarely focuses on personal laptop thefts, however because there&#8217;s no news value in reporting the loss of Joe Citizen&#8217;s personal files; nothing of value there, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We frequently hear news of a laptop holding sensitive information having been stolen. Bad in itself, but the reports often note that the information was unencrypted. Doubly bad. The news rarely focuses on personal laptop thefts, however because there&#8217;s no news value in reporting the loss of Joe Citizen&#8217;s personal files; nothing of value there, they think. But Joe&#8217;s entire life savings may soon be wiped out if he has ever used that laptop for online banking or other financial transactions.</p>
<p>Recently, a friend of mine (who shall remain nameless for security reasons) had his <span class="highlighted_search_term">lapto</span>p stolen out of his car. Fortunately, he had just purchased it and there was nothing of value on it, but there could have been&#8211;he&#8217;s an oil company executive. Modern thieves know that if they can get their hands on a computer holding sensitive information — particularly bank or credit card information — they can sell that computer for tens or hundreds of times the value of the hardware. The hardware is virtually worthless to them. From the thief’s point of view, any laptop sitting on the seat or floor of a decent car or a desktop PC in a middle class home office <em>could</em> belong to someone who has access to valuable information.</p>
<p>But, if the data is encrypted, the thief is out of luck.</p>
<p>I’ll cover physical security later. For now, I present Maxim #7:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you store sensitive information on a PC or laptop, even if it’s only personal information, encrypt the folders or drives where the information is stored and use an <a href="http://www.lockergnome.com/nexus/gnomewriter/2007/05/01/how-to-create-great-passwords-and-remember-them-easily" title="How to create great passwords" target="_blank">unguessable passphrase</a> as the encryption key.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/if-your-laptop-is-stolen-will-your-identity-be-stolen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Five Personal Firewalls</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/top-five-personal-firewalls/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/top-five-personal-firewalls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Instrusion prevention]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HIPS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intrusion detection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/top-five-personal-firewalls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How well does your personal firewall protect you? GRC&#8217;s Leak Test, PCFlank, and Bob Sundling&#8217;s TooLeaky all provide a quick way to check your personal firewall to see if it effectively blocks outbound connections.  But if you really want to know how well your firewall protects you against a whole host of known attacks, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How well does your personal firewall protect you? <a href="http://www.grc.com/lt/leaktest.htm" title="Gibson Research Corporation Leak Test" target="_blank">GRC&#8217;s Leak Test</a>, <a href="http://www.pcflank.com/pcflankleaktest.htm" target="_blank">PCFlank</a>, and Bob Sundling&#8217;s <a href="http://tooleaky.zensoft.com/">TooLeaky</a> all provide a quick way to check your personal firewall to see if it effectively blocks outbound connections.  But if you really want to know how well your firewall protects you against a whole host of known attacks, check out <a href="http://www.matousec.com/projects/firewall-challenge/results.php" target="_blank">Matousec&#8217;s Firewall Challenge</a> website. Here are the top five based on Matousec&#8217;s extensive testing:</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.personalfirewall.comodo.com/download_firewall.html" title="Comodo Firewall Pro" target="_blank">Comodo Firewall Pro</a> 3.0.21.329 (Free)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.tallemu.com/" title="Online Armor" target="_blank">Online Armor Personal Firewall</a> 2.1.0.119 ($40, Free version available)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.proactive-hips.com/" title="ProSecurity" target="_blank">ProSecurity</a> 1.43 ($30 single PC home user, $40 household)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.agnitum.com/purchase/outpost/index.php" title="Outpost Firewall Pro" target="_blank">Outpost Firewall Pro</a> 2008 6.0.2302.264.0490 ($40/year for 3 home PCs)</li>
<li><a href="http://usa.kaspersky.com/products_services/internet-security.php" title="Kaspersky Internet Security" target="_blank">Kaspersky Internet Security</a> 7.0.1.325 ($80/year for 3 PCs)</li>
</ol>
<p>The top two, Comodo and Online Armor, scored 100% on the tests. I&#8217;m using Comodo from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/top-five-personal-firewalls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tighten Security With Your Hosts File</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/tighten-security-with-your-hosts-file/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/tighten-security-with-your-hosts-file/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/tighten-security-with-your-hosts-file/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using a HOSTS file to block access to malicious or unwanted web sites is an old trick and it&#8217;s excellent protection against malware. I&#8217;ve been using the mvps.org hosts file for about five years, and I have never been infected with any malware, despite, for testing purposes, intentionally visiting sites known to host it. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a HOSTS file to block access to malicious or unwanted web sites is an old trick and it&#8217;s excellent protection against malware. I&#8217;ve been using the <a href="http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm" title="MVPS.org" target="_blank">mvps.org hosts file</a> for about five years, and I have never been infected with any malware, despite, for testing purposes, <em>intentionally</em> visiting sites known to host it. The thing just works. It&#8217;s a great way to add an additional layer of security to your machine. You&#8217;ll also notice that many of those annoying ads no longer display in your browser.</p>
<p>Today, I found a cool utility that will let you download, install, and update your HOSTS file directly from the mvps.org site: <a href="http://faltronsoft.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=12&amp;Itemid=14" title="Hosts File Updater" target="_blank">Hosts File Updater</a>, a freeware program by <a href="http://faltronsoft.org/index.php?option=com_frontpage&amp;Itemid=1" title="FaltronSoft" target="_blank">FaltronSoft.</a> This single 16K executable checks the mvps.org site for a new version of the HOSTS file. If it finds one, it asks you if you want to update. Give your permission and the program backs up your existing HOSTS file and downloads and installs the new one. It also automatically sets the file to read-only, a nice feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/tighten-security-with-your-hosts-file/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Prevent DNS Rebinding Attacks</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/how-to-prevent-dns-rebinding-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/how-to-prevent-dns-rebinding-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Passwords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Routers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/how-to-prevent-dns-rebinding-attacks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s nothing new about the DNS rebinding attack, but it&#8217;s in the news again. Dan Kaminsky, Director of Penetration Testing for IOActive has shown a video of the attack in action at the RSA 2008 Conference. I first addressed this problem more than a year ago in a Lockergnome posting, and just recently in this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing new about the <a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=128963" title="DNS rebinding attack" target="_blank">DNS rebinding attack</a>, but it&#8217;s in the news again. Dan Kaminsky, Director of Penetration Testing for <a href="http://www.ioactive.com/index.html">IOActive</a> has shown a video of the attack in action at the <a href="http://www.rsaconference.com/2008/US/home.aspx">RSA 2008 Conference</a>. I first addressed this problem more than a year ago in a <a href="http://www.lockergnome.com/gnomewriter/2007/03/03/how-to-secure-your-computer-maxim-3/" title="Lockergnome posting" target="_blank">Lockergnome posting</a>, and just recently in <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/omit-this/" target="_blank">this Security Corner article</a>.  Both of those articles say the same thing: Change the default password on routers, switches, and any other configurable device on your network.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s another thing you can do: Use <a href="http://www.opendns.com/" target="_blank">OpenDNS</a>; they block known phishing and malware-infested sites, thereby making your web surfing more secure. They also just released a nifty tool called <a href="http://www.fixmylinksys.com/" target="_blank">FixMyLinksys</a> that makes it easy for anyone to change the default password and enable OpenDNS. An <a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=150567&amp;f_src=darkreading_sitedefault" target="_blank">article</a> at <a href="http://darkreading.com" target="_blank">DarkReading.com</a> had this to say about OpenDNS:</p>
<blockquote><p><font>&#8230;“This will stop all the automated attacks that Dan is showing at the RSA conference today. It&#8217;s easy and is done over the Web,” says David Ulevitch, CEO of OpenDNS. </font></p>
<p><font>OpenDNS also launched a new type of DNS filter today that protects users from a DNS response from a malicious server. &#8220;In short, a DNS response from a malicious server that resolves to a host inside your network would get blocked,” Ulevitch says. </font></p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using OpenDNS for some time; I&#8217;m glad to see they&#8217;ve addressed this issue directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/how-to-prevent-dns-rebinding-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Make Your Own Paper Enigma Machine</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/make-your-own-paper-enigma-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/make-your-own-paper-enigma-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptography]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/make-your-own-paper-enigma-machine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Enigma cipher machine was a very cool electromechanical device for producing polyalphabetic ciphers that reached it&#8217;s heyday during World War II. The original surviving devices are all in museums or private collections, but you can make a paper version. This site: http://mckoss.com/Crypto/Enigma.htm  will let you print one out and play with it.
Using the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enigma_machine" title="Enigma" target="_blank">Enigma cipher machine</a> was a very cool electromechanical device for producing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyalphabetic_cipher" title="Polyalphabetic cipher" target="_blank">polyalphabetic ciphers</a> that reached it&#8217;s heyday during World War II. The original surviving devices are all in museums or private collections, but you can make a paper version. This site: <a href="http://mckoss.com/Crypto/Enigma.htm" target="_blank">http://mckoss.com/Crypto/Enigma.htm </a> will let you print one out and play with it.</p>
<p>Using the paper version is tedious, though, so you might want to check out this cool <a href="http://users.telenet.be/d.rijmenants/en/enigmasim.htm" target="_blank">simulation</a> that you can install on your PC. There&#8217;s also an online <a href="http://enigmaco.de/enigma/enigma.swf" target="_blank">Flash-based simulation</a>.</p>
<p>Have fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/make-your-own-paper-enigma-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You a Security &#8220;No&#8221; Man or a Security &#8220;Yes&#8221; Man?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/are-you-a-security-no-man-or-a-security-yes-man/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/are-you-a-security-no-man-or-a-security-yes-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Harthun</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/are-you-a-security-no-man-or-a-security-yes-man/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We security wonks always seem to be put into a position of having to say &#8220;no.&#8221; That makes us unpopular with the I&#8217;m-not-hurting-anything crowd who insist on checking their webmail, IMing their friends, and running assorted and sundry downloaded and web-based applications (but only on their time, of course). Maybe they&#8217;re right on some level; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We security wonks always seem to be put into a position of having to say &#8220;no.&#8221; That makes us unpopular with the I&#8217;m-not-hurting-anything crowd who insist on checking their webmail, IMing their friends, and running assorted and sundry downloaded and web-based applications (but only on their time, of course). Maybe they&#8217;re right on some level; many of those things are benign and don&#8217;t represent security threats. But there are also potentially dangerous applications such as peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing that can expose your network to hackers via an open P2P connection (See <a href="http://http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=134544" target="_blank">P2P Leads to Major Leak at Citigroup Unit</a> and <a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=126297" target="_blank">Pfizer Falls Victim to P2P Hack</a>).  What&#8217;s one to do?</p>
<p>Start saying &#8220;Yes.&#8221; You read that right. Look at it from the user&#8217;s standpoint: A blanket prohibition against anything and everything usually foments rebellion on the part of some and they&#8217;ll do whatever they want to do with wild abandon. Your network is less secure as a result. But, if you develop policies that allow webmail, online shopping, and IM instead of blocking them at the gateway, while prohibiting the potentially dangerous stuff, you just might find the users starting to ask you if it&#8217;s OK to do certain things.</p>
<p>And they just might listen to you if you say &#8220;No.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-corner/are-you-a-security-no-man-or-a-security-yes-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
