<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TJX court documents confirm earlier suspicions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-bytes/tjx-court-documents-confirm-earlier-suspicions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-bytes/tjx-court-documents-confirm-earlier-suspicions/</link>
	<description>A SearchSecurity.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Another sign Visa was on to TJX&#8217;s security troubles &#8212; Security Bytes</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-bytes/tjx-court-documents-confirm-earlier-suspicions/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Another sign Visa was on to TJX&#8217;s security troubles &#8212; Security Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://security.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/10/29/tjx-court-documents-confirm-earlier-suspicions/#comment-424</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, we now know that Visa less than satisfied with TJX&#8217;s dilligance in pursuing those remediation efforts, since Visa hit Fifth Third bank with $880,000 in fines over the TJX security breach this past summer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, we now know that Visa less than satisfied with TJX&#8217;s dilligance in pursuing those remediation efforts, since Visa hit Fifth Third bank with $880,000 in fines over the TJX security breach this past summer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->