 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I.T. Security and Linux Administration &#187; network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/tag/network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin</link>
	<description>When the penguins and windows can live together, there shall be one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 03:23:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Passive vs. Restrictive Firewalls</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/passive-vs-restrictive-firewalls/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/passive-vs-restrictive-firewalls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restrictive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started writing this article late last week or earlier this week, but some unknown issue happened (gotta love driver issues).  The point of this article is to cover the benefits and costs of both passive and restrictive firewalls.  When I first got into I.T. security I always thought restrictive firewalls were the most secure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/passive-vs-restrictive-firewalls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improved Network Security</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/improved-network-security/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/improved-network-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improvements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iptables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tcp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/improved-network-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Linux 3.0 coming up around the corner, I thought it would be good to discuss some (possible) future improvements and additions to the kernel.  While this is already in the 2.8 branch (which was created before the official 3.0 was announced), it&#8217;ll be interesting to see what is carried over.  One of the first [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/improved-network-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
