 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I.T. Security and Linux Administration &#187; firewall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/tag/firewall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin</link>
	<description>When the penguins and windows can live together, there shall be one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 03:23:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>The removal of tcp_wrappers</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/the-removal-of-tcp_wrappers/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/the-removal-of-tcp_wrappers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iptables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tcp_wrappers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/the-removal-of-tcp_wrappers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not too long ago, Arch Linux released an update on their distribution, stating that they are removing support for tcp_wrappers. For the most part, this doesn&#8217;t seem to be a big deal. They aren&#8217;t a world-renown distribution like Ubuntu or Red Hat, so its unlikely that unless its a kernel-based decision, the world is going [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/the-removal-of-tcp_wrappers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Improved Network Security</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/improved-network-security/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/improved-network-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Hansen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improvements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iptables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tcp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/improved-network-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Linux 3.0 coming up around the corner, I thought it would be good to discuss some (possible) future improvements and additions to the kernel.  While this is already in the 2.8 branch (which was created before the official 3.0 was announced), it&#8217;ll be interesting to see what is carried over.  One of the first [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-admin/improved-network-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
