Will more companies halt SAP projects? - SAP Watch
» VIEW ALL POSTS Dec 19 2008   10:09AM GMT

Will more companies halt SAP projects?



Posted by: Courtney Bjorlin
SAP

Most companies that have already started IT projects will finish them even in this economy, analysts and customers have told me in the last month. It seemed like, for the most part, that was holding true.

But the paradigm seems to lose a little luster with Select Comfort’s announcement this week that it’s halting its SAP implementation as part of cost-cutting measures. It appears from SEC filings that the implementation was costing millions of dollars. The bed retailer is also laying off around 120 people — about 22% of its workforce.

No doubt there’s more than one reason why this implementation was halted. But there’s one clue that’s far more interesting than it perhaps being over-budget or behind schedule.

It seems like it was a huge project, and one which the company expected would be completed in early 2008. The company was implementing SAP ERP, CRM, SCM, PLM, SRM, HCM, SEM, BI and enterprise portal to replace its current disparate software systems and facilitate a growth strategy, according to an earlier SEC filing.

“Our current management information systems may not be adequate to support our growth strategy,” one SEC filing said. “We believe this SAP-based IT architecture, along with best-practices-based processes and greater utilization of off-the-shelf, packaged solutions, will provide greater flexibility and functionality for our growing and evolving business model and be less expensive to maintain over the long-term.”

The recession, however, changed everything. Select Comfort now plans to close dozens of stores, according to a press release from the company. Therefore, the software implementation it wanted to help pursue those business plans may need to change as well.

“There are several alternate SAP implementation approaches and given the smaller than anticipated current size of the Company, the approach to SAP software originally adopted may be outsized for the Company’s needs,” a letter from an investment adviser to the company’s board of directors filed with the SEC and quoted in this ComputerWorld story said.

It seems likely that other companies, which started implementations a year or more ago but haven’t yet finished them, may too be facing similar challenges.

Comment on this Post


You must be logged-in to post a comment. Log-in/Register

John Sicard  |   Dec 22 2008   1:59PM GMT

I might add that this phenomenon may extend to all other “large” ERP providers with “large” budget projects spanning “long” periods of time. As you stated in your post, “The recession, however, changed everything”. Under such uncertain times, Enterprises will be more inclined to invest in strategic solutions to better weather the storm. In such a case, rapid time to value will be key. We may very well see a shift in focus from tactical execution improvements (usually translates to large ERP projects/upgrades spanning months/years) to dramatically improving the their competency in “sense and respond”, where best-of-bread vendors have long had the upper hand on ERP providers.


 

Peter K  |   Dec 23 2008   5:38AM GMT

It is not only that SAP projects are stopped or delayed. If you look at the example at hand, you see that basically the complete company would run under SAP: SAP ERP, CRM, SCM, PLM, SRM, HCM, SEM, BI and enterprise portal: sales, production, purchase, human capital, enterprise management, reporting. However, as customers in Germany recently found out, this can be an expensive undertaking or at least it is difficult to calculate.

The main reason of complains in the last weeks was, that these companies, with a turnover between 1 and 10 billion Euro, had done exactly the same: build the IT completely on SAP. As most IT related people know, such an architecture can not be changed over night. A replacement would take years and cost millions. So what do you do ? -> You sign the new maintenance contract if you can not afford a frozen system !

That was what the trouble in Germany was about, as reported by these customers in Düsseldorf on December 10th, 2008.


 

Peter K  |   Dec 23 2008   5:45AM GMT

It is not only that SAP projects are stopped or delayed. If you look at the example at hand, you see that basically the complete company would run under SAP: SAP ERP, CRM, SCM, PLM, SRM, HCM, SEM, BI and enterprise portal: sales, production, purchase, human capital, enterprise management, reporting. However, as customers in Germany recently found out, this can be an expensive undertaking or at least it is difficult to calculate.

The main reason of complains in the last weeks was, that these companies, with a turnover between 1 and 10 billion Euro, had done exactly the same: build the IT completely on SAP. As most IT related people know, such an architecture can not be changed over night. A replacement would take years and cost millions. So what do you do ? -> You sign the new maintenance contract if you can not afford a frozen system !

That was what the trouble in Germany was about, as reported by these customers in Düsseldor


 

business implementation strategy  |   Dec 28 2008   1:33AM GMT

<strong>business implementation strategy</strong>

Your topic The Quality Stocks Stock Newsletter For Smallcap Companies Blog ” Blog … was interesting when I found it on Sunday searching for business implementation strategy”


 

Me, Enterprise Consulting » Select Comfort’s stalled SAP install grabs an awful lot of attention  |   Dec 28 2008   3:30AM GMT

[...] So, it probably isn’t fair to say query “[w]ill more companies halt SAP projects?” While I’m keenly aware that you shouldn’t rely fully on a company spokesperson, her words quoted in Computerworld are relevant here: ”We fully recognize these are truly critical times for our customers … [but] what we’re seeing is this is not a trend. SAP projects are continuing to go forward,” she said. “Our experience is that even in this macro environment, companies are standing firm.” [...]


 

Eric Kimberling  |   Dec 30 2008   9:19PM GMT

Good post. It’s unfortunate, but sometimes it takes a bad economy in order for companies to rationalize their investments in ERP and other technologies. Even in good times, companies like Select Comfort, Hershey, etc. shouldn’t be implementing SAP if they can’t stay on time, on budget, and deliver measurable business benefits to the organization. Hopefully the trend toward demanding a rational return on investment in ERP technology will last long after the recession ends.

Eric Kimberling
Panorama Consulting Group <a href="http://www.panorama-consulting.com" title="http://www.panorama-consulting.
" target="_blank">www.panorama-consulting.com</a>


 

Jack  |   Dec 31 2008   1:36AM GMT

<strong>career harmony</strong>

Although I understand the gist of what you are trying to say, there are still a few points that I need further clarification on.


 

AlexanderGreat  |   Dec 31 2008   6:28AM GMT

<strong>yo</strong>

wonderful


 

chineseman  |   Jan 1 2009   7:09PM GMT

<strong>hey</strong>

disagree


 

liger  |   Jan 2 2009   1:07PM GMT

<strong>hey</strong>

everything dynamic and very positively


 

crm companies  |   Jan 3 2009   12:07AM GMT

<strong>crm companies</strong>

Good post. I am looking into these issues on my blog.


 

What’s the real trend in failed SAP projects? - SAP Watch  |   Jan 22 2009   6:29PM GMT

[...] often joke that anything that happens three times signals a trend. So when you consider Select Comfort’s announcement last month that it was halting its SAP ERP implementation as part of a cost cutting measure, it would seem SAP is one step away from being blamed for [...]