<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SAP: What went wrong? Blame marketing, NetWeaver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sap-watch/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sap-watch/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/</link>
	<description>A SearchSAP.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: domainmaster</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sap-watch/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>domainmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sap.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/10/29/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/#comment-840</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;hi&lt;/strong&gt;

exellent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;strong&gt;hi&lt;/strong&gt;</p>
<p>exellent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chandra shekar dasari</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sap-watch/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>chandra shekar dasari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sap.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/10/29/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/#comment-838</guid>
		<description>Though we agree, using the Netweaver stack is bit complex with the mix &#38; match of abap &#38; java stack.Even its widely known that Pi dont support all the features seamlessly, followed by licenced cost of volume based messages makes the large scale customers think twice before evaluating the productsecially going for industry specigfic standards.
Still if SAp needs to fulfill this gap, it needs to come up with an seamless integration components, low cost based for wider usage.

Regards
chandra dasari
Project manager-Process integration
Yash technologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though we agree, using the Netweaver stack is bit complex with the mix &amp; match of abap &amp; java stack.Even its widely known that Pi dont support all the features seamlessly, followed by licenced cost of volume based messages makes the large scale customers think twice before evaluating the productsecially going for industry specigfic standards.<br />
Still if SAp needs to fulfill this gap, it needs to come up with an seamless integration components, low cost based for wider usage.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
chandra dasari<br />
Project manager-Process integration<br />
Yash technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deasún</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sap-watch/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Deasún</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sap.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/10/29/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/#comment-837</guid>
		<description>Axel's comment on the reason for increased support costs is absolutely correct - SAP designed a complex set-up which is difficult and costly to support but, of course, this is a problem of their own making.  To ask customers absorb increased costs because of SAP's design decisions borders on the suicidal in a competitive market.  Further, he is also correct that the products which use the Java stack are the main culprits; even relatively simply tasks such as patching BI is now a complex and wearisome chore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Axel&#8217;s comment on the reason for increased support costs is absolutely correct - SAP designed a complex set-up which is difficult and costly to support but, of course, this is a problem of their own making.  To ask customers absorb increased costs because of SAP&#8217;s design decisions borders on the suicidal in a competitive market.  Further, he is also correct that the products which use the Java stack are the main culprits; even relatively simply tasks such as patching BI is now a complex and wearisome chore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chikram Naramurthmerganahtan</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sap-watch/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Chikram Naramurthmerganahtan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sap.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/10/29/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/#comment-836</guid>
		<description>You should check out Ray Wang's blog that talks about how to rebuild the vendor-client trust factor. This is good for all vendors not just SAP. http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2008/10/12/mondays-musings-5-steps-to-restoring-trust-in-the-vendor-customer-relationship/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should check out Ray Wang&#8217;s blog that talks about how to rebuild the vendor-client trust factor. This is good for all vendors not just SAP.&nbsp;&lt;a href="http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2008/10/12/mondays-musings-5-steps-to-restoring-trust-in-the-vendor-customer-relationship/" title="http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2008/10/12/mondays-musings-5-steps-to-restoring-trust-in-the-vendor-customer-relationship/" target="_blank"&gt;http://blog.softwareinsider.org/2008/10/&#8230;&lt;/a&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sap-watch/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sap.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/10/29/sap-what-went-wrong-blame-marketing-netweaver/#comment-835</guid>
		<description>So, why did they refuse to give an outlook on Q4/2008 ? On September 24th Henning Kagermann, Co-CEO, saw SAP untouched by the financial crisis. This is an invitation to investors ! 10 days later the party was over and an unexpected steep down turn had occurred in the last 2 weeks of September ? Is this the whole story ? If you calculate this down turn from the prognosis and the figures presented, you end up with a decline of about 60%. By October 28th it should have been possible to judge the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, why did they refuse to give an outlook on Q4/2008 ? On September 24th Henning Kagermann, Co-CEO, saw SAP untouched by the financial crisis. This is an invitation to investors ! 10 days later the party was over and an unexpected steep down turn had occurred in the last 2 weeks of September ? Is this the whole story ? If you calculate this down turn from the prognosis and the figures presented, you end up with a decline of about 60%. By October 28th it should have been possible to judge the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->